Author
John C. Rothwell
Other affiliations: University College London
Bio: John C. Rothwell is an academic researcher from UCL Institute of Neurology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Transcranial magnetic stimulation & Motor cortex. The author has an hindex of 108, co-authored 619 publications receiving 40444 citations. Previous affiliations of John C. Rothwell include University College London.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
The Catholic University of America1, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital2, University of Toronto3, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health4, Università Campus Bio-Medico5, University of Eastern Finland6, Monash University7, Medical University of South Carolina8, Paris 12 Val de Marne University9, University of Regensburg10, University of Brescia11, University of Göttingen12, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center13, University of Siena14, University College London15, Copenhagen University Hospital16, Fukushima Medical University17, University of Tübingen18
TL;DR: These guidelines provide an up-date of previous IFCN report on “Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application” and include some recent extensions and developments.
1,850 citations
University of Göttingen1, City College of New York2, University of São Paulo3, University of Toronto4, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg5, Aalborg University6, Greifswald University Hospital7, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital8, Medical University of South Carolina9, University of Pennsylvania10, Technische Universität Ilmenau11, University of Oldenburg12, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne13, Paris 12 Val de Marne University14, University of New South Wales15, University of Aberdeen16, University of Trento17, University of Lisbon18, University of Kiel19, Ruhr University Bochum20, Technical University of Dortmund21, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich22, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center23, Mannheim University of Applied Sciences24, University of Siena25, The Catholic University of America26, University College London27, University of Copenhagen28, Fukushima Medical University29, Massachusetts Institute of Technology30, University of Tübingen31
TL;DR: Structured interviews are provided and recommend their use in future controlled studies, in particular when trying to extend the parameters applied, to discuss recent regulatory issues, reporting practices and ethical issues.
699 citations
TL;DR: A bimodal balance–recovery model is suggested that links interhemispheric balancing and functional recovery to the structural reserve spared by the lesion, which could enable NIBS to be tailored to the needs of individual patients.
Abstract: Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques can be used to monitor and modulate the excitability of intracortical neuronal circuits. Long periods of cortical stimulation can produce lasting effects on brain function, paving the way for therapeutic applications of NIBS in chronic neurological disease. The potential of NIBS in stroke rehabilitation has been of particular interest, because stroke is the main cause of permanent disability in industrial nations, and treatment outcomes often fail to meet the expectations of patients. Despite promising reports from many clinical trials on NIBS for stroke recovery, the number of studies reporting a null effect remains a concern. One possible explanation is that the interhemispheric competition model--which posits that suppressing the excitability of the hemisphere not affected by stroke will enhance recovery by reducing interhemispheric inhibition of the stroke hemisphere, and forms the rationale for many studies--is oversimplified or even incorrect. Here, we critically review the proposed mechanisms of synaptic and functional reorganization after stroke, and suggest a bimodal balance-recovery model that links interhemispheric balancing and functional recovery to the structural reserve spared by the lesion. The proposed model could enable NIBS to be tailored to the needs of individual patients.
570 citations
TL;DR: An up‐to‐date review of the available electrophysiological data and the impact on the understanding of human motor behaviour is presented and some of the gaps in the present knowledge as well as future directions of research are discussed in a format accessible to new students and/or investigators.
Abstract: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was initially used to evaluate the integrity of the corticospinal tract in humans non-invasively. Since these early studies, the development of paired-pulse and repetitive TMS protocols allowed investigators to explore inhibitory and excitatory interactions of various motor and non-motor cortical regions within and across cerebral hemispheres. These applications have provided insight into the intracortical physiological processes underlying the functional role of different brain regions in various cognitive processes, motor control in health and disease and neuroplastic changes during recovery of function after brain lesions. Used in combination with neuroimaging tools, TMS provides valuable information on functional connectivity between different brain regions, and on the relationship between physiological processes and the anatomical configuration of specific brain areas and connected pathways. More recently, there has been increasing interest in the extent to which these physiological processes are modulated depending on the behavioural setting. The purpose of this paper is (a) to present an up-to-date review of the available electrophysiological data and the impact on our understanding of human motor behaviour and (b) to discuss some of the gaps in our present knowledge as well as future directions of research in a format accessible to new students and/or investigators. Finally, areas of uncertainty and limitations in the interpretation of TMS studies are discussed in some detail.
544 citations
TL;DR: The aim of this article is to review critically the properties of the different currently used stimulation protocols, including a focus on their particular strengths and weaknesses, to facilitate their appropriate and conscientious application.
532 citations
Cited by
More filters
28 Jul 2005
TL;DR: PfPMP1）与感染红细胞、树突状组胞以及胎盘的单个或多个受体作用，在黏附及免疫逃避中起关键的作�ly.
Abstract: 抗原变异可使得多种致病微生物易于逃避宿主免疫应答。表达在感染红细胞表面的恶性疟原虫红细胞表面蛋白1（PfPMP1）与感染红细胞、内皮细胞、树突状细胞以及胎盘的单个或多个受体作用，在黏附及免疫逃避中起关键的作用。每个单倍体基因组var基因家族编码约60种成员，通过启动转录不同的var基因变异体为抗原变异提供了分子基础。
18,940 citations
TL;DR: The results suggest that it is important to recognize both the unity and diversity ofExecutive functions and that latent variable analysis is a useful approach to studying the organization and roles of executive functions.
12,182 citations
9,362 citations
TL;DR: The present updated guidelines review issues of risk and safety of conventional TMS protocols, address the undesired effects and risks of emerging TMS interventions, the applications of TMS in patients with implanted electrodes in the central nervous system, and safety aspects of T MS in neuroimaging environments.
4,447 citations
TL;DR: A very rapid method of conditioning the human motor cortex using rTMS that produces a controllable, consistent, long-lasting, and powerful effect on motor cortex physiology and behavior after an application period of only 20-190 s is described.
3,211 citations