Joseph R. Mason

Bio: Joseph R. Mason is an academic researcher from Louisiana State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Loan & Great Depression. The author has an hindex of 22, co-authored 65 publications receiving 3741 citations. Previous affiliations of Joseph R. Mason include Drexel University & University of Pennsylvania.

Herding behavior in Chinese stock markets: An examination of A and B shares

Abstract: This study examines herding behavior in dual-listed Chinese A-share and B-share stocks. We find evidence of herding within both the Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share markets that are dominated by domestic individual investors, and also within both B-share markets, in which foreign institutional investors are the main participants. Herding occurs in both rising and falling market conditions. Herding behavior by A-share investors in the Shanghai market is more pronounced under conditions of rising markets, high trading volume, and high volatility, while no asymmetry is apparent in the B-share market.

Contagion and Bank Failures During the Great Depression: The June 1932 Chicago Banking Panic

Abstract: Studies of pre-Depression banking argue that banking panics resulted from depositor confusion about the incidence of shocks, and that interbank cooperation avoided unwarranted failures. This paper uses individual bank data to address the question of whether solvent Chicago banks failed during the panic asthe result of confusion by depositors. Chicago banks are divided" into three groups: panic failures, failures outside the panic window, and survivors. The characteristics of these three groups are compared to determine whether the banks that failed during the panic were similar ex ante" to those that survived the panic or whether they shared characteristics with other banks that failed. Each category of comparison -- the market-to-book value of equity, the estimated probability or failure or duration of survival the composition of debt, the rates of withdrawal of debt during 1931, and the interest rates paid on debt -- leads to the same conclusion: banks that failed during the panic were similar to others that failed and different from survivors. The special attributes of failing banks were distinguishable at least six months before the panic and were reflected in stock prices, failure probabilities, debt composition, and interest rates at least that far in advance. We conclude that failures during the panic reflected relative weakness in the face of common asset value shock rather than contagion. Other evidence points to cooperation among solvent Chicago banks a key factor in avoiding unwarranted bank failures during the panic.

Consequences of Bank Distress During the Great Depression

Abstract: The consequences of bank distress for the economy during the Depression remain an area of unresolved controversy. Since John M. Keynes (1931) and Irving Fisher (1933), macroeconomists have argued that bank distress magnified the extent of the economic decline during the Depression. As the intermediaries controlling money and credit, banks were in a special position to transmit their distress to other sectors. But the mechanism through which banking distress mattered for the economy has been hotly contested. Milton Friedman and Anna J. Schwartz (1963) saw the contraction in the money multiplier—driven, in their view, by panicked depositors’ withdrawals of deposits—as the primary mechanism through which banking distress affected the real economy. They described the mechanism transmitting banking distress to the real sector as operating at the national level through changes in the aggregate supply of money and interest rates. Bank distress reduced the money supply available to the public either through the closure of banks and the consequent freezing of bank deposits, or the withdrawals of deposits by depositors that feared bank failure. Ben S. Bernanke (1983), building on Fisher (1933), emphasized the transmission of monetary shocks via their effects on the balance sheets of borrowers and on the supply of credit by banks. Borrowers’ balance sheets were worsened by debt deflation as the result of fixed dollar debt obligations—borrowers’ net worth and cash flow declined with the rising value of debt service costs relative to income. Borrowers with positive net present value projects, but weak balance sheets, had less internally generated retained earnings to invest and could not qualify for credit. Furthermore, Bernanke argued that the contraction of the money supply produced contraction of nominal income and prices relative to fixed debt service, which weakened borrowers’ balance sheets, and in turn, weakened banks. Not only did firms’ financial distress reduce the number of qualified borrowers, the contraction in banks’ net worth forced a reduction in the supply of bank loans to qualified borrowers. Many firms and individuals relied on banks for credit, and as those banks suffered losses of capital (due to asset value declines) and contractions in deposits (as depositors reacted to bank weakness by withdrawing their funds), even borrowers with viable projects and strong balance sheets experienced a decrease in the effective supply of loanable funds. Bernanke termed the combined weakening of borrowers’ balance sheets and the contraction in bank credit supply a rise in the “cost of credit intermediation.” The scarcity of perfect substitutes for the positive net present value investments of firms with weak balance sheets, and for the credit supplied by existing banks, implies that the weakening of firms’ and banks’ balance sheets, the disappearance of banks, and the contraction in surviving banks’ lending made it more difficult for the economy to channel funds to their best use. Thus, what began as a contraction in aggregate demand became a contraction in aggregate supply, which magnified adverse economic shocks and prolonged and deepened the Depression. The financial distress of firms and banks, and the decline in bank lending, were not only symptoms of the Depression, but means for magnifying the shocks that caused the Depression. Bernanke’s statistical evidence in support of this story is derived from time-series analysis at the national level, in * Calomiris: Graduate School of Business, 601 Uris Hall, Columbia University, 3022 Broadway, New York, NY 10027, and National Bureau of Economic Research (e-mail: cc374@columbia.edu); Mason: Department of Finance, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (e-mail: joe.mason@drexel.edu). We thank Valerie Ramey, David Wheelock, Charles Himmelberg, Steve Zeldes, Gary Gorton, two referees, and seminar participants at Columbia University, Wharton, Northwestern University and the 2001 Economic History Association Meetings for helpful comments on an earlier draft. We gratefully acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation, the University of Illinois, and the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

