scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Jonathan De Venter

Bio: Jonathan De Venter is an academic researcher from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. The author has contributed to research in topics: Evolving networks. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 1 publications receiving 2 citations.

Papers
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
16 Sep 2019
TL;DR: The results show that no single best performing community detection technique exists, but rather, the choice of the method depends on the objective and dataset characteristics.
Abstract: Community detection has recently received increased attention due to its wide range of applications in many fields. While at first most techniques were focused on discovering communities in static networks, lately the focus has shifted toward evolving networks because of their high relevance in real-life problems. Given the increasing number of the methods being proposed, this paper explores the current availability of empirical comparative studies of dynamic methods and also provides its own qualitative and quantitative comparison with the aim of gaining more insight in the performance of available methods. The results show that no single best performing community detection technique exists, but rather, the choice of the method depends on the objective and dataset characteristics.

3 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compare six algorithms for dynamic community detection in terms of instantaneous and longitudinal similarity with the planted ground truth, smoothness of dynamic partitions, and scalability.
Abstract: Many algorithms have been proposed in the last ten years for the discovery of dynamic communities. However, these methods are seldom compared between themselves. In this article, we propose a generator of dynamic graphs with planted evolving community structure, as a benchmark to compare and evaluate such algorithms. Unlike previously proposed benchmarks, it is able to specify any desired evolving community structure through a descriptive language, and then to generate the corresponding progressively evolving network. We empirically evaluate six existing algorithms for dynamic community detection in terms of instantaneous and longitudinal similarity with the planted ground truth, smoothness of dynamic partitions, and scalability. We notably observe different types of weaknesses depending on their approach to ensure smoothness, namely Glitches, Oversimplification and Identity loss. Although no method arises as a clear winner, we observe clear differences between methods, and we identified the fastest, those yielding the most smoothed or the most accurate solutions at each step.

10 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Wang et al. as discussed by the authors proposed a dynamic community detection algorithm called, Dynamic Community Detection based on the Matthew effect (DCDME), which employs a batch processing method to reveal communities incrementally in each network snapshot.

7 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: This article empirically evaluate six existing algorithms for dynamic community detection in terms of instantaneous and longitudinal similarity with the planted ground truth, smoothness of dynamic partitions and scalability, and identifies the fastest, those yielding the most smoothed or the most accurate solutions at each step.
Abstract: Many algorithms have been proposed in the last ten years for the discovery of dynamic communities. However, these methods are seldom compared between themselves. In this article, we propose a generator of dynamic graphs with planted evolving community structure, as a benchmark to compare and evaluate such algorithms. Unlike previously proposed benchmarks, it is able to specify any desired evolving community structure through a descriptive language, and then to generate the corresponding progressively evolving network. We empirically evaluate six existing algorithms for dynamic community detection in terms of instantaneous and longitudinal similarity with the planted ground truth, smoothness of dynamic partitions, and scalability. We notably observe different types of weaknesses depending on their approach to ensure smoothness, namely Glitches, Oversimplification and Identity loss. Although no method arises as a clear winner, we observe clear differences between methods, and we identified the fastest, those yielding the most smoothed or the most accurate solutions at each step.

7 citations