scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

João P. G. L. M. Rodrigues

Bio: João P. G. L. M. Rodrigues is an academic researcher from Stanford University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Macromolecular docking & Protein Data Bank. The author has an hindex of 22, co-authored 60 publications receiving 3370 citations. Previous affiliations of João P. G. L. M. Rodrigues include University of Aveiro & Utrecht University.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The updated version 2.2.2 of the HADDOCK portal is presented, which offers new features such as support for mixed molecule types, additional experimental restraints and improved protocols, all of this in a user-friendly interface.

1,762 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Protein binDIng enerGY prediction (PRODIGY), a web server to predict the binding affinity of protein-protein complexes from their 3D structure based on intermolecular contacts and properties derived from non-interface surface is presented.
Abstract: Gaining insights into the structural determinants of protein-protein interactions holds the key for a deeper understanding of biological functions, diseases and development of therapeutics. An important aspect of this is the ability to accurately predict the binding strength for a given protein-protein complex. Here we present PROtein binDIng enerGY prediction (PRODIGY), a web server to predict the binding affinity of protein-protein complexes from their 3D structure. The PRODIGY server implements our simple but highly effective predictive model based on intermolecular contacts and properties derived from non-interface surface. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: PRODIGY is freely available at: http://milou.science.uu.nl/services/PRODIGY CONTACT: a.m.j.j.bonvin@uu.nl, a.vangone@uu.nl.

628 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
25 Sep 2014-eLife
TL;DR: Analysis of correlated evolutionary sequence changes across proteins identifies residues that are close in space with sufficient accuracy to determine the three-dimensional structure of the protein complexes, and predicts protein–protein contacts in 32 complexes of unknown structure.
Abstract: DNA is often referred to as the ‘blueprint of life’, as this molecule contains the instructions that are required to build a living organism from a single cell. But these instructions largely play out through the proteins that DNA encodes; and most proteins do not work alone. Instead they come together in different combinations, or complexes, and a single protein may participate in many complexes with different activities. Proteins are so small that it is difficult to get clear information about what they look like. Visualizing protein complexes is even harder. Most protein–protein interactions remain poorly understood, even in the best-studied organisms such as humans, yeast, and bacteria. Proteins are made from smaller molecules, called amino acids, strung together one after the other. The order in which different amino acids are arranged in a protein determines the protein’s shape and ultimately its function. Like DNA, protein sequences can change over time. Sometimes, the sequence of one protein changes in a way that prevents it binding to another protein. If these two proteins must work together for an organism to survive, the second protein will often develop a compensating change that allows the protein–protein complex to reform. Identifying pairs of changes in the sequences of pairs of proteins suggests that the two proteins interact and gives some information about how the proteins fit together. Different species can have copies of the same proteins that have slightly different sequences. Since the DNA sequences from many different organisms are already known, there are now many opportunities to find sites in pairs of proteins that have evolved together, or co-evolved, over time. To find sites that seem to have co-evolved, Hopf et al. used a computer program based on an approach from statistical physics to look at pairs of proteins that were already known to form complexes. Co-evolving sites were found in over 300 pairs of proteins; including 76 where the structure of the complex was already known. When sites that were predicted to be co-evolving were then mapped to these known complex structures, the co-evolving sites were remarkably close to the true protein–protein contacts. This indicates that the information from the co-evolved sequences is sufficient to show how two proteins fit together. Hopf et al. then turned their attention to 82 pairs of proteins that were thought to interact, but where a structure was unavailable. For 32 of these pairs, structures of the entire complex could be predicted, showing how the two proteins might interact. Furthermore, when other researchers subsequently worked out the structure of one of these complexes, the prediction was a good match to the solved complex structure. The machinery of life is largely made up of proteins, which must interact in ever-changing but precise ways. The new methods developed by Hopf et al. provide a new way to discover and investigate the details of these interactions.

