scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Jin Mo Goo

Bio: Jin Mo Goo is an academic researcher from Seoul National University Hospital. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Lung cancer. The author has an hindex of 58, co-authored 317 publications receiving 13445 citations. Previous affiliations of Jin Mo Goo include Washington University in St. Louis & New Generation University College.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: These guidelines represent the consensus of the Fleischner Society, and as such, they incorporate the opinions of a multidisciplinary international group of thoracic radiologists, pulmonologists, surgeons, pathologists, and other specialists.
Abstract: The Fleischner Society Guidelines for management of solid nodules were published in 2005, and separate guidelines for subsolid nodules were issued in 2013. Since then, new information has become available; therefore, the guidelines have been revised to reflect current thinking on nodule management. The revised guidelines incorporate several substantive changes that reflect current thinking on the management of small nodules. The minimum threshold size for routine follow-up has been increased, and recommended follow-up intervals are now given as a range rather than as a precise time period to give radiologists, clinicians, and patients greater discretion to accommodate individual risk factors and preferences. The guidelines for solid and subsolid nodules have been combined in one simplified table, and specific recommendations have been included for multiple nodules. These guidelines represent the consensus of the Fleischner Society, and as such, they incorporate the opinions of a multidisciplinary international group of thoracic radiologists, pulmonologists, surgeons, pathologists, and other specialists. Changes from the previous guidelines issued by the Fleischner Society are based on new data and accumulated experience. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article. An earlier incorrect version of this article appeared online. This article was corrected on March 13, 2017.

1,412 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
07 Apr 2020-Chest
TL;DR: A multidisciplinary panel comprised principally of radiologists and pulmonologists from 10 countries with experience managing COVID-19 patients across a spectrum of healthcare environments evaluated the utility of imaging within three scenarios representing varying risk factors, community conditions, and resource constraints, resulting in five main and three additional recommendations intended to guide medical practitioners in the use of CXR and CT in the management of COIDs.

1,232 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed a set of recommendations specifically aimed at subsolid nodules, which are based on the original Fleischner Society guidelines for incidentally detected solid nodules.
Abstract: This report is to complement the original Fleischner Society recommendations for incidentally detected solid nodules by proposing a set of recommendations specifically aimed at subsolid nodules. The development of a standardized approach to the interpretation and management of subsolid nodules remains critically important given that peripheral adenocarcinomas represent the most common type of lung cancer, with evidence of increasing frequency. Following an initial consideration of appropriate terminology to describe subsolid nodules and a brief review of the new classification system for peripheral lung adenocarcinomas sponsored by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC), American Thoracic Society (ATS), and European Respiratory Society (ERS), six specific recommendations were made, three with regard to solitary subsolid nodules and three with regard to multiple subsolid nodules. Each recommendation is followed first by the rationales underlying the recommendation and then by specific pertinent remarks. Finally, issues for which future research is needed are discussed. The recommendations are the result of careful review of the literature now available regarding subsolid nodules. Given the complexity of these lesions, the current recommendations are more varied than the original Fleischner Society guidelines for solid nodules. It cannot be overemphasized that these guidelines must be interpreted in light of an individual's clinical history. Given the frequency with which subsolid nodules are encountered in daily clinical practice, and notwithstanding continuing controversy on many of these issues, it is anticipated that further refinements and modifications to these recommendations will be forthcoming as information continues to emerge from ongoing research.

788 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An introduction to the software frequently used for performing ROC analyses is presented and important concepts involved in the correct use and interpretation of this analysis, such as smooth and empirical ROC curves, parametric and nonparametric methods, and the area under the ROC curve and its 95% confidence interval are discussed.
Abstract: The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, which is defined as a plot of test sensitivity as they coordinate versus its 1-specificity or false positive rate (FPR) as the x coordinate, is an effective method of evaluating the performance of diagnostic tests. The purpose of this article is to provide a nonmathematical introduction to ROC analysis. Important concepts involved in the correct use and interpretation of this analysis, such as smooth and empirical ROC curves, parametric and nonparametric methods, the area under the ROC curve and its 95% confidence interval, the sensitivity at a particular FPR, and the use of a partial area under the ROC curve are discussed. Various considerations concerning the collection of data in radiological ROC studies are briefly discussed. An introduction to the software frequently used for performing ROC analyses is also presented.

