Showing papers by "Joseph L. Izzo published in 2012"

Olmesartan for the Delay or Prevention of Microalbuminuria in Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract: A b s t r ac t Background Microalbuminuria is an early predictor of diabetic nephropathy and premature cardiovascular disease. We investigated whether treatment with an angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) would delay or prevent the occurrence of microalbuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes and normoalbuminuria. Methods In a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, controlled trial, we assigned 4447 patients with type 2 diabetes to receive olmesartan (at a dose of 40 mg once daily) or placebo for a median of 3.2 years. Additional antihypertensive drugs (except angiotensin-converting–enzyme inhibitors or ARBs) were used as needed to lower blood pressure to less than 130/80 mm Hg. The primary outcome was the time to the first onset of microalbuminuria. The times to the onset of renal and cardiovascular events were analyzed as secondary end points. Results The target blood pressure (<130/80 mm Hg) was achieved in nearly 80% of the patients taking olmesartan and 71% taking placebo; blood pressure measured in the clinic was lower by 3.1/1.9 mm Hg in the olmesartan group than in the placebo group. Microalbuminuria developed in 8.2% of the patients in the olmesartan group (178 of 2160 patients who could be evaluated) and 9.8% in the placebo group (210 of 2139); the time to the onset of microalbuminuria was increased by 23% with olmesartan (hazard ratio for onset of microalbuminuria, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.63 to 0.94; P = 0.01). The serum creatinine level doubled in 1% of the patients in each group. Slightly fewer patients in the olmesartan group than in the placebo group had nonfatal cardiovascular events — 81 of 2232 patients (3.6%) as compared with 91 of 2215 patients (4.1%) (P = 0.37) — but a greater number had fatal cardiovascular events — 15 patients (0.7%) as compared with 3 patients (0.1%) (P = 0.01), a difference that was attributable in part to a higher rate of death from cardiovascular causes in the olmesartan group than in the placebo group among patients with preexisting coronary heart disease (11 of 564 patients [2.0%] vs. 1 of 540 [0.2%], P = 0.02). Conclusions Olmesartan was associated with a delayed onset of microalbuminuria, even though blood-pressure control in both groups was excellent according to current standards. The higher rate of fatal cardiovascular events with olmesartan among patients with preexisting coronary heart disease is of concern. (Funded by Daiichi Sankyo; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00185159.)

Prevention of microalbuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension.

Abstract: BACKGROUND We have previously demonstrated in the Randomized Olmesartan and Diabetes Microalbuminuria Prevention study that the angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) olmesartan delays the onset of microalbuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes. Now, we investigated the effect in the subpopulation with hypertension. METHODS Overall, 4020 patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension at baseline (defined by a SBP/DBP ≥130/80 mmHg or use of antihypertensive medication) received either 40 mg olmesartan once daily or placebo for a median of 3.2 years in a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, controlled trial. Additional antihypertensive drugs (except angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or ARBs) were used as needed to lower blood pressure (BP) to less than 130/80 mmHg. RESULTS The average BP was 126.3/74.7 and 129.5/76.6 mmHg, respectively (P < 0.001). Olmesartan delayed the time to onset of microalbuminuria by 25% (hazard ratio = 0.75; 95% confidence interval = 0.61-0.92, P = 0.007). Patients with a baseline SBP above the median of 136.7 mmHg and a SBP reduction above the median of 17.45 mmHg had a lower incidence of microalbuminuria than patients with a SBP reduction of less than 17.45 (8.1 vs. 11.2%, P < 0.0001). Independent from the baseline BP and the degree of BP reduction a 15-39% increase in the time to onset of microalbuminuria was detectable by olmesartan treatment. Cardiovascular events were comparable and occurred in 93 (4.6%) patients taking olmesartan and 86 (4.4%) taking placebo. CONCLUSION Patients with a better BP reduction are less likely to develop microalbuminuria. Treatment with olmesartan delayed the onset of microalbuminuria independent of the baseline BP and the degree of BP reduction.

