scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

José I. Martínez

Bio: José I. Martínez is an academic researcher from Spanish National Research Council. The author has contributed to research in topics: Density functional theory & Graphene. The author has an hindex of 31, co-authored 136 publications receiving 6188 citations. Previous affiliations of José I. Martínez include Donostia International Physics Center & Technical University of Denmark.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a large database of HO* and HOO* adsorption energies on oxide surfaces was used to analyze the reaction free energy diagrams of all the oxides in a general way.
Abstract: Trends in electrocatalytic activity of the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) are investigated on the basis of a large database of HO* and HOO* adsorption energies on oxide surfaces. The theoretical overpotential was calculated by applying standard density functional theory in combination with the computational standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) model. We showed that by the discovery of a universal scaling relation between the adsorption energies of HOO* vs HO*, it is possible to analyze the reaction free energy diagrams of all the oxides in a general way. This gave rise to an activity volcano that was the same for a wide variety of oxide catalyst materials and a universal descriptor for the oxygen evolution activity, which suggests a fundamental limitation on the maximum oxygen evolution activity of planar oxide catalysts.

2,923 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is shown that graphitic materials with active sites composed of 4 nitrogen atoms and transition metal atoms belonging to groups 7 to 9 in the periodic table are active towards ORR, and also towards Oxygen Evolution Reaction (OER) and that these catalysts trend-wise behave as oxides.
Abstract: Low-temperature fuel cells are appealing alternatives to the conventional internal combustion engines for transportation applications. However, in order for them to be commercially viable, effective, stable and low-cost electrocatalysts are needed for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction (ORR) at the cathode. In this contribution, on the basis of Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations, we show that graphitic materials with active sites composed of 4 nitrogen atoms and transition metal atoms belonging to groups 7 to 9 in the periodic table are active towards ORR, and also towards Oxygen Evolution Reaction (OER). Spin analyses suggest that the oxidation state of those elements in the active sites should in general be +2. Moreover, our results verify that the adsorption behavior of transition metals is not intrinsic, since it can be severely altered by changes in the local geometry of the active site, the chemical nature of the nearest neighbors, and the oxidation states. Nonetheless, we find that these catalysts trend-wise behave as oxides and that their catalytic activity is limited by exactly the same universal scaling relations.

413 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The trends in the adsorption energies of small oxygen- and hydrogen-containing adsorbates on Pt nanoparticles of various sizes and on extended surfaces were analyzed through DFT calculations by making use of the generalized coordination numbers of the surface sites, and it was shown that an approximate equivalence exists between generalized coordinationNumbers and d-band centers.
Abstract: Platinum is a prominent catalyst for a multiplicity of reactions because of its high activity and stability. As Pt nanoparticles are normally used to maximize catalyst utilization and to minimize catalyst loading, it is important to rationalize and predict catalytic activity trends in nanoparticles in simple terms, while being able to compare these trends with those of extended surfaces. The trends in the adsorption energies of small oxygen- and hydrogen-containing adsorbates on Pt nanoparticles of various sizes and on extended surfaces were analyzed through DFT calculations by making use of the generalized coordination numbers of the surface sites. This simple and predictive descriptor links the geometric arrangement of a surface to its adsorption properties. It generates linear adsorption-energy trends, captures finite-size effects, and provides more accurate descriptions than d-band centers and usual coordination numbers. Unlike electronic-structure descriptors, which require knowledge of the densities of states, it is calculated manually. Finally, it was shown that an approximate equivalence exists between generalized coordination numbers and d-band centers.

