John Newborough

Bio: John Newborough is an academic researcher from University of York. The author has contributed to research in topics: Swarm intelligence & Evolutionary algorithm. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 1 publications receiving 20 citations.

A generic framework for population-based algorithms, implemented on multiple FPGAs

Abstract: Many bio-inspired algorithms (evolutionary algorithms, artificial immune systems, particle swarm optimisation, ant colony optimisation,...) are based on populations of agents. Stepney et al [2005] argue for the use of conceptual frameworks and meta-frameworks to capture the principles and commonalities underlying these, and other bio-inspired algorithms. Here we outline a generic framework that captures a collection of population-based algorithms, allowing commonalities to be factored out, and properties previously thought particular to one class of algorithms to be applied uniformly across all the algorithms. We then describe a prototype proof-of-concept implementation of this framework on a small grid of FPGA (field programmable gate array) chips, thus demonstrating a generic architecture for both parallelism (on a single chip) and distribution (across the grid of chips) of the algorithms.

Application areas of AIS: The past, the present and the future

Abstract: After a decade of research into the area of artificial immune systems, it is worthwhile to take a step back and reflect on the contributions that the paradigm has brought to the application areas to which it has been applied. Undeniably, there have been a lot of successful stories-however, if the field is to advance in the future and really carve out its own distinctive niche, then it is necessary to be able to illustrate that there are clear benefits to be obtained by applying this paradigm rather than others. This paper attempts to take stock of the application areas that have been tackled in the past, and ask the difficult question ''was it worth it ?''. We then attempt to suggest a set of problem features that we believe will allow the true potential of the immunological system to be exploited in computational systems, and define a unique niche for AIS.

Application areas of AIS: the past, present and future.

Abstract: After a decade of research into the area of artificial immune systems, it is worthwhile to take a step back and reflect on the contributions that the paradigm has brought to the application areas to which it has been applied. Undeniably, there have been a lot of successful stories—however, if the field is to advance in the future and really carve out its own distinctive niche, then it is necessary to be able to illustrate that there are clear benefits to be obtained by applying this paradigm rather than others. This paper attempts to take stock of the application areas that have been tackled in the past, and ask the difficult question ‘‘was it worth it ?’’. We then attempt to suggest a set of problem features that we believe will allow the true potential of the immunological system to be exploited in computational systems, and define a unique niche for AIS

Artificial immune systems---today and tomorrow

Abstract: In this position paper, we argue that the field of artificial immune systems (AIS) has reached an impasse. For many years, immune inspired algorithms, whilst having some degree of success, have been limited by the lack of theoretical advances, the adoption of a naive immune inspired approach and the limited application of AIS to challenging problems. We review the current state of the AIS approach, and suggest a number of challenges to the AIS community that can be undertaken to help move the area forward.

An interdisciplinary perspective on artificial immune systems

Abstract: This review paper attempts to position the area of Artificial Immune Systems (AIS) in a broader context of interdisciplinary research. We review AIS based on an established conceptual framework that encapsulates mathematical and computational modelling of immunology, abstraction and then development of engineered systems. We argue that AIS are much more than engineered systems inspired by the immune system and that there is a great deal for both immunology and engineering to learn from each other through working in an interdisciplinary manner.

Application areas of AIS: the past, the present and the future

Abstract: After a decade of research into the area of Artificial Immune Systems, it is worthwhile to take a step back and reflect on the contributions that the paradigm has brought to the application areas to which it has been applied. Undeniably, there have been a lot of successful stories — however, if the field is to advance in the future and really carve out its own distinctive niche, then it is necessary to be able to illustrate that there are clear benefits to be obtained by applying this paradigm rather than others. This paper attempts to take stock of the application areas that have been tackled in the past, and ask the difficult question “was it worth it ?”. We then attempt to suggest a set of problem features that we believe will allow the true potential of the immunological system to be exploited in computational systems, and define a unique niche for AIS.