Efficacy and safety of triple-combination therapy with olmesartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide in study participants with hypertension and diabetes: a subpopulation analysis of the TRINITY study

Abstract: Background Most patients with hypertension and diabetes require two or more antihypertensive agents to achieve the recommended blood pressure (BP) goal of TRI ple Therapy with Olmesartan Medoxomil, Amlodipine, and Hydrochlorothiazide in HyperteNsIve PatienTs StudY assessed the efficacy and safety of triple-combination treatment (olmesartan medoxomil 40/amlodipine besylate 10/hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg) versus the component dual-combination treatments according to diabetes status (diabetes; non-diabetes). Methods Participants received dual-combination treatment for 4 weeks or placebo for 2 weeks. Participants receiving placebo switched to dual-combination treatment from week 2 to week 4. At week 4, participants switched to triple-combination treatment or continued on dual-combination treatment until week 12. Results The prespecified changes in BP from baseline for the diabetes subgroup receiving triple-combination treatment were greater than the respective dual-combination treatments ( P ≤ .0013). Also, more participants with diabetes receiving triple-combination treatment reached BP goal ( P ≤ .0092). In a post hoc analysis, significantly greater proportions of study participants with diabetes achieved BP targets with triple-combination treatment compared with each dual-combination treatment. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. Conclusions In participants with hypertension and diabetes, triple-combination treatment led to greater BP reductions and enabled greater proportions of participants to reach BP goal versus the dual-combination treatments. Triple-combination treatment was well tolerated in both diabetes and non-diabetes subgroups.

Olmesartan/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide in participants with hypertension and diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or chronic cardiovascular disease: a subanalysis of the multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group TRINITY study

Abstract: Patients with hypertension and cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes, or chronic kidney disease (CKD) usually require two or more antihypertensive agents to achieve blood pressure (BP) goals. The efficacy/safety of olmesartan (OM) 40 mg, amlodipine besylate (AML) 10 mg, and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg versus the component dual-combinations (OM 40/AML 10 mg, OM 40/HCTZ 25 mg, and AML 10/HCTZ 25 mg) was evaluated in participants with diabetes, CKD, or chronic CVD in the Triple Therapy with Olmesartan Medoxomil, Amlodipine, and Hydrochlorothiazide in Hypertensive Patients Study (TRINITY). The primary efficacy end point was least squares (LS) mean reduction from baseline in seated diastolic BP (SeDBP) at week 12. Secondary end points included LS mean reduction in SeSBP and proportion of participants achieving BP goal (<130/80 mm Hg) at week 12 (double-blind randomized period), and LS mean reduction in SeBP and BP goal achievement at week 52/early termination (open-label period). At week 12, OM 40/AML 10/HCTZ 25 mg resulted in significantly greater SeBP reductions in participants with diabetes (−37.9/22.0 mm Hg vs −28.0/17.6 mm Hg for OM 40/AML 10 mg, −26.4/14.7 mm Hg for OM 40/HCTZ 25 mg, and −27.6/14.8 mm Hg for AML 10/HCTZ 25 mg), CKD (−44.3/25.5 mm Hg vs −39.5/23.8 mm Hg for OM 40/AML 10 mg, −25.3/17.0 mm Hg for OM 40/HCTZ 25 mg, and −33.4/20.6 mm Hg for AML 10/HCTZ 25 mg), and chronic CVD (−37.8/20.6 mm Hg vs −31.7/18.2 mm Hg for OM 40/AML 10 mg, −30.9/17.1 mm Hg for OM 40/HCTZ 25 mg, and −27.5/16.1 mm Hg for AML 10/HCTZ 25 mg) (P<0.05 for all subgroups vs dual-component treatments). BP goal achievement was greater for participants receiving triple-combination treatment compared with the dual-combination treatments, and was achieved in 41.1%, 55.0%, and 38.9% of participants with diabetes, CKD, and chronic CVD on OM 40/AML 10/HCTZ 25 mg, respectively. At week 52, there was sustained BP lowering with the OM/AML/HCTZ regimen. Overall, the triple combination was well tolerated. In patients with diabetes, CKD, or chronic CVD, short-term (12 weeks) and long-term treatment with OM 40/AML 10/HCTZ 25 mg was well tolerated, lowered BP more effectively, and enabled more participants to reach BP goal than the corresponding 2-component regimens. NCT00649389

Long-term efficacy and safety of triple-combination therapy with olmesartan medoxomil and amlodipine besylate and hydrochlorothiazide for hypertension.