497 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Marc F. Lensink, Sameer Velankar1, Andriy Kryshtafovych, Shen You Huang2, Dina Schneidman-Duhovny, Andrej Sali3, Joan Segura4, Narcis Fernandez-Fuentes5, Shruthi Viswanath6, Ron Elber6, Sergei Grudinin7, Petr Popov7, Emilie Neveu7, Hasup Lee, Minkyung Baek, Sangwoo Park, Lim Heo, Gyu Rie Lee, Chaok Seok, Sanbo Qin8, Huan-Xiang Zhou8, David W. Ritchie9, Bernard Maigret10, Marie-Dominique Devignes10, Anisah W. Ghoorah11, Mieczyslaw Torchala12, Raphael A. G. Chaleil12, Paul A. Bates12, Efrat Ben-Zeev13, Miriam Eisenstein13, Surendra S. Negi14, Zhiping Weng15, Thom Vreven15, Brian G. Pierce15, Tyler M. Borrman15, Jinchao Yu16, Françoise Ochsenbein16, Raphael Guerois16, Anna Vangone, João P. G. L. M. Rodrigues, Gydo C. P. van Zundert, Mehdi Nellen, Li C. Xue, Ezgi Karaca, Adrien S. J. Melquiond, Koen M. Visscher, Panagiotis L. Kastritis, Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin, Xianjin Xu, Liming Qiu, Chengfei Yan, Jilong Li, Zhiwei Ma, Jianlin Cheng, Xiaoqin Zou, Yang Shen17, Lenna X. Peterson18, Hyung Rae Kim18, Amit Roy18, Amit Roy19, Xusi Han18, Juan Esquivel-Rodríguez18, Daisuke Kihara18, Xiaofeng Yu20, Neil J. Bruce20, Jonathan C. Fuller20, Rebecca C. Wade21, Ivan Anishchenko22, Petras J. Kundrotas22, Ilya A. Vakser22, Kenichiro Imai23, Kazunori D. Yamada23, Toshiyuki Oda23, Tsukasa Nakamura24, Kentaro Tomii23, Chiara Pallara, Miguel Romero-Durana, Brian Jiménez-García, Iain H. Moal, Juan Fernández-Recio, Jong Young Joung25, Jong Yun Kim25, Keehyoung Joo25, Jooyoung Lee26, Jooyoung Lee25, Dima Kozakov27, Sandor Vajda27, Scott E. Mottarella27, David R. Hall27, Dmitri Beglov27, Artem B. Mamonov27, Bing Xia27, Tanggis Bohnuud27, Carlos A. Del Carpio28, Carlos A. Del Carpio29, Eichiro Ichiishi30, Nicholas A. Marze, Daisuke Kuroda, Shourya S. Roy Burman, Jeffrey J. Gray31, Edrisse Chermak32, Luigi Cavallo32, Romina Oliva33, Andrey Tovchigrechko34, Shoshana J. Wodak 
01 Jun 2016-Proteins
TL;DR: Results show that the prediction of homodimer assemblies by homology modeling techniques and docking calculations is quite successful for targets featuring large enough subunit interfaces to represent stable associations, and that docking procedures tend to perform better than standard homology modeled techniques.
Abstract: We present the results for CAPRI Round 30, the first joint CASP-CAPRI experiment, which brought together experts from the protein structure prediction and protein-protein docking communities. The Round comprised 25 targets from amongst those submitted for the CASP11 prediction experiment of 2014. The targets included mostly homodimers, a few homotetramers, and two heterodimers, and comprised protein chains that could readily be modeled using templates from the Protein Data Bank. On average 24 CAPRI groups and 7 CASP groups submitted docking predictions for each target, and 12 CAPRI groups per target participated in the CAPRI scoring experiment. In total more than 9500 models were assessed against the 3D structures of the corresponding target complexes. Results show that the prediction of homodimer assemblies by homology modeling techniques and docking calculations is quite successful for targets featuring large enough subunit interfaces to represent stable associations. Targets with ambiguous or inaccurate oligomeric state assignments, often featuring crystal contact-sized interfaces, represented a confounding factor. For those, a much poorer prediction performance was achieved, while nonetheless often providing helpful clues on the correct oligomeric state of the protein. The prediction performance was very poor for genuine tetrameric targets, where the inaccuracy of the homology-built subunit models and the smaller pair-wise interfaces severely limited the ability to derive the correct assembly mode. Our analysis also shows that docking procedures tend to perform better than standard homology modeling techniques and that highly accurate models of the protein components are not always required to identify their association modes with acceptable accuracy. Proteins 2016; 84(Suppl 1):323-348. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