Fundamentals, Panics and Bank Distress During the Depression

Abstract: This paper provides the first comprehensive econometric analysis of the causes of bank distress during the Depression. We assemble bank-level data for Fed member banks, and combine those data with county-level, state-level, and national-level economic characteristics to capture cross-sectional and inter-temporal variation in the fundamental determinants of bank failure. We find that fundamentals explain most of the incidence of bank failure, and argue that "contagion" or "liquidity crises" were a relatively unimportant influence on bank failure risk prior to 1933. At the national level, we find that the first two banking crises identified by Friedman and Schwartz in 1930 and 1931 are not associated with positive unexplained residual failure risk, or with changes in the importance of liquidity measures for forecasting bank failures. The third banking crisis they identify is a more ambiguous case, but even if one views it as a bona fide liquidity crisis, the size of the contagion effect could not have been very large. The last banking crisis they identify - at the beginning of 1933 - is associated with important, unexplained increases in bank failure risk. We also investigate the potential role of regional or local contagion and illiquidity for promoting bank failure and find some evidence in support of such effects, but these are of small importance in the aggregate.

Contagion and Bank Failures During the Great Depression: The June 1932 Chicago Banking Panic

Abstract: The authors examine the social costs of asymmetric-information-induced bank panics in an environment without government deposit insurance. Their case study is the Chicago bank panic of June 1932. The authors compare the ex ante characteristics of panic failures and panic survivors. Despite temporary confusion about bank asset quality on the part of depositors during the panic, which was associated with widespread depositor runs and bank stock price declines, the panic did not produce significant social costs in terms of failures among solvent banks. Copyright 1997 by American Economic Association.

Estimation and Inference in Econometrics

Abstract: Offering a unifying theoretical perspective not readily available in any other text, this innovative guide to econometrics uses simple geometrical arguments to develop students' intuitive understanding of basic and advanced topics, emphasizing throughout the practical applications of modern theory and nonlinear techniques of estimation. One theme of the text is the use of artificial regressions for estimation, reference, and specification testing of nonlinear models, including diagnostic tests for parameter constancy, serial correlation, heteroscedasticity, and other types of mis-specification. Explaining how estimates can be obtained and tests can be carried out, the authors go beyond a mere algebraic description to one that can be easily translated into the commands of a standard econometric software package. Covering an unprecedented range of problems with a consistent emphasis on those that arise in applied work, this accessible and coherent guide to the most vital topics in econometrics today is indispensable for advanced students of econometrics and students of statistics interested in regression and related topics. It will also suit practising econometricians who want to update their skills. Flexibly designed to accommodate a variety of course levels, it offers both complete coverage of the basic material and separate chapters on areas of specialized interest.

Tracing the Impact of Bank Liquidity Shocks: Evidence from an Emerging Market

Abstract: We examine the impact of liquidity shocks by exploiting cross-bank liquidity variation induced by unanticipated nuclear tests in Pakistan. We show that for the same firm borrowing from two different banks, its loan from the bank experiencing a 1 percent larger decline in liquidity drops by an additional 0.6 percent. While banks pass their liquidity shocks on to firms, large firms-particularly those with strong business or political ties-completely compensate this loss by additional borrowing through the credit market. Small firms are unable to do so and face large drops in overall borrowing and increased financial distress.

Bank concentration, competition, and crises: First results

Abstract: Motivated by public policy debates about bank consolidation and conflicting theoretical predictions about the relationship between bank concentration, bank competition and banking system fragility, this paper studies the impact of national bank concentration, bank regulations, and national institutions on the likelihood of a country suffering a systemic banking crisis. Using data on 69 countries from 1980 to 1997, we find that crises are less likely in economies with more concentrated banking systems even after controlling for differences in commercial bank regulatory policies, national institutions affecting competition, macroeconomic conditions, and shocks to the economy. Furthermore, the data indicate that regulatory policies and institutions that thwart competition are associated with greater banking system fragility.

Rethinking Bank Regulation: Till Angels Govern

Abstract: 1. Introduction: 1.A Motivation 1.B Objectives and contributions 1.C Key findings: a brief synopsis 1.D Guide to the book 2. Contrasting approaches to bank regulation: 2.A Two approaches to bank regulation: 2.A.1 Public interest approach 2.A.2 Private interest view of regulation 2.B Bank regulation: how 2.C The Basel Committee and regulatory convergence 2.D Conclusion 3. How are banks regulated and supervised around the world?: 3.A Overview 3.B Structure, scope and independence of regulation and supervision 3.C What is a 'bank'? 3.D Entry into banking, capital requirements and supervisory powers 3.E Explicit deposit insurance schemes 3.F Private monitoring and external governance 3.G Does bank ownership type affect the choice of regulations and supervisory practices? 3.H Forces for greater harmonization of regulation and supervision among countries 4. What works best: 4.A Goals and boundaries 4.B Bank regulation and supervision and bank development 4.C Bank supervision, regulation, and stability 4.D Bank supervision, regulation, and bank efficiency 4.E Bank supervision, regulation, and bank lending 4.F Supervision, regulation, and bank governance 4.G Summary of results 5. Choosing bank regulations 5.A Recap and motivation 5.B Motivating example: Mexico and the United States 5.C Conceptual framework 5.D Empirical framework and data 5.E Summary remarks 6. Rethinking bank regulation: 6.A Approach and context 6.B Lessons and implications.