Experience and Educationis the best concise statement on education ever published by John Dewey, the man acknowledged to be the pre-eminent educational theorist of the twentieth century. Written more than two decades after Democracy and Education(Dewey's most comprehensive statement of his position in educational philosophy), this book demonstrates how Dewey reformulated his ideas as a result of his intervening experience with the progressive schools and in the light of the criticisms his theories had received. Analysing both "traditional" and "progressive" education, Dr. Dewey here insists that neither the old nor the new education is adequate and that each is miseducative because neither of them applies the principles of a carefully developed philosophy of experience. Many pages of this volume illustrate Dr. Dewey's ideas for a philosophy of experience and its relation to education. He particularly urges that all teachers and educators looking for a new movement in education should think in terms of the deeped and larger issues of education rather than in terms of some divisive "ism" about education, even such an "ism" as "progressivism." His philosophy, here expressed in its most essential, most readable form, predicates an American educational system that respects all sources of experience, on that offers a true learning situation that is both historical and social, both orderly and dynamic.

经验与教育 = Experience and education

What makes organizations so similar? We contend that the engine of rationalization and bureaucratization has moved from the competitive marketplace to the state and the professions. Once a set of organizations emerges as a field, a paradox arises: rational actors make their organizations increasingly similar as they try to change them. We describe three isomorphic processes-coercive, mimetic, and normative—leading to this outcome. We then specify hypotheses about the impact of resource centralization and dependency, goal ambiguity and technical uncertainty, and professionalization and structuration on isomorphic change. Finally, we suggest implications for theories of organizations and social change.

The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (Chinese Translation)

Science is a cumulative endeavour as new knowledge is often created in the process of interpreting and combining existing knowledge. This is why literature reviews have long played a decisive role in scholarship. The quality of literature reviews is particularly determined by the literature search process. As Sir Isaac Newton eminently put it: If I can see further, it is because I am standing on the shoulders of giants. Drawing on this metaphor, the goal of writing a literature review is to reconstruct the giant of accumulated knowledge in a specific domain. And in doing so, a literature search represents the fundamental first step that makes up the giant's skeleton and largely determines its reconstruction in the subsequent literature analysis. In this paper, we argue that the process of searching the literature must be comprehensibly described. Only then can readers assess the exhaustiveness of the review and other scholars in the field can more confidently (re)use the results in their own research. We set out to explore the methodological rigour of literature review articles published in ten major information systems (IS) journals and show that many of these reviews do not thoroughly document the process of literature search. The results drawn from our analysis lead us to call for more rigour in documenting the literature search process and to present guidelines for crafting a literature review and search in the IS domain.

/pdf/reconstructing-the-giant-on-the-importance-of-rigour-in-3vk3uj1l2o.pdf

Reconstructing the Giant: On the Importance of Rigour in Documenting the Literature Search Process

Empirical studies that use structural equation modeling (SEM) are widespread in information systems research. During the last few years, the component-based approach partial least squares (PLS) for testing structural models has become increasingly popular. At the same time, this approach's limitations have become a greater concern. Some researchers even suggest using alternative approaches that are considered superior to PLS. However, we believe that PLS is an adequate choice if the research problem meets certain characteristics and the technique is properly used. Thus, the intention of this article is to resolve potential uncertainties that researchers intending to use PLS might have. Consequently, we provide a nontechnical overview of PLS and outline the ongoing discourses on SEM in general and the PLS approach in particular. Furthermore, we present a basic framework for empirical research applying PLS as well as a detailed explanation of the different process steps. Finally, examples of information systems research using PLS are summarized to demonstrate its beneficial application and the appropriateness of the proposed framework. This article can serve as a helpful guide for inexperienced researchers applying PLS for the first time, but also as a reference guide for researchers with a better understanding of the field. Keywords: structural equation modeling, partial least squares, information systems research I. INTRODUCTION The information systems (IS) discipline examines socioeconomic systems that are characterized by the interplay between hardware and software on the one hand, as well as individuals, groups, and organizations on the other. For example, technology adoption, acceptance, and success, as well as the conditions under which these can be achieved are typical issues that are addressed by IS research. These research fields are similar in that their investigation requires the researcher to cope with constructs such as the beliefs, perceptions, motivation, attitude, or judgments of the individuals involved. These constructs are usually modeled as latent variables (LVs) that can be measured only through a set of indicators. Structural equation models describe the relationships between several of these LVs. A number of algorithms and software programs are available to estimate their relationships based on a dataset. Among these algorithms, the partial least squares (PLS) algorithm has become increasingly popular both in IS research and in other disciplines such as marketing (Albers 2010; Henseler et al. 2009) or strategic management (Hulland 1999). However, reminders of this approach's limitations have recently become more prominent. Consequently, researchers opt for a more careful application of PLS. Especially its statistical power at small sample sizes, the overall model fit, as well as the misspecification of measurement models have been the focus of recent discussions. To resolve the uncertainties that researchers intending to use PLS might have, we investigate current discourses on the PLS approach. In the following sections, we: * demonstrate the increasing popularity of PLS in the IS research community * outline the PLS approach by providing a nontechnical overview and reflecting on the ongoing discussion on structural equation modeling (SEM) in general and on PLS in particular * discuss differences between PLS and covariance-based approaches * present a basic framework for empirical research applying the PLS approach * provide examples of its beneficial application in IS research As a result, this paper helps SEM beginners and advanced researchers to make an informed decision about whether to use SEM or other alternative approaches to SEM. Even more, we present up-to-date recommendations on how to apply PLS appropriately. Section II demonstrates the increasing popularity of PLS for SEM in IS research by conducting a systematic review of literature that appeared in two prestigious IS journals during the last fifteen years. …

/pdf/structural-equation-modeling-in-information-systems-research-2jjhybpjex.pdf

Structural Equation Modeling in Information Systems Research Using Partial Least Squares

https://ira.lib.polyu.edu.hk/bitstream/10397/1269/1/SetupSurvey-2006%28June-19%29.pdf

A survey of scheduling problems with setup times or costs

This paper considers a single-machine scheduling problem in which penalities occur when a job is completed early or late. The objective is to minimize the total penalty subject to restrictive assumptions on the due dates and penalty functions for jobs. A procedure is presented for finding an optimal schedule.

Minimizing the average deviation of job completion times about a common due date

This paper addresses the problem of n jobs to be scheduled on a single machine in such a way that flow time variation is minimized. When the measure of variation is total absolute difference of completion times TADC the problem is shown to be quite simple. Sufficient conditions are shown for minimal TADC and a simple method for generating an optimal solution is provided.

When the measure of variation is variance of flow time the problem is much more difficult. For this case a heuristic method for scheduling is proposed. The heuristic is simple and provides solutions which compare favorably with others found in the literature.

Minimizing Variation of Flow Time in Single Machine Systems

Job shop scheduling with modified due dates

In the context of production scheduling, inserted idle time (IIT) occurs whenever a resource is deliberately kept idle in the face of waiting jobs. IIT schedules are particularly relevant in multimachine industrial situations where earliness costs and/or dynamically arriving jobs with due dates come into play. We provide a taxonomy of environments in which IIT scheduling is relevant, review the extant literature on IIT scheduling, and identify areas of opportunity for future research.

/pdf/scheduling-with-inserted-idle-time-problem-taxonomy-and-1dc17f7krh.pdf

John J. Kanet

Papers

Minimizing the average deviation of job completion times about a common due date

Minimizing Variation of Flow Time in Single Machine Systems

Job shop scheduling with modified due dates

Scheduling with Inserted Idle Time: Problem Taxonomy and Literature Review

Priority dispatching with operation due dates in a job shop