360 citations

DOI
Claudia Backes1, Claudia Backes2, Amr M. Abdelkader3, Concepción Alonso4, Amandine Andrieux-Ledier5, Raul Arenal6, Raul Arenal7, Jon Azpeitia7, Nilanthy Balakrishnan8, Luca Banszerus9, Julien Barjon5, Ruben Bartali10, Sebastiano Bellani11, Claire Berger12, Claire Berger13, Reinhard Berger14, M.M. Bernal Ortega15, Carlo Bernard16, Peter H. Beton8, André Beyer17, Alberto Bianco18, Peter Bøggild19, Francesco Bonaccorso11, Gabriela Borin Barin20, Cristina Botas, Rebeca A. Bueno7, Daniel Carriazo21, Andres Castellanos-Gomez7, Meganne Christian, Artur Ciesielski18, Tymoteusz Ciuk, Matthew T. Cole, Jonathan N. Coleman2, Camilla Coletti11, Luigi Crema10, Huanyao Cun16, Daniela Dasler22, Domenico De Fazio3, Noel Díez, Simon Drieschner23, Georg S. Duesberg24, Roman Fasel25, Roman Fasel20, Xinliang Feng14, Alberto Fina15, Stiven Forti11, Costas Galiotis26, Costas Galiotis27, Giovanni Garberoglio28, Jorge M. Garcia7, Jose A. Garrido, Marco Gibertini29, Armin Gölzhäuser17, Julio Gómez, Thomas Greber16, Frank Hauke22, Adrian Hemmi16, Irene Hernández-Rodríguez7, Andreas Hirsch22, Stephen A. Hodge3, Yves Huttel7, Peter Uhd Jepsen19, I. Jimenez7, Ute Kaiser30, Tommi Kaplas31, HoKwon Kim29, Andras Kis29, Konstantinos Papagelis32, Konstantinos Papagelis27, Kostas Kostarelos33, Aleksandra Krajewska34, Kangho Lee24, Changfeng Li35, Harri Lipsanen35, Andrea Liscio, Martin R. Lohe14, Annick Loiseau5, Lucia Lombardi3, María Francisca López7, Oliver Martin22, Cristina Martín36, Lidia Martínez7, José A. Martín-Gago7, José I. Martínez7, Nicola Marzari29, Alvaro Mayoral37, Alvaro Mayoral6, John B. McManus2, Manuela Melucci, Javier Méndez7, Cesar Merino, Pablo Merino7, Andreas Meyer22, Elisa Miniussi16, Vaidotas Miseikis11, Neeraj Mishra11, Vittorio Morandi, Carmen Munuera7, Roberto Muñoz7, Hugo Nolan2, Luca Ortolani, A. K. Ott3, A. K. Ott38, Irene Palacio7, Vincenzo Palermo39, John Parthenios27, Iwona Pasternak40, Amalia Patanè8, Maurizio Prato21, Maurizio Prato41, Henri Prevost5, Vladimir Prudkovskiy13, Nicola M. Pugno42, Nicola M. Pugno43, Nicola M. Pugno44, Teófilo Rojo45, Antonio Rossi11, Pascal Ruffieux20, Paolo Samorì18, Léonard Schué5, Eki J. Setijadi10, Thomas Seyller46, Giorgio Speranza10, Christoph Stampfer9, I. Stenger5, Wlodek Strupinski40, Yuri Svirko31, Simone Taioli28, Simone Taioli47, Kenneth B. K. Teo, Matteo Testi10, Flavia Tomarchio3, Mauro Tortello15, Emanuele Treossi, Andrey Turchanin48, Ester Vázquez36, Elvira Villaro, Patrick Rebsdorf Whelan19, Zhenyuan Xia39, Rositza Yakimova, Sheng Yang14, G. Reza Yazdi, Chanyoung Yim24, Duhee Yoon3, Xianghui Zhang17, Xiaodong Zhuang14, Luigi Colombo49, Andrea C. Ferrari3, Mar García-Hernández7 
Heidelberg University1, Trinity College, Dublin2, University of Cambridge3, Autonomous University of Madrid4, Université Paris-Saclay5, University of Zaragoza6, Spanish National Research Council7, University of Nottingham8, RWTH Aachen University9, Kessler Foundation10, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia11, Georgia Institute of Technology12, University of Grenoble13, Dresden University of Technology14, Polytechnic University of Turin15, University of Zurich16, Bielefeld University17, University of Strasbourg18, Technical University of Denmark19, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology20, Ikerbasque21, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg22, Technische Universität München23, Bundeswehr University Munich24, University of Bern25, University of Patras26, Foundation for Research & Technology – Hellas27, Center for Theoretical Studies, University of Miami28, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne29, University of Ulm30, University of Eastern Finland31, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki32, University of Manchester33, Polish Academy of Sciences34, Aalto University35, University of Castilla–La Mancha36, ShanghaiTech University37, University of Exeter38, Chalmers University of Technology39, Warsaw University of Technology40, University of Trieste41, University of Trento42, Queen Mary University of London43, Instituto Politécnico Nacional44, University of the Basque Country45, Chemnitz University of Technology46, Charles University in Prague47, University of Jena48, University of Texas at Dallas49
29 Jan 2020
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present an overview of the main techniques for production and processing of graphene and related materials (GRMs), as well as the key characterization procedures, adopting a 'hands-on' approach, providing practical details and procedures as derived from literature and from the authors' experience, in order to enable the reader to reproduce the results.
Abstract: © 2020 The Author(s). We present an overview of the main techniques for production and processing of graphene and related materials (GRMs), as well as the key characterization procedures. We adopt a 'hands-on' approach, providing practical details and procedures as derived from literature as well as from the authors' experience, in order to enable the reader to reproduce the results. Section I is devoted to 'bottom up' approaches, whereby individual constituents are pieced together into more complex structures. We consider graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) produced either by solution processing or by on-surface synthesis in ultra high vacuum (UHV), as well carbon nanomembranes (CNM). Production of a variety of GNRs with tailored band gaps and edge shapes is now possible. CNMs can be tuned in terms of porosity, crystallinity and electronic behaviour. Section II covers 'top down' techniques. These rely on breaking down of a layered precursor, in the graphene case usually natural crystals like graphite or artificially synthesized materials, such as highly oriented pyrolythic graphite, monolayers or few layers (FL) flakes. The main focus of this section is on various exfoliation techniques in a liquid media, either intercalation or liquid phase exfoliation (LPE). The choice of precursor, exfoliation method, medium as well as the control of parameters such as time or temperature are crucial. A definite choice of parameters and conditions yields a particular material with specific properties that makes it more suitable for a targeted application. We cover protocols for the graphitic precursors to graphene oxide (GO). This is an important material for a range of applications in biomedicine, energy storage, nanocomposites, etc. Hummers' and modified Hummers' methods are used to make GO that subsequently can be reduced to obtain reduced graphene oxide (RGO) with a variety of strategies. GO flakes are also