Author
June Stevens
Other affiliations: University of Virginia, Sewanee: The University of the South, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center ...read more
Bio: June Stevens is an academic researcher from University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The author has contributed to research in topics: Body mass index & Overweight. The author has an hindex of 73, co-authored 258 publications receiving 29216 citations. Previous affiliations of June Stevens include University of Virginia & Sewanee: The University of the South.
Topics: Body mass index, Overweight, Population, Hazard ratio, Risk factor
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
TL;DR: This research presents a state-of-the-art online learning system that automates the very labor-intensive and therefore time-heavy and expensive and expensive process of manually cataloging and cataloging students' academic records.
Abstract: Harmon S. Jordan, ScD, Karima A. Kendall, PhD, Linda J. Lux, Roycelynn Mentor-Marcel, PhD, MPH, Laura C. Morgan, MA, Michael G. Trisolini, PhD, MBA, Janusz Wnek, PhD
Jeffrey L. Anderson, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair , Jonathan L. Halperin, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair-Elect , Nancy M. Albert, PhD, CCNS, CCRN,
3,259 citations
TL;DR: The estimated number of annual deaths attributable to obesity among US adults is approximately 280000 based onHRs from all subjects and 325000 based on HRs from only nonsmokers and never-smokers.
Abstract: ContextObesity is a major health problem in the United States, but the number
of obesity-attributable deaths has not been rigorously estimated.ObjectiveTo estimate the number of deaths, annually, attributable to obesity
among US adults.DesignData from 5 prospective cohort studies (the Alameda Community Health
Study, the Framingham Heart Study, the Tecumseh Community Health Study, the
American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study I, and the National Health
and Nutrition Examination Survey I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study) and 1 published
study (the Nurses' Health Study) in conjunction with 1991 national statistics
on body mass index distributions, population size, and overall deaths.SubjectsAdults, 18 years or older in 1991, classified by body mass index (kg/m2) as overweight (25-30), obese (30-35), and severely obese (>35).Main Outcome MeasureRelative hazard ratio (HR) of death for obese or overweight persons.ResultsThe estimated number of annual deaths attributable to obesity varied
with the cohort used to calculate the HRs, but findings were consistent overall.
More than 80% of the estimated obesity-attributable deaths occurred among
individuals with a body mass index of more than 30 kg/m2. When
HRs were estimated for all eligible subjects from all 6 studies, the mean
estimate of deaths attributable to obesity in the United States was 280,184
(range, 236,111-341,153). Hazard ratios also were calculated from data for
nonsmokers or never-smokers only. When these HRs were applied to the entire
population (assuming the HR applied to all individuals), the mean estimate
for obesity-attributable death was 324,940 (range, 262,541-383,410).ConclusionsThe estimated number of annual deaths attributable to obesity among
US adults is approximately 280,000 based on HRs from all subjects and 325,000
based on HRs from only nonsmokers and never-smokers.
1,954 citations
1,900 citations
University of Cambridge1, Harvard University2, Peking University3, National Institutes of Health4, University of Oxford5, Curtin University6, Australian National University7, Imperial College London8, American Cancer Society9, University of Southern California10, University of Sydney11, Johns Hopkins University12, Vanderbilt University13, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention14, University of Bristol15, Capital Medical University16, Erasmus University Rotterdam17, Yonsei University18, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center19, University of Turin20, University of Glasgow21, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill22, Shiga University of Medical Science23, Innsbruck Medical University24, International Agency for Research on Cancer25, University of Hong Kong26, Massey University27
TL;DR: The associations of both overweight and obesity with higher all-cause mortality were broadly consistent in four continents and supports strategies to combat the entire spectrum of excess adiposity in many populations.
1,731 citations
TL;DR: This data indicates that overweight and obesity in adults over the age of 40 is more likely to be a risk factor for adverse events than the other factors, including smoking, diet, and physical activity.
Abstract: Loria, Barbara E. Millen, Cathy A. Nonas, F. Xavier Pi-Sunyer, June Stevens, Victor J. Stevens, Karen A. Donato, Frank B. Hu, Van S. Hubbard, John M. Jakicic, Robert F. Kushner, Catherine M. Michael D. Jensen, Donna H. Ryan, Caroline M. Apovian, Jamy D. Ard, Anthony G. Comuzzie, Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS Guideline for the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults: A Print ISSN: 0009-7322. Online ISSN: 1524-4539 Copyright © 2013 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. is published by the American Heart Association, 7272 Greenville Avenue, Dallas, TX 75231 Circulation published online November 12, 2013; Circulation. http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/early/2013/11/11/01.cir.0000437739.71477.ee.citation World Wide Web at: The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/suppl/2013/11/07/01.cir.0000437739.71477.ee.DC1.html Data Supplement (unedited) at:
1,692 citations
Cited by
More filters
TL;DR: In those older than age 50, systolic blood pressure of greater than 140 mm Hg is a more important cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor than diastolic BP, and hypertension will be controlled only if patients are motivated to stay on their treatment plan.
