Joel West

Bio: Joel West is an academic researcher from Keck Graduate Institute of Applied Life Sciences. The author has contributed to research in topics: Open innovation & Business model. The author has an hindex of 36, co-authored 117 publications receiving 12259 citations. Previous affiliations of Joel West include California State University & University of California, Irvine.

Open innovation : researching a new paradigm

Abstract: 1 Open Innovation: A New Paradigm for Understanding Industrial Innovation SECTION I: FIRMS IMPLEMENTING OPEN INNOVATION 2 New Puzzles and New Findings 3 Whither Core Competency for the Large Corporation in an Open Innovation World? 4 Open, Radical Innovation: Toward an Integrated Model in Large Established Firms 5 Patterns of Open Innovation in Open Source Software SECTION II: INSTITUTIONS GOVERNING OPEN INNOVATION 6 Does Appropriability Enable or Retard Open Innovation? 7 The Use of University Research in Firm Innovation 8 Open Standards and Intellectual Property Rights 9 The Use of Intellectual Property in Software: Implications for Open Innovation SECTION III: NETWORKS SHAPING OPEN INNOVATION 10 The Inter-organizational Context of Open Innovation 11 Knowledge Networks and the Geographic Locus of Innovation 12 Open Innovation in Systemic Innovation Contexts 13 Open Innovation in Value Networks SECTION IV: CONCLUSIONS 14 Open Innovation: A Research Agenda

Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation

Abstract: This article reviews research on open innovation that considers how and why firms commercialize external sources of innovations. It examines both the “outside-in” and “coupled” modes of Enkel et al. (2009). From an analysis of prior research on how firms leverage external sources of innovation, it suggests a four-phase model in which a linear process — (1) obtaining, (2) integrating and (3) commercializing external innovations — is combined with (4) interaction between the firm and its collaborators. This model is used to classify papers taken from the top 25 innovation journals identified by Linton and Thongpapan (2004), complemented by highly cited work beyond those journals. A review of 291 open innovation-related publications from these sources shows that the majority of these articles indeed address elements of this inbound open innovation process model. Specifically, it finds that researchers have front-loaded their examination of the leveraging process, with an emphasis on obtaining innovations from external sources. However, there is a relative dearth of research related to integrating and commercializing these innovations.Research on obtaining innovations includes searching, enabling, filtering, and acquiring — each category with its own specific set of mechanisms and conditions. Integrating innovations has been mostly studied from an absorptive capacity perspective, with less attention given to the impact of competencies and culture (including not-invented-here). Commercializing innovations puts the most emphasis on how external innovations create value rather than how firms capture value from those innovations. Finally, the interaction phase considers both feedback for the linear process and reciprocal innovation processes such as co-creation, network collaboration and community innovation.This review and synthesis suggests several gaps in prior research. One is a tendency to ignore the importance of business models, despite their central role in distinguishing open innovation from earlier research on inter-organizational collaboration in innovation. Another gap is a tendency in open innovation to use “innovation” in a way inconsistent with earlier definitions in innovation management. The article concludes with recommendations for future research that include examining the end-to-end innovation commercialization process, and studying the moderators and limits of leveraging external sources of innovation.

Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open‐source software

Abstract: Open innovation is a powerful framework encompassing the generation, capture, and employment of intellectual property at the firm level. We identify three fundamental challenges for firms in applying the concept of open innovation: finding creative ways to exploit internal innovation, incorporating external innovation into internal development, and motivating outsiders to supply an ongoing stream of external innovations. This latter challenge involves a paradox, why would firms spend money on R&D efforts if the results of these efforts are available to rival firms? To explore these challenges, we examine the activity of firms in open source software to support their innovation strategies. Firms involved in open source software often make investments that will be shared with real and potential rivals. We identify four strategies firms employ — pooled R&D/product development, spinouts, selling complements and attracting donated complements — and discuss how they address the three key challenges of open innovation. We conclude with suggestions for how similar strategies may apply in other industries and offer some possible avenues for future research on open innovation.

An Overview of Innovation

Abstract: Models that depict innovation as a smooth, well-behaved linear process badly misspecify the nature and direction of the causal factors at work. Innovation is complex, uncertain, somewhat disorderly, and subject to changes of many sorts. Innovation is also difficult to measure and demands close coordination of adequate technical knowledge and excellent market judgment in order to satisfy economic, technological, and other types of constraints—all simultaneously. The process of innovation must be viewed as a series of changes in a complete system not only of hardware, but also of market environment, production facilities and knowledge, and the social contexts of the innovation organization.