scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Jonathan Mangion

Bio: Jonathan Mangion is an academic researcher from Institute of Cancer Research. The author has contributed to research in topics: Breast cancer & Cherubism. The author has an hindex of 10, co-authored 13 publications receiving 3693 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
30 Sep 1994-Science
TL;DR: This analysis localized a second breast cancer susceptibility locus, BRCA2, to a 6-centimorgan interval on chromosome 13q12-13, which preliminary evidence suggests suggests confers a high risk of breast cancer but does not confer a substantially elevated risk of ovarian cancer.
Abstract: A small proportion of breast cancer, in particular those cases arising at a young age, is due to the inheritance of dominant susceptibility genes conferring a high risk of the disease. A genomic linkage search was performed with 15 high-risk breast cancer families that were unlinked to the BRCA1 locus on chromosome 17q21. This analysis localized a second breast cancer susceptibility locus, BRCA2, to a 6-centimorgan interval on chromosome 13q12-13. Preliminary evidence suggests that BRCA2 confers a high risk of breast cancer but, unlike BRCA1, does not confer a substantially elevated risk of ovarian cancer.

1,933 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A family in which two brothers who both developed breast cancer had clinical and endocrinological evidence of androgen resistance is reported, the first report of a germline mutation in a member of the steroid/thyroid hormone receptor superfamily associated with the development of cancer.
Abstract: Breast cancer in men is rare--among the risk factors that have been identified are a family history of breast cancer and evidence of androgen insufficiency. We report a family in which two brothers who both developed breast cancer had clinical and endocrinological evidence of androgen resistance. Sequence analysis revealed a mutation in the androgen receptor gene on the X chromosome, within the region encoding the DNA binding domain. This is the first report of a germline mutation in a member of the steroid/thyroid hormone receptor superfamily associated with the development of cancer.

237 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Analysis by both parametric and nonparametric methods indicates that only a very small proportion of familial NMTC is attributable to MNG1, the gene encoding thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR), which is located on chromosome 14q, is outside the linked region.
Abstract: Thyroid goiter is a common condition that is often associated with iodine deficiency. Familial forms of goiter in areas not known to feature iodine deficiency are much less common. We have performed a genomic search on a single large Canadian family with 18 cases of nontoxic multinodular goiter in which 2 individuals also had papillary lesions highly suggestive of papillary carcinoma. A locus on chromosome 14q (MNG1 [multinodular goiter 1]) has been identified, with a maximal two-point LOD score of 3.8 at D14S1030 and a multipoint LOD score of 4.88 at the same marker, defined by D14S1062 (upper boundary) and D14S267 (lower boundary). The gene encoding thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR), which is located on chromosome 14q, is outside the linked region. To determine the role of this gene in familial nonmedullary thyroid cancer (NMTC), we studied 37 smaller pedigrees each containing at least two cases of NMTC. Analysis by both parametric and nonparametric methods indicates that only a very small proportion of familial NMTC (point estimate 0.001, support intervals 0-.6 under a dominant model) is attributable to MNG1.

199 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Using two families with clinically, radiologically, and/or histologically proved cherubism, a genomewide linkage search is performed and a strong candidate is the gene for fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3); mutations in this gene have been implicated in a diverse set of disorders of bone development.
Abstract: Summary Cherubism is a rare familial disease of childhood characterized by proliferative lesions within the mandible and maxilla that lead to prominence of the lower face and an appearance reminiscent of the cherubs portrayed in Renaissance art. Resolution of these bony abnormalities is often observed after puberty. Many cases are inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion, although several cases without a family history have been reported. Using two families with clinically, radiologically, and/or histologically proved cherubism, we have performed a genomewide linkage search and have localized the gene to chromosome 4p16.3, with a maximum multipoint LOD score of 5.64. Both families showed evidence of linkage to this locus. Critical meiotic recombinants place the gene in a 3-cM interval between D4S127 and 4p-telomere. Within this region a strong candidate is the gene for fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3); mutations in this gene have been implicated in a diverse set of disorders of bone development.