Abstract: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012;14:149-157. ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Most patients with hypertension require combination therapy in order to achieve blood pressure (BP) goals. This 40-week open-label extension of the 12-week double-blind Triple Therapy With Olmesartan Medoxomil, Amlodipine, and Hydrochlorothiazide in Hypertensive Patients Study (TRINITY) evaluated the efficacy and safety of triple-combination treatments with olmesartan medoxomil, amlodipine besylate, and hydrochlorothiazide (OM/AML/HCTZ) in 2112 participants with moderate to severe hypertension. Following 2 weeks of initial treatment with OM 40/AML 5/HCTZ 12.5 mg, participants not achieving BP goal were titrated to OM 40/AML 5/HCTZ 25 mg or OM 40/AML 10/HCTZ 12.5 mg on a randomized basis. At week 16, participants who did not achieve BP goal were further titrated to OM 40/AML 10/HCTZ 25 mg. At the end of the study, 44.5% to 79.8% of participants reached BP goal and the mean BP decreased from 168.6/100.7 mm Hg (baseline BP at randomization) to 125.0 to 136.8 mm Hg/77.8 to 82.5 mm Hg, depending on treatment. Long-term treatment with OM/AML/HCTZ was well tolerated and effective with no new safety concerns.

Triple-Combination Therapy with Olmesartan, Amlodipine, and Hydrochlorothiazide in Black and Non-Black Study Participants with Hypertension

Abstract: Background Although awareness of hypertension in Black patients has increased, blood pressure (BP) is frequently inadequately controlled. Objective This prespecified subgroup analysis of the TRINITY study evaluated the efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, amlodipine besylate (AML) 10 mg, and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg triple-combination treatment compared with the component dual-combination treatments in Black and non-Black study participants. Study Design TRINITY was a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group evaluation. The first patient was enrolled in May 2008 and the last patient completed the study in February 2009. The study consisted of a 3-week washout period for participants receiving antihypertensive therapy and a 12-week double-blind treatment period. For the treatment phase, all study participants were stratified by age, race, and diabetes mellitus status and randomized to a treatment sequence that led to their final treatment assignment, which they received from weeks 4 to 12 (OM 40 mg/AML 10 mg/HCTZ 25 mg, OM 40 mg/AML 10 mg, OM 40 mg/HCTZ 25 mg, or AML 10 mg/HCTZ 25 mg). In the first 2 weeks of the double-blind treatment period, all participants received either dual-combination treatment or placebo. Participants assigned to dual-combination treatment continued treatment until week 4, and participants receiving placebo were switched at week 2 to receive one of the dual-combination treatments until week 4. At week 4, participants either continued dual-combination treatment or randomly received triple-combination treatment until week 12. Setting 317 clinical sites in the USA and Puerto Rico were included in the study. Patients Study participants eligible for randomization (N = 2492) were ≥18 years of age with mean seated blood pressure (SeBP) ≥140/100 mmHg or ≥160/90 mmHg (off antihypertensive medication). Intervention The intervention was with dual- or triple-combination antihypertensive treatment: OM 40 mg/AML 10 mg/HCTZ 25 mg, OM 40 mg/AML 10 mg, OM 40 mg/HCTZ 25 mg, or AML 10 mg/HCTZ 25 mg. Main Outcome Measure The primary efficacy variable was the change in least squares (LS) mean seated diastolic BP (SeDBP) from baseline to week 12. Secondary efficacy variables included the LS mean change in seated systolic BP (SeSBP), percentage of study participants reaching BP goal, and safety parameters. >Results In both Black and non-Black participants, triple-combination treatment resulted in significant and similar mean reductions in SeDBP and SeSBP (p≤0.0001 vs each dual-combination treatment) with a greater proportion of participants reaching BP goal compared with dual-combination treatments, regardless of race. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate in severity and no new safety concerns were identified. Conclusion Triple-combination treatment provided greater BP reductions than dual-combination treatments regardless of race. Clinical Trial Registration Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00649389.

Triple-Combination therapy with olmesartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide in black and non-black study participants with hypertension: the TRINITY randomized, double-blind, 12-week, parallel-group study.

