scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

John Mahoney

Bio: John Mahoney is an academic researcher from World Health Organization. The author has contributed to research in topics: Mental health & Public health. The author has an hindex of 3, co-authored 3 publications receiving 847 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Barriers to progress in improvement of mental health services can be overcome by generation of political will for the organisation of accessible and humane mental health care, a qualitative survey of international mental health experts and leaders suggests.

881 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The early response and community level work is described as well as how this has led to a new level of disaster preparedness and a new national mental health policy and proposals for new mental health legislation.
Abstract: This paper describes the mental health and psychosocial response to the Boxing Day tsunami in Sri Lanka. The need to deal with the immediate psychological distress of survivors and provide psychoso...

27 citations

01 Jan 2007
TL;DR: Barriers to progress in improvement of mental health services can be overcome by generation of political will for the organisation of accessible and humane mental health care, according to a qualitative survey of international mental health experts and leaders.
Abstract: Despite the publication of high-profi le reports and promising activities in several countries, progress in mental health service development has been slow in most low-income and middle-income countries. We reviewed barriers to mental health service development through a qualitative survey of international mental health experts and leaders. Barriers include the prevailing public-health priority agenda and its eff ect on funding; the complexity of and resistance to decentralisation of mental health services; challenges to implementation of mental health care in primary-care settings; the low numbers and few types of workers who are trained and supervised in mental health care; and the frequent scarcity of public-health perspectives in mental health leadership. Many of the barriers to progress in improvement of mental health services can be overcome by generation of political will for the organisation of accessible and humane mental health care. Advocates for people with mental disorders will need to clarify and collaborate on their messages. Resistance to decentralisation of resources must be overcome, especially in many mental health professionals and hospital workers. Mental health investments in primary care are important but are unlikely to be sustained unless they are preceded or accompanied by the development of community mental health services, to allow for training, supervision, and continuous support for primary care workers. Mobilisation and recognition of non-formal resources in the community must be stepped up. Community members without formal professional training and people who have mental disorders and their family members, need to partake in advocacy and service delivery. Population-wide progress in access to humane mental health care will depend on substantially more attention to politics, leadership, planning, advocacy, and participation.

17 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper , a framework for comprehensive, collaborative, and community-based care (C4) for accessible mental health services in low-resource settings is proposed, which is based on task-shifting of services to non-specialized workers.
Abstract: Abstract This paper proposes a framework for comprehensive, collaborative, and community-based care (C4) for accessible mental health services in low-resource settings. Because mental health conditions have many causes, this framework includes social, public health, wellness and clinical services. It accommodates integration of stand-alone mental health programs with health and non-health community-based services. It addresses gaps in previous models including lack of community-based psychotherapeutic and social services, difficulty in addressing comorbidity of mental and physical conditions, and how workers interact with respect to referral and coordination of care. The framework is based on task-shifting of services to non-specialized workers. While the framework draws on the World Health Organization’s Mental Health Gap Action Program and other global mental health models, there are important differences. The C4 Framework delineates types of workers based on their skills. Separate workers focus on: basic psychoeducation and information sharing; community-level, evidence-based psychotherapeutic counseling; and primary medical care and more advanced, specialized mental health services for more severe or complex cases. This paper is intended for individuals, organizations and governments interested in implementing mental health services. The primary aim is to provide a framework for the provision of widely accessible mental health care and services.

Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2010 (GBD 2010) as discussed by the authors was used to estimate the burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders in terms of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), years of life lost to premature mortality (YLLs), and years lived with disability (YLDs).

4,753 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Substantial differences between the results and prevalence, disability, and treatment rate estimates used in the analysis of global burden of disease for China draw attention to the need for low-income and middle-income countries to do detailed, country-specific situation analyses before they scale up mental health services.

902 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is recommended that policymakers should act on the available evidence to scale up effective and cost-effective treatments and preventive interventions for mental disorders and community-based rehabilitation models provide a low-cost, integrative framework for care of children and adults with chronic mental disabilities.

787 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is argued that a basic, evidence-based package of services for core mental disorders should be scaled up, and that protection of the human rights of people with mental disorders and their families should be strengthened.

704 citations