employed to prepare three-dimensional (3d) low density structures, such as sponges, foams, hydro- or aerogels. The assembly of flakes into 3d structures can provide improved mechanical properties. Aerogels with a highly open structure, with interconnected hierarchical pores, can enhance the accessibility to the whole surface area, as relevant for a number of applications, such as energy storage. The main recipes to yield graphite intercalation compounds (GICs) are also discussed. GICs are suitable precursors for covalent functionalization of graphene, but can also be used for the synthesis of uncharged graphene in solution. Degradation of the molecules intercalated in GICs can be triggered by high temperature treatment or microwave irradiation, creating a gas pressure surge in graphite and exfoliation. Electrochemical exfoliation by applying a voltage in an electrolyte to a graphite electrode can be tuned by varying precursors, electrolytes and potential. Graphite electrodes can be either negatively or positively intercalated to obtain GICs that are subsequently exfoliated. We also discuss the materials that can be amenable to exfoliation, by employing a theoretical data-mining approach. The exfoliation of LMs usually results in a heterogeneous dispersion of flakes with different lateral size and thickness. This is a critical bottleneck for applications, and hinders the full exploitation of GRMs produced by solution processing. The establishment of procedures to control the morphological properties of exfoliated GRMs, which also need to be industrially scalable, is one of the key needs. Section III deals with the processing of flakes. (Ultra)centrifugation techniques have thus far been the most investigated to sort GRMs following ultrasonication, shear mixing, ball milling, microfluidization, and wet-jet milling. It allows sorting by size and thickness. Inks formulated from GRM dispersions can be printed using a number of processes, from inkjet to screen printing. Each technique has specific rheological requirements, as well as geometrical constraints. The solvent choice is critical, not only for the GRM stability, but also in terms of optimizing printing on different substrates, such as glass, Si, plastic, paper, etc, all with different surface energies. Chemical modifications of such substrates is also a key step. Sections IV-VII are devoted to the growth of GRMs on various substrates and their processing after growth to place them on the surface of choice for specific applications. The substrate for graphene growth is a key determinant of the nature and quality of the resultant film. The lattice mismatch between graphene and substrate influences the resulting crystallinity. Growth on insulators, such as SiO2, typically results in films with small crystallites, whereas growth on the close-packed surfaces of metals yields highly crystalline films. Section IV outlines the growth of graphene on SiC substrates. This satisfies the requirements for electronic applications, with well-defined graphene-substrate interface, low trapped impurities and no need for transfer. It also allows graphene structures and devices to be measured directly on the growth substrate. The flatness of the substrate results in graphene with minimal strain and ripples on large areas, allowing spectroscopies and surface science to be performed. We also discuss the surface engineering by intercalation of the resulting graphene, its integration with Si-wafers and the production of nanostructures with the desired shape, with no need for patterning. Section V deals with chemical vapour deposition (CVD) onto various transition metals and on insulators. Growth on Ni results in graphitized polycrystalline films. While the thickness of these films can be optimized by controlling the deposition parameters, such as the type of hydrocarbon precursor and temperature, it is difficult to attain single layer graphene (SLG) across large areas, owing to the simultaneous nucleation/growth and solution/precipitation mechanisms. The differing characteristics of polycrystalline Ni films facilitate the growth of graphitic layers at different rates, resulting in regions with differing numbers of graphitic layers. High-quality films can be grown on Cu. Cu is available in a variety of shapes and forms, such as foils, bulks, foams, thin films on other materials and powders, making it attractive for industrial production of large area graphene films. The push to use CVD graphene in applications has also triggered a research line for the direct growth on insulators. The quality of the resulting films is lower than possible to date on metals, but enough, in terms of transmittance and resistivity, for many applications as described in section V. Transfer technologies are the focus of section VI. CVD synthesis of graphene on metals and bottom up molecular approaches require SLG to be transferred to the final target substrates. To have technological impact, the advances in production of high-quality large-area CVD graphene must be commensurate with those on transfer and placement on the final substrates. This is a prerequisite for most applications, such as touch panels, anticorrosion coatings, transparent electrodes and gas sensors etc. New strategies have improved the transferred graphene quality, making CVD graphene a feasible option for CMOS foundries. Methods based on complete etching of the metal substrate in suitable etchants, typically iron chloride, ammonium persulfate, or hydrogen chloride although reliable, are time- and resourceconsuming, with damage to graphene and production of metal and etchant residues. Electrochemical delamination in a low-concentration aqueous solution is an alternative. In this case metallic substrates can be reused. Dry transfer is less detrimental for the SLG quality, enabling a deterministic transfer. There is a large range of layered materials (LMs) beyond graphite. Only few of them have been already exfoliated and fully characterized. Section VII deals with the growth of some of these materials. Amongst them, h-BN, transition metal tri- and di-chalcogenides are of paramount importance. The growth of h-BN is at present considered essential for the development of graphene in (opto) electronic applications, as h-BN is ideal as capping layer or substrate. The interesting optical and electronic properties of TMDs also require the development of scalable methods for their production. Large scale growth using chemical/physical vapour deposition or thermal assisted conversion has been thus far limited to a small set, such as h-BN or some TMDs. Heterostructures could also be directly grown.