Abstract: Background Although awareness of hypertension in Black patients has increased, blood pressure (BP) is frequently inadequately controlled. Objective This prespecified subgroup analysis of the TRINITY study evaluated the efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil (OM) 40 mg, amlodipine besylate (AML) 10 mg, and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg triple-combination treatment compared with the component dual-combination treatments in Black and non-Black study participants. Study design TRINITY was a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group evaluation. The first patient was enrolled in May 2008 and the last patient completed the study in February 2009. The study consisted of a 3-week washout period for participants receiving antihypertensive therapy and a 12-week double-blind treatment period. For the treatment phase, all study participants were stratified by age, race, and diabetes mellitus status and randomized to a treatment sequence that led to their final treatment assignment, which they received from weeks 4 to 12 (OM 40 mg/AML 10 mg/HCTZ 25 mg, OM 40 mg/AML 10 mg, OM 40 mg/HCTZ 25 mg, or AML 10 mg/HCTZ 25 mg). In the first 2 weeks of the double-blind treatment period, all participants received either dual-combination treatment or placebo. Participants assigned to dual-combination treatment continued treatment until week 4, and participants receiving placebo were switched at week 2 to receive one of the dual-combination treatments until week 4. At week 4, participants either continued dual-combination treatment or randomly received triple-combination treatment until week 12. Setting 317 clinical sites in the USA and Puerto Rico were included in the study. Patients Study participants eligible for randomization (N = 2492) were ≥18 years of age with mean seated blood pressure (SeBP) ≥140/100 mmHg or ≥160/90 mmHg (off antihypertensive medication). Intervention The intervention was with dual- or triple-combination antihypertensive treatment: OM 40 mg/AML 10 mg/HCTZ 25 mg, OM 40 mg/AML 10 mg, OM 40 mg/HCTZ 25 mg, or AML 10 mg/HCTZ 25 mg. Main outcome measure The primary efficacy variable was the change in least squares (LS) mean seated diastolic BP (SeDBP) from baseline to week 12. Secondary efficacy variables included the LS mean change in seated systolic BP (SeSBP), percentage of study participants reaching BP goal, and safety parameters. Results In both Black and non-Black participants, triple-combination treatment resulted in significant and similar mean reductions in SeDBP and SeSBP (p ≤ 0.0001 vs each dual-combination treatment) with a greater proportion of participants reaching BP goal compared with dual-combination treatments, regardless of race. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate in severity and no new safety concerns were identified. Conclusion Triple-combination treatment provided greater BP reductions than dual-combination treatments regardless of race. Clinical trial registration Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00649389.

Hemodynamic and central blood pressure differences between carvedilol and valsartan added to lisinopril at rest and during exercise stress.

Abstract: There is little information about the hemodynamic and exercise-response implications of renin-angiotensin system blocker combinations. After a 3-week lisinopril (L; 40 mg/day) run-in, carvedilol (C; 20 then 40 mg/day) or valsartan (V; 160 then 320 mg/day) was added to L for 4 weeks each in a forced-titration, random order-entry crossover study in 30 subjects. Arterial tonometry (central pressures and time-tension index, TTI); impedance cardiography (steady-state hemodynamics), and ultrasound (carotid flow) were performed at rest and during supine bicycle exercise at 30 and 60 watts. At rest, both V and C lowered TTI similarly (7% to 9%, P = .05 compared with L, in part because they lowered blood pressure (3 to 7/3 to 4 mm Hg). V lowered central systolic pressure, augmentation pressure (AP), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR, all P < .02); C lowered heart rate but not central systolic pressure or SVR. During exercise, V persistently lowered central systolic pressure, AP, and SVR, whereas C did not. Neither drug affected exercise responses or carotid blood flow. Adding V or C to an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor reduced cardiac workload by different mechanisms: vasodilation and reduced central blood pressure with V and lower heart rate with C.

Antihypertensive response to thiazide diuretic or angiotensin receptor blocker in elderly hypertensives is not influenced by pretreatment plasma renin activity.