167 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
07 Oct 1994-Science
TL;DR: A strong candidate for the 17q-linked BRCA1 gene, which influences susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer, has been identified by positional cloning methods.
Abstract: A strong candidate for the 17q-linked BRCA1 gene, which influences susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer, has been identified by positional cloning methods. Probable predisposing mutations have been detected in five of eight kindreds presumed to segregate BRCA1 susceptibility alleles. The mutations include an 11-base pair deletion, a 1-base pair insertion, a stop codon, a missense substitution, and an inferred regulatory mutation. The BRCA1 gene is expressed in numerous tissues, including breast and ovary, and encodes a predicted protein of 1863 amino acids. This protein contains a zinc finger domain in its amino-terminal region, but is otherwise unrelated to previously described proteins. Identification of BRCA1 should facilitate early diagnosis of breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility in some individuals as well as a better understanding of breast cancer biology.

6,118 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
21 Dec 1995-Nature
TL;DR: The identification of a gene in which six different germline mutations in breast cancer families that are likely to be due to BRCA2 are detected, and results indicate that this is the BRC a2 gene.
Abstract: IN Western Europe and the United States approximately 1 in 12 women develop breast cancer. A small proportion of breast cancer cases, in particular those arising at a young age, are attributable to a highly penetrant, autosomal dominant predisposition to the disease. The breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA2, was recently localized to chromosome 13q12-q13. Here we report the identification of a gene in which we have detected six different germline mutations in breast cancer families that are likely to be due to BRCA2. Each mutation causes serious disruption to the open reading frame of the transcriptional unit. The results indicate that this is the BRCA2 gene.

3,333 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The lifetime risk of breast cancer appears similar to the risk in BRCA1 carriers, but there was some suggestion of a lower risk in bRCA2 carriers <50 years of age.
Abstract: The contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 to inherited breast cancer was assessed by linkage and mutation analysis in 237 families, each with at least four cases of breast cancer, collected by the Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Families were included without regard to the occurrence of ovarian or other cancers. Overall, disease was linked to BRCA1 in an estimated 52% of families, to BRCA2 in 32% of families, and to neither gene in 16% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6%-28%), suggesting other predisposition genes. The majority (81%) of the breast-ovarian cancer families were due to BRCA1, with most others (14%) due to BRCA2. Conversely, the majority of families with male and female breast cancer were due to BRCA2 (76%). The largest proportion (67%) of families due to other genes was found in families with four or five cases of female breast cancer only. These estimates were not substantially affected either by changing the assumed penetrance model for BRCA1 or by including or excluding BRCA1 mutation data. Among those families with disease due to BRCA1 that were tested by one of the standard screening methods, mutations were detected in the coding sequence or splice sites in an estimated 63% (95% CI 51%-77%). The estimated sensitivity was identical for direct sequencing and other techniques. The penetrance of BRCA2 was estimated by maximizing the LOD score in BRCA2-mutation families, over all possible penetrance functions. The estimated cumulative risk of breast cancer reached 28% (95% CI 9%-44%) by age 50 years and 84% (95% CI 43%-95%) by age 70 years. The corresponding ovarian cancer risks were 0.4% (95% CI 0%-1%) by age 50 years and 27% (95% CI 0%-47%) by age 70 years. The lifetime risk of breast cancer appears similar to the risk in BRCA1 carriers, but there was some suggestion of a lower risk in BRCA2 carriers <50 years of age.

2,892 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: There are several risk subgroups for which the available data are insufficient to recommend for or against screening, including women with a personal history of breast cancer, carcinoma in situ, atypical hyperplasia, and extremely dense breasts on mammography.
Abstract: New evidence on breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) screening has become available since the American Cancer Society (ACS) last issued guidelines for the early detection of breast cancer in 2003. A guideline panel has reviewed this evidence and developed new recommendations for women at different defined levels of risk. Screening MRI is recommended for women with an approximately 20-25% or greater lifetime risk of breast cancer, including women with a strong family history of breast or ovarian cancer and women who were treated for Hodgkin disease. There are several risk subgroups for which the available data are insufficient to recommend for or against screening, including women with a personal history of breast cancer, carcinoma in situ, atypical hyperplasia, and extremely dense breasts on mammography. Diagnostic uses of MRI were not considered to be within the scope of this review.