690 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
William D. Travis1, Hisao Asamura2, Alexander A. Bankier3, Mary Beth Beasley4, Frank C. Detterbeck5, Douglas B. Flieder6, Jin Mo Goo7, Heber MacMahon8, David P. Naidich9, Andrew G. Nicholson10, Charles A. Powell, Mathias Prokop11, Ramón Rami-Porta12, Valerie W. Rusch1, Paul Van Schil, Yasushi Yatabe, Peter Goldstraw10, David Ball13, David G. Beer14, Ricardo Beyruti15, Vanessa Bolejack16, Kari Chansky16, John Crowley16, Wilfried Eberhardt17, John G. Edwards18, Françoise Galateau-Salle19, Dorothy Giroux16, Fergus V. Gleeson20, Patti A. Groome21, James Huang1, Catherine Kennedy22, Jhingook Kim23, Young Tae Kim24, Laura Kingsbury16, Haruhiko Kondo25, Mark Krasnik26, Kaoru Kubota27, Antoon Lerut28, Gustavo Lyons29, Mirella Marino, Edith M. Marom30, Jan P. van Meerbeeck31, Alan Mitchell16, Takashi Nakano32, Anna K. Nowak33, Michael D Peake34, Thomas W. Rice35, Kenneth E. Rosenzweig36, Enrico Ruffini37, Nagahiro Saijo, Jean-Paul Sculier38, Lynn Shemanski16, Kelly G. Stratton16, Kenji Suzuki39, Yuji Tachimori40, Charles F. Thomas41, William D. Travis1, Ming-Sound Tsao42, Andrew T. Turrisi43, Johan Vansteenkiste28, Hirokazu Watanabe, Yi-Long Wu, Paul Baas44, Jeremy J. Erasmus30, Seiki Hasegawa32, Kouki Inai45, Kemp H. Kernstine46, Hedy L. Kindler8, Lee M. Krug1, Kristiaan Nackaerts28, Harvey I. Pass9, David C. Rice30, Conrad Falkson21, Pier Luigi Filosso37, Giuseppe Giaccone47, Kazuya Kondo48, Marco Lucchi49, Meinoshin Okumura50, Eugene H. Blackstone35 
TL;DR: Codes for the primary tumor categories of AIS and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) and a uniform way to measure tumor size in part‐solid tumors for the eighth edition of the tumor, node, and metastasis classification of lung cancer are proposed.

431 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This new adenocarcinoma classification is needed to provide uniform terminology and diagnostic criteria, especially for bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC), the overall approach to small nonresection cancer specimens, and for multidisciplinary strategic management of tissue for molecular and immunohistochemical studies.

3,850 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Members of the Fleischner Society compiled a glossary of terms for thoracic imaging that replaces previous glossaries published in 1984 and 1996 for Thoracic radiography and computed tomography, respectively.
Abstract: Members of the Fleischner Society compiled a glossary of terms for thoracic imaging that replaces previous glossaries published in 1984 and 1996 for thoracic radiography and computed tomography (CT), respectively. The need to update the previous versions came from the recognition that new words have emerged, others have become obsolete, and the meaning of some terms has changed. Brief descriptions of some diseases are included, and pictorial examples (chest radiographs and CT scans) are provided for the majority of terms.