139 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The active-state structure of a GPCR occupied by a partial agonist, β2AR with salmeterol, together with mutagenesis and biophysical studies, explains this ligand's unusual pharmacological profile.
Abstract: Salmeterol is a partial agonist for the β2 adrenergic receptor (β2AR) and the first long-acting β2AR agonist to be widely used clinically for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Salmeterol's safety and mechanism of action have both been controversial. To understand its unusual pharmacological action and partial agonism, we obtained the crystal structure of salmeterol-bound β2AR in complex with an active-state-stabilizing nanobody. The structure reveals the location of the salmeterol exosite, where sequence differences between β1AR and β2AR explain the high receptor-subtype selectivity. A structural comparison with the β2AR bound to the full agonist epinephrine reveals differences in the hydrogen-bond network involving residues Ser2045.43 and Asn2936.55. Mutagenesis and biophysical studies suggested that these interactions lead to a distinct active-state conformation that is responsible for the partial efficacy of G-protein activation and the limited β-arrestin recruitment for salmeterol.

138 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An update to the SWISS-MODEL server is presented, which includes the implementation of a new modelling engine, ProMod3, and the introduction a new local model quality estimation method, QMEANDisCo.
Abstract: Homology modelling has matured into an important technique in structural biology, significantly contributing to narrowing the gap between known protein sequences and experimentally determined structures. Fully automated workflows and servers simplify and streamline the homology modelling process, also allowing users without a specific computational expertise to generate reliable protein models and have easy access to modelling results, their visualization and interpretation. Here, we present an update to the SWISS-MODEL server, which pioneered the field of automated modelling 25 years ago and been continuously further developed. Recently, its functionality has been extended to the modelling of homo- and heteromeric complexes. Starting from the amino acid sequences of the interacting proteins, both the stoichiometry and the overall structure of the complex are inferred by homology modelling. Other major improvements include the implementation of a new modelling engine, ProMod3 and the introduction a new local model quality estimation method, QMEANDisCo. SWISS-MODEL is freely available at https://swissmodel.expasy.org.

7,022 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The updated version 2.2.2 of the HADDOCK portal is presented, which offers new features such as support for mixed molecule types, additional experimental restraints and improved protocols, all of this in a user-friendly interface.

1,762 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This protocol describes the use of the various options, the construction of auxiliary restraints files, the selection of the energy parameters, and the analysis of the results of the ClusPro server.
Abstract: The ClusPro server (https://cluspro.org) is a widely used tool for protein-protein docking. The server provides a simple home page for basic use, requiring only two files in Protein Data Bank (PDB) format. However, ClusPro also offers a number of advanced options to modify the search; these include the removal of unstructured protein regions, application of attraction or repulsion, accounting for pairwise distance restraints, construction of homo-multimers, consideration of small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) data, and location of heparin-binding sites. Six different energy functions can be used, depending on the type of protein. Docking with each energy parameter set results in ten models defined by centers of highly populated clusters of low-energy docked structures. This protocol describes the use of the various options, the construction of auxiliary restraints files, the selection of the energy parameters, and the analysis of the results. Although the server is heavily used, runs are generally completed in <4 h.

1,699 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: Why interactome networks are important to consider in biology, how they can be mapped and integrated with each other, what global properties are starting to emerge from interactome network models, and how these properties may relate to human disease are detailed.
Abstract: Complex biological systems and cellular networks may underlie most genotype to phenotype relationships. Here, we review basic concepts in network biology, discussing different types of interactome networks and the insights that can come from analyzing them. We elaborate on why interactome networks are important to consider in biology, how they can be mapped and integrated with each other, what global properties are starting to emerge from interactome network models, and how these properties may relate to human disease.

1,323 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Lipid droplet biogenesis and degradation, as well as their interactions with other organelles, are tightly coupled to cellular metabolism and are critical to buffer the levels of toxic lipid species.
Abstract: Lipid droplets are storage organelles at the centre of lipid and energy homeostasis. They have a unique architecture consisting of a hydrophobic core of neutral lipids, which is enclosed by a phospholipid monolayer that is decorated by a specific set of proteins. Originating from the endoplasmic reticulum, lipid droplets can associate with most other cellular organelles through membrane contact sites. It is becoming apparent that these contacts between lipid droplets and other organelles are highly dynamic and coupled to the cycles of lipid droplet expansion and shrinkage. Importantly, lipid droplet biogenesis and degradation, as well as their interactions with other organelles, are tightly coupled to cellular metabolism and are critical to buffer the levels of toxic lipid species. Thus, lipid droplets facilitate the coordination and communication between different organelles and act as vital hubs of cellular metabolism.

1,143 citations