2,332 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Douglas F. Easton1, Karen A. Pooley1, Alison M. Dunning1, Paul D.P. Pharoah1, Deborah J. Thompson1, Dennis G. Ballinger, Jeffery P. Struewing2, Jonathan J. Morrison1, Helen I. Field1, Robert Luben1, Nicholas J. Wareham1, Shahana Ahmed1, Catherine S. Healey1, Richard Bowman, Kerstin B. Meyer1, Christopher A. Haiman3, Laurence K. Kolonel, Brian E. Henderson3, Loic Le Marchand, Paul Brennan4, Suleeporn Sangrajrang, Valerie Gaborieau4, Fabrice Odefrey4, Chen-Yang Shen5, Pei-Ei Wu5, Hui-Chun Wang5, Diana Eccles6, D. Gareth Evans7, Julian Peto8, Olivia Fletcher9, Nichola Johnson9, Sheila Seal, Michael R. Stratton10, Nazneen Rahman, Georgia Chenevix-Trench11, Georgia Chenevix-Trench12, Stig E. Bojesen13, Børge G. Nordestgaard13, C K Axelsson13, Montserrat Garcia-Closas2, Louise A. Brinton2, Stephen J. Chanock2, Jolanta Lissowska14, Beata Peplonska15, Heli Nevanlinna16, Rainer Fagerholm16, H Eerola16, Daehee Kang17, Keun-Young Yoo17, Dong-Young Noh17, Sei Hyun Ahn18, David J. Hunter19, Susan E. Hankinson19, David G. Cox19, Per Hall20, Sara Wedrén20, Jianjun Liu21, Yen-Ling Low21, Natalia Bogdanova22, Peter Schu¨rmann22, Do¨rk Do¨rk22, Rob A. E. M. Tollenaar23, Catharina E. Jacobi23, Peter Devilee23, Jan G. M. Klijn24, Alice J. Sigurdson2, Michele M. Doody2, Bruce H. Alexander25, Jinghui Zhang2, Angela Cox26, Ian W. Brock26, Gordon MacPherson26, Malcolm W.R. Reed26, Fergus J. Couch27, Ellen L. Goode27, Janet E. Olson27, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer28, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer24, Ans M.W. van den Ouweland24, André G. Uitterlinden24, Fernando Rivadeneira24, Roger L. Milne29, Gloria Ribas29, Anna González-Neira29, Javier Benitez29, John L. Hopper30, Margaret R. E. McCredie31, Margaret R. E. McCredie32, Margaret R. E. McCredie11, Melissa C. Southey11, Melissa C. Southey30, Graham G. Giles33, Chris Schroen30, Christina Justenhoven34, Christina Justenhoven35, Hiltrud Brauch34, Hiltrud Brauch35, Ute Hamann36, Yon-Dschun Ko, Amanda B. Spurdle12, Jonathan Beesley12, Xiaoqing Chen12, _ kConFab37, Arto Mannermaa37, Veli-Matti Kosma37, Vesa Kataja37, Jaana M. Hartikainen37, Nicholas E. Day1, David Cox, Bruce A.J. Ponder1 
28 Jun 2007-Nature
TL;DR: To identify further susceptibility alleles, a two-stage genome-wide association study in 4,398 breast cancer cases and 4,316 controls was conducted, followed by a third stage in which 30 single nucleotide polymorphisms were tested for confirmation.
Abstract: Breast cancer exhibits familial aggregation, consistent with variation in genetic susceptibility to the disease. Known susceptibility genes account for less than 25% of the familial risk of breast cancer, and the residual genetic variance is likely to be due to variants conferring more moderate risks. To identify further susceptibility alleles, we conducted a two-stage genome-wide association study in 4,398 breast cancer cases and 4,316 controls, followed by a third stage in which 30 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were tested for confirmation in 21,860 cases and 22,578 controls from 22 studies. We used 227,876 SNPs that were estimated to correlate with 77% of known common SNPs in Europeans at r2.0.5. SNPs in five novel independent loci exhibited strong and consistent evidence of association with breast cancer (P,1027). Four of these contain plausible causative genes (FGFR2, TNRC9, MAP3K1 and LSP1). At the second stage, 1,792 SNPs were significant at the P,0.05 level compared with an estimated 1,343 that would be expected by chance, indicating that many additional common susceptibility alleles may be identifiable by this approach.

2,288 citations