330 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A method that may facilitate the description of the bonding of gas molecules to transitionmetal oxides, sulfides, and nitrides is introduced, and it is found that there are a set of scaling relationhips between the adsorption energies of different partially hydrogenated intermediates on transition-metal surfaces.
Abstract: There has been substantial progress in the description of adsorption and chemical reactions of simple molecules on transition-metal surfaces. Adsorption energies and activation energies have been obtained for a number of systems, and complete catalytic reactions have been described in some detail. Considerable progress has also been made in the theoretical description of the interaction of molecules with transition-metal oxides, sulfides, and nitrides, but it is considerably more complicated to describe such complex systems theoretically. Complications arise from difficulties in describing the stoichiometry and structure of such surfaces, and from possible shortcomings in the use of ordinary generalized gradient approximation (GGA) type density functional theory (DFT). Herein we introduce a method that may facilitate the description of the bonding of gas molecules to transitionmetal oxides, sulfides, and nitrides. It was recently found that there are a set of scaling relationhips between the adsorption energies of different partially hydrogenated intermediates on transition-metal surfaces. We will show that similar scaling relationships exist for adsorption on transition metal oxide, sulfide, and nitride surfaces. This means that knowing the adsorption energy for one transition-metal complex will make it possible to quite easily generate data for a number of other complexes, and in this way obtain reactivity trends. The results presented herein have been calculated using self-consistent DFT. Exchange and correlation effects are described using the revised Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (RPBE) GGA functional. It is known that GGA functionals give adsorption energies with reasonable accuracy for transition metals. It is not clear, however, whether a similar accuracy can be expected for the oxides, sulfides, and nitrides, although there are examples of excellent agreement betweenDFT calculations and experiments, for example, with RuO2 surfaces. [9] In our study we focused entirely on variations in the adsorption energies from one system to another, and we expected that such results would be less dependent than the absolute adsorption energies on the description of exchange and correlation. For the nitrides, a clean surface and a surface with a nitrogen vacancy were studied. For MX2-type oxides or sulfides, an oxygenor sulfur-covered surface with an oxygen or sulfur vacancy was studied. The structures of the clean surface considered in the present work and their unit cells are shown in Figure 1. The adsorption energies given below are for the adsorbed species in the most stable adsorption site on the surface. By performing calculations for a large number of transition-metal surfaces of different orientations, it was found that the adsorption energy of intermediates of the type AHx is linearly correlated with the adsorption energy of atom A (N, O, S) according to Equation (1):