3,299 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Peter Goldstraw1, Kari Chansky, John Crowley, Ramón Rami-Porta2, Hisao Asamura3, Wilfried Ernst Erich Eberhardt4, Andrew G. Nicholson1, Patti A. Groome5, Alan Mitchell, Vanessa Bolejack, David Ball6, David G. Beer7, Ricardo Beyruti8, Frank C. Detterbeck9, Wilfried Eberhardt4, John G. Edwards10, Françoise Galateau-Salle11, Dorothy Giroux12, Fergus V. Gleeson13, James Huang14, Catherine Kennedy15, Jhingook Kim16, Young Tae Kim17, Laura Kingsbury12, Haruhiko Kondo18, Mark Krasnik19, Kaoru Kubota20, Antoon Lerut21, Gustavo Lyons, Mirella Marino, Edith M. Marom22, Jan P. van Meerbeeck23, Takashi Nakano24, Anna K. Nowak25, Michael D Peake26, Thomas W. Rice27, Kenneth E. Rosenzweig28, Enrico Ruffini29, Valerie W. Rusch14, Nagahiro Saijo, Paul Van Schil23, Jean-Paul Sculier30, Lynn Shemanski12, Kelly G. Stratton12, Kenji Suzuki31, Yuji Tachimori32, Charles F. Thomas33, William D. Travis14, Ming-Sound Tsao34, Andrew T. Turrisi35, Johan Vansteenkiste21, Hirokazu Watanabe, Yi-Long Wu, Paul Baas36, Jeremy J. Erasmus22, Seiki Hasegawa24, Kouki Inai37, Kemp H. Kernstine38, Hedy L. Kindler39, Lee M. Krug14, Kristiaan Nackaerts21, Harvey I. Pass40, David C. Rice22, Conrad Falkson5, Pier Luigi Filosso29, Giuseppe Giaccone41, Kazuya Kondo42, Marco Lucchi43, Meinoshin Okumura44, Eugene H. Blackstone27, F. Abad Cavaco, E. Ansótegui Barrera, J. Abal Arca, I. Parente Lamelas, A. Arnau Obrer45, R. Guijarro Jorge45, D. Ball6, G.K. Bascom46, A. I. Blanco Orozco, M. A. González Castro, M.G. Blum, D. Chimondeguy, V. Cvijanovic47, S. Defranchi48, B. de Olaiz Navarro, I. Escobar Campuzano2, I. Macía Vidueira2, E. Fernández Araujo49, F. Andreo García49, Kwun M. Fong, G. Francisco Corral, S. Cerezo González, J. Freixinet Gilart, L. García Arangüena, S. García Barajas50, P. Girard, Tuncay Göksel, M. T. González Budiño51, G. González Casaurrán50, J. A. Gullón Blanco, J. Hernández Hernández, H. Hernández Rodríguez, J. Herrero Collantes, M. Iglesias Heras, J. M. Izquierdo Elena, Erik Jakobsen, S. Kostas52, P. León Atance, A. Núñez Ares, M. Liao, M. Losanovscky, G. Lyons, R. Magaroles53, L. De Esteban Júlvez53, M. Mariñán Gorospe, Brian C. McCaughan15, Catherine J. Kennedy15, R. Melchor Íñiguez54, L. Miravet Sorribes, S. Naranjo Gozalo, C. Álvarez de Arriba, M. Núñez Delgado, J. Padilla Alarcón, J. C. Peñalver Cuesta, Jongsun Park16, H. Pass40, M. J. Pavón Fernández, Mara Rosenberg, Enrico Ruffini29, V. Rusch14, J. Sánchez de Cos Escuín, A. Saura Vinuesa, M. Serra Mitjans, Trond Eirik Strand, Dragan Subotic, S.G. Swisher22, Ricardo Mingarini Terra8, Charles R. Thomas33, Kurt G. Tournoy55, P. Van Schil23, M. Velasquez, Y.L. Wu, K. Yokoi 
Imperial College London1, University of Barcelona2, Keio University3, University of Duisburg-Essen4, Queen's University5, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre6, University of Michigan7, University of São Paulo8, Yale University9, Northern General Hospital10, University of Caen Lower Normandy11, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center12, University of Oxford13, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center14, University of Sydney15, Sungkyunkwan University16, Seoul National University17, Kyorin University18, University of Copenhagen19, Nippon Medical School20, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven21, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center22, University of Antwerp23, Hyogo College of Medicine24, University of Western Australia25, Glenfield Hospital26, Cleveland Clinic27, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai28, University of Turin29, Université libre de Bruxelles30, Juntendo University31, National Cancer Research Institute32, Mayo Clinic33, University of Toronto34, Sinai Grace Hospital35, Netherlands Cancer Institute36, Hiroshima University37, City of Hope National Medical Center38, University of Chicago39, New York University40, Georgetown University41, University of Tokushima42, University of Pisa43, Osaka University44, University of Valencia45, Good Samaritan Hospital46, Military Medical Academy47, Fundación Favaloro48, Autonomous University of Barcelona49, Complutense University of Madrid50, University of Oviedo51, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens52, Rovira i Virgili University53, Autonomous University of Madrid54, Ghent University55
TL;DR: The methods used to evaluate the resultant Stage groupings and the proposals put forward for the 8th edition of the TNM Classification for lung cancer due to be published late 2016 are described.

2,826 citations