Abstract: Renin profiling has been proposed as a method to guide antihypertensive drug selection. This prespecified post-hoc analysis examined the influence of baseline plasma renin activity (PRA) on blood pressure (BP) responses. A 16-week, randomized, double-blind, prompted-titration trial evaluated initial valsartan (V)/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combination therapy versus initial HCTZ or V monotherapy in individuals aged ≥70 years with systolic hypertension. Sitting PRA was measured at baseline, Week 4, and Week 16. Subjects were stratified into 2 groups for analysis: low renin (baseline PRA <0.65 ng/mL/h) or normal-high renin (baseline PRA ≥0.65 ng/mL/h). PRA data were available in 322/384 subjects: 178 had low PRA and 144 had normal-high PRA. At Week 4, V/HCTZ was more effective than HCTZ or V at reducing mean sitting systolic BP (MSSBP), independent of baseline PRA, with reductions of −16.9, −12.6, and −9.5 mmHg, respectively, in low-renin subjects and −19.4, −11.5, and −8.6 mmHg in normal-high renin subjects. Baseline PRA was similar in responders (subjects not uptitrated at Week 4) and nonresponders (subjects uptitrated at Week 4). In responders, the reactive rise in PRA at Week 4 was related to change in MSSBP, with the greatest increases in PRA observed in the V/HCTZ group. Higher baseline PRA was associated with a greater reactive rise in PRA. Baseline PRA is not a useful guide to the BP responses of initial combination V/HCTZ in elderly individuals with systolic hypertension.

Differences in mean and variability of heart rate and ambulatory rate-pressure product when valsartan or carvedilol is added to lisinopril.

Abstract: Guidelines recommend combining β-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in high-risk heart disease but not in the initial treatment of hypertension The mechanism of this benefit has not been determined After 3 weeks of lisinopril (L, 40 mg/day) run-in, 30 subjects entered a single-blinded, forced-titration, crossover study in which carvedilol (C, 20 then 40 mg/day) or a control renin-angiotensin blocker, valsartan (V, 160 then 320 mg/day) were added to L Ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and heart rate monitoring was performed at the end of each period Rate-pressure product (RPP, systolic BP × heart rate, an indicator of cardiac oxygen consumption) was measured over 24 hours, daytime (6 am to midnight), and nighttime (midnight to 6 am) periods Variability (standard deviation and range) of RPP, BP, and heart rate was also investigated After 4 weeks, mean 24-hour systolic BP was about 8 mm Hg lower when either V or C was added to L ( P P P = NS) Consequently, C lowered RPP to a greater degree than V over 24 hours (about 8% vs 2%, P P

Home and clinic blood pressure responses in elderly individuals with systolic hypertension.

Abstract: Home blood pressure (BP) monitoring may enhance assessment of BP control. In this 16-week study, men and women 70 years or older with systolic BP between 150 and 200 mm Hg were randomized to receive valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (V/HCTZ) 160/12.5 mg (n = 128), HCTZ 12.5 mg (n = 128), or V 160 mg (n = 128) for 4 weeks. Participants whose BP was 140/90 mm Hg or higher at weeks 4, 8, or 12 were uptitrated to a maximum of V/HCTZ 320/25 mg. Participants were evaluated by home BP monitoring using an automated device weekly before taking daily study medication (n = 301). Baseline BP ± SD for clinic (165.5 ± 11.8/85.1 ± 9.5 mm Hg) was approximately 3/1 mm Hg greater than home readings (162.5 ± 15.8/84.3 ± 10.2 mm Hg). Reductions in BP ± SEM at week 4 were similar for clinic (12.6 ± 1.0/4.7 ± 0.5 mm Hg) and home (10.9 ± 1.1/3.8 ± 0.5 mm Hg) readings (P = .25/P = .23; clinic versus home); differences between V/HCTZ and HCTZ or V were also similar for both home and clinic readings and results by either technique correlated significantly (P < .0001). Home BP measurements confirm that treatment initiated with V/HCTZ versus monotherapy resulted in greater antihypertensive efficacy. Home BP monitoring, if done with proper technique, provides a reliable indicator of BP control in elderly patients and may help guide drug dosing and titration.

Value of combined thiazide-loop diuretic therapy in chronic kidney disease: heart failure and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone blockade.