305 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
10 Mar 1970

8,159 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
13 Jan 2017-Science
TL;DR: A unified theoretical framework highlights the need for catalyst design strategies that selectively stabilize distinct reaction intermediates relative to each other, and opens up opportunities and approaches to develop higher-performance electrocatalysts for a wide range of reactions.
Abstract: BACKGROUND With a rising global population, increasing energy demands, and impending climate change, major concerns have been raised over the security of our energy future. Developing sustainable, fossil-free pathways to produce fuels and chemicals of global importance could play a major role in reducing carbon dioxide emissions while providing the feedstocks needed to make the products we use on a daily basis. One prospective goal is to develop electrochemical conversion processes that can convert molecules in the atmosphere (e.g., water, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen) into higher-value products (e.g., hydrogen, hydrocarbons, oxygenates, and ammonia) by coupling to renewable energy. Electrocatalysts play a key role in these energy conversion technologies because they increase the rate, efficiency, and selectivity of the chemical transformations involved. Today’s electrocatalysts, however, are inadequate. The grand challenge is to develop advanced electrocatalysts with the enhanced performance needed to enable widespread penetration of clean energy technologies. ADVANCES Over the past decade, substantial progress has been made in understanding several key electrochemical transformations, particularly those that involve water, hydrogen, and oxygen. The combination of theoretical and experimental studies working in concert has proven to be a successful strategy in this respect, yielding a framework to understand catalytic trends that can ultimately provide rational guidance toward the development of improved catalysts. Catalyst design strategies that aim to increase the number of active sites and/or increase the intrinsic activity of each active site have been successfully developed. The field of hydrogen evolution, for example, has seen important breakthroughs over the years in the development of highly active non–precious metal catalysts in acid. Notable advancements have also been made in the design of oxygen reduction and evolution catalysts, although there remains substantial room for improvement. The combination of theory and experiment elucidates the remaining challenges in developing further improved catalysts, often involving scaling relations among reactive intermediates. This understanding serves as an initial platform to design strategies to circumvent technical obstacles, opening up opportunities and approaches to develop higher-performance electrocatalysts for a wide range of reactions. OUTLOOK A systematic framework of combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis helps to uncover broader governing principles that can be used to understand a wide variety of electrochemical transformations. These principles can be applied to other emerging and promising clean energy reactions, including hydrogen peroxide production, carbon dioxide reduction, and nitrogen reduction, among others. Although current paradigms for catalyst development have been helpful to date, a number of challenges need to be successfully addressed in order to achieve major breakthroughs. One important frontier, for example, is the development of both experimental and computational methods that can rapidly elucidate reaction mechanisms on broad classes of materials and in a wide range of operating conditions (e.g., pH, solvent, electrolyte). Such efforts would build on current frameworks for understanding catalysis to provide the deeper insights needed to fine-tune catalyst properties in an optimal manner. The long-term goal is to continue improving the activity and selectivity of these catalysts in order to realize the prospects of using renewable energy to provide the fuels and chemicals that we need for a sustainable energy future.

7,062 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This review acquaints some materials for performing OER activity, in which the metal oxide materials build the basis of OER mechanism while non-oxide materials exhibit greatly promising performance toward overall water-splitting.
Abstract: There is still an ongoing effort to search for sustainable, clean and highly efficient energy generation to satisfy the energy needs of modern society. Among various advanced technologies, electrocatalysis for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) plays a key role and numerous new electrocatalysts have been developed to improve the efficiency of gas evolution. Along the way, enormous effort has been devoted to finding high-performance electrocatalysts, which has also stimulated the invention of new techniques to investigate the properties of materials or the fundamental mechanism of the OER. This accumulated knowledge not only establishes the foundation of the mechanism of the OER, but also points out the important criteria for a good electrocatalyst based on a variety of studies. Even though it may be difficult to include all cases, the aim of this review is to inspect the current progress and offer a comprehensive insight toward the OER. This review begins with examining the theoretical principles of electrode kinetics and some measurement criteria for achieving a fair evaluation among the catalysts. The second part of this review acquaints some materials for performing OER activity, in which the metal oxide materials build the basis of OER mechanism while non-oxide materials exhibit greatly promising performance toward overall water-splitting. Attention of this review is also paid to in situ approaches to electrocatalytic behavior during OER, and this information is crucial and can provide efficient strategies to design perfect electrocatalysts for OER. Finally, the OER mechanism from the perspective of both recent experimental and theoretical investigations is discussed, as well as probable strategies for improving OER performance with regards to future developments.

3,976 citations