Abstract: The National High Blood Pressure Education Program presents the complete Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Like its predecessors, the purpose is to provide an evidence-based approach to the prevention and management of hypertension. The key messages of this report are these: in those older than age 50, systolic blood pressure (BP) of greater than 140 mm Hg is a more important cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor than diastolic BP; beginning at 115/75 mm Hg, CVD risk doubles for each increment of 20/10 mm Hg; those who are normotensive at 55 years of age will have a 90% lifetime risk of developing hypertension; prehypertensive individuals (systolic BP 120-139 mm Hg or diastolic BP 80-89 mm Hg) require health-promoting lifestyle modifications to prevent the progressive rise in blood pressure and CVD; for uncomplicated hypertension, thiazide diuretic should be used in drug treatment for most, either alone or combined with drugs from other classes; this report delineates specific high-risk conditions that are compelling indications for the use of other antihypertensive drug classes (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers); two or more antihypertensive medications will be required to achieve goal BP (<140/90 mm Hg, or <130/80 mm Hg) for patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease; for patients whose BP is more than 20 mm Hg above the systolic BP goal or more than 10 mm Hg above the diastolic BP goal, initiation of therapy using two agents, one of which usually will be a thiazide diuretic, should be considered; regardless of therapy or care, hypertension will be controlled only if patients are motivated to stay on their treatment plan. Positive experiences, trust in the clinician, and empathy improve patient motivation and satisfaction. This report serves as a guide, and the committee continues to recognize that the responsible physician's judgment remains paramount.
14,975 citations
01 Jan 2014
TL;DR: These standards of care are intended to provide clinicians, patients, researchers, payors, and other interested individuals with the components of diabetes care, treatment goals, and tools to evaluate the quality of care.
Abstract: XI. STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING DIABETES CARE D iabetes is a chronic illness that requires continuing medical care and patient self-management education to prevent acute complications and to reduce the risk of long-term complications. Diabetes care is complex and requires that many issues, beyond glycemic control, be addressed. A large body of evidence exists that supports a range of interventions to improve diabetes outcomes. These standards of care are intended to provide clinicians, patients, researchers, payors, and other interested individuals with the components of diabetes care, treatment goals, and tools to evaluate the quality of care. While individual preferences, comorbidities, and other patient factors may require modification of goals, targets that are desirable for most patients with diabetes are provided. These standards are not intended to preclude more extensive evaluation and management of the patient by other specialists as needed. For more detailed information, refer to Bode (Ed.): Medical Management of Type 1 Diabetes (1), Burant (Ed): Medical Management of Type 2 Diabetes (2), and Klingensmith (Ed): Intensive Diabetes Management (3). The recommendations included are diagnostic and therapeutic actions that are known or believed to favorably affect health outcomes of patients with diabetes. A grading system (Table 1), developed by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and modeled after existing methods, was utilized to clarify and codify the evidence that forms the basis for the recommendations. The level of evidence that supports each recommendation is listed after each recommendation using the letters A, B, C, or E.
9,618 citations
TL;DR: The proportion of Asian people with a high risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease is substantial at BMIs lower than the existing WHO cut-off point for overweight (> or =25 kg/m2), but available data do not necessarily indicate a clear BMI cut-offs point for all Asians for overweight or obesity.
9,536 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors estimated deaths and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs; sum of years lived with disability [YLD] and years of life lost [YLL]) attributable to the independent effects of 67 risk factors and clusters of risk factors for 21 regions in 1990 and 2010.
9,324 citations
University of Washington1, Sapienza University of Rome2, Mekelle University3, University of Texas at San Antonio4, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences5, Debre markos University6, Emory University7, University of Oxford8, University of Cartagena9, United Nations Population Fund10, University of Birmingham11, Stanford University12, Aga Khan University13, University of Melbourne14, National Taiwan University15, University of Cambridge16, University of California, San Diego17, Public Health Foundation of India18, Public Health England19, University of Peradeniya20, Harvard University21, National Institutes of Health22, Tehran University of Medical Sciences23, Auckland University of Technology24, University of Sheffield25, University of Western Australia26, Karolinska Institutet27, Birzeit University28, Brandeis University29, American Cancer Society30, Ochsner Medical Center31, Yonsei University32, University of Bristol33, Heidelberg University34, Vanderbilt University35, South African Medical Research Council36, Jordan University of Science and Technology37, New Generation University College38, Northeastern University39, Simmons College40, Norwegian Institute of Public Health41, Boston University42, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention43, University of Bari44, University of São Paulo45, University of Otago46, University of Crete47, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh48, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center49, Teikyo University50, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre51, University of Tokyo52, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health53, Heriot-Watt University54, University of Alabama at Birmingham55, Griffith University56, National Center for Disease Control and Public Health57, University of California, Irvine58, Johns Hopkins University59, New York University60, University of Queensland61, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais62, National Research University – Higher School of Economics63, University of Bergen64, Columbia University65, Shandong University66, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill67, Fujita Health University68, Korea University69, Chongqing Medical University70, Zhejiang University71
TL;DR: The global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013 is estimated using a spatiotemporal Gaussian process regression model to estimate prevalence with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs).
9,180 citations