Abstract: Dussol and coworkers have provided clinically important information to refute the myth that thiazides are ineffective and should not be used in patients who are beyond stage 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD). The authors studied the relative effects of hydrochlorothiazide and long-acting furosemide in individuals with stage 4 or 5 CKD and found that, while both drugs reduced blood pressure and enhanced natriuresis, the combination was superior to either component in both categories. These salutary effects occurred despite reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and filtration fraction. In addition, they found a favorable effect on potassium balance in these patients with CKD: serum potassium was reduced from 4.9 mEq ⁄ L at baseline to 4.1 mEq ⁄ L during combination diuretic therapy. Ultimately, the authors have probably understated the value of combined diuretic therapy in CKD and heart failure (HF), where anti–renin-angiotensinaldosterone system (RAAS) drugs are almost always necessary. The value of enhanced natriuresis is easily understood, but the value of improved potassium balance is equally important. In today’s world, a modest elevation in serum potassium often engenders panic and discontinuation of RAAS blockade whether appropriate or not. In parallel, the misdiagnosis of ‘‘acute kidney injury’’ based on a trivial change in creatinine or GFR also dooms too many patients to inappropriate discontinuation of RAAS blockers. In our institution, the number of HF readmissions has increased as a result of this misguided practice. For decades, I have successfully used combination RAAS blockade plus combined thiazide ⁄ loop diuretics in CKD and HF patients, including diabetic individuals with type IV renal tubular acidosis. Diuretic combinations simultaneously help control blood pressure, volume, and potassium and have allowed me to maintain adequate doses of lifesaving RAAS-blocker drugs, including triple combinations (b-blocker, angiotensinconverting enzyme inhibitor, and spironolactone). In my experience, potassium balance during RAAS inhibition can be further enhanced by not requiring universal dietary sodium restriction, at least in individuals without signs of fluid overload; this practice provides additional distal tubular sodium for exchange with potassium and hydrogen. I have seen only two cases of hyperkalemia with combined RAAS blockade, both in diabetics who were no longer responsive to oral antidiabetic drugs; neither had hyperkalemia after institution of insulin therapy. Diuretic combinations are usually well tolerated, although some individuals with hypotension, fatigue, or hyponatremia have required reduced diuretic dosages. Combined diuretic therapy has not been a factor in CKD progression, but dose adjustment or a pause in therapy may be needed if GFR decreases acutely.

Blood Pressure Variability

Abstract: Publisher Summary This chapter explains blood pressure variability and physiologic control of sympathetic nervous system (SNS) outflow. Control of SNS outflow is generated from complex bidirectional signals among interconnected centers within the central nervous system and peripheral tissues. Given the wide range of responses observed in normal human physiology, it is difficult to identify discrete boundaries of abnormal BP variation. From a clinical perspective, such variation can confound the diagnosis and management of hypertension and may contribute directly to cardiovascular disease (CVD). During normal respiration, breathing is not usually coupled tightly with systemic BP, in part because variations in stroke volume are buffered by baroreflex adjustments as well as vascular damping mechanisms. Maintenance of adequate cerebral perfusion during upright posture requires an instantaneous integrated response of the heart and vasculature that is mediated by the SNS. Physical exercise requires a series of complex neurophysiologic and hemodynamic responses. Centrally regulated increased SNS outflow increases cardiac output and muscle blood flow; stimulatory metaboreceptors in skeletal muscle sustain the response.

Angiotensin Receptor Blocker to Prevent Microalbuminuria

Abstract: study were excluded. Blood pressure was measured with an automated device at each follow-up visit. The blood pressure value used was the mean of three measurements taken at 3-minute intervals by an automated device. The primary outcome was the elapsed time until the initial onset of microalbuminuria. Urine was tested by validated measurements of morning spot urine samples. Microalbuminuria was described in this trial as a urinary albumin (mg) to creatinine (g) ratio of > 35 in women or > 25 in men. Any new abnormal albumin-to-creatinine ratio was confirmed by another positive result (out of two tests) within 2 weeks of the initial abnormal finding. Patients with confirmed positive findings were assigned to an open-label arm of the study and were treated with olmesartan, 40 mg daily. Secondary endpoints were 1) a

Research Article Home and clinic blood pressure responses in elderly individuals with systolic hypertension

Abstract: Home blood pressure (BP) monitoring may enhance assessment of BP control. In this 16-week study, men and women 70 years or older with systolic BP between 150 and 200 mm Hg were randomized to receive valsartan/hydrochlorothi