J
John Monahan
Researcher at University of Virginia
Publications - 332
Citations - 22677
John Monahan is an academic researcher from University of Virginia. The author has contributed to research in topics: Poison control & Mental health. The author has an hindex of 72, co-authored 313 publications receiving 21833 citations. Previous affiliations of John Monahan include University of California, San Francisco & City University of New York.
Papers
More filters
Posted Content
Tarasoff at Thirty: How Developments in Science and Policy Shape the Common Law
TL;DR: In an article for a symposium issue of the Cincinnati Law Review on the thirtieth anniversary of the Tarasoff decision, finding therapists potentially liable in tort for the violent acts of their patients, this paper addressed two types of change that have occurred in the past three decades: change in the science of violence risk assessment, and change in American mental health policy.
Journal ArticleDOI
Interventions by Virginia's Colleges to Respond to Student Mental Health Crises
TL;DR: Most four-year colleges in Virginia, both public and private, occasionally invoke a variety of protective interventions to respond to apparent mental health crises experienced by students, but the number of students annually affected by these policies is generally small.
Journal ArticleDOI
Using administrative data to identify U.S. Army soldiers at high-risk of perpetrating minor violent crimes
Anthony J. Rosellini,John Monahan,Amy E. Street,Amy E. Street,Eric Hill,Maria Petukhova,Ben Y. Reis,Nancy A. Sampson,David M. Benedek,Paul D. Bliese,Murray B. Stein,Murray B. Stein,Robert J. Ursano,Ronald C. Kessler +13 more
TL;DR: The results suggest that it may be possible to target soldiers at high-risk of violence perpetration for preventive interventions, although final decisions about such interventions would require weighing predicted effectiveness against intervention costs and competing risks.
Journal ArticleDOI
Impact of risk assessment on judges' fairness in sentencing relatively poor defendants.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors tested whether risk assessment information interacts with a defendant's socioeconomic class to influence judges' sentencing decisions, and found that risk assessment may have transformed low socioeconomic status from a circumstance that reduced the likelihood of incarceration (by mitigating perceived blameworthiness) to a factor that increased the likelihood for incarceration, by increasing perceived risk.