scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Juris Hartmanis

Bio: Juris Hartmanis is an academic researcher from Cornell University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Structural complexity theory & Computational complexity theory. The author has an hindex of 46, co-authored 171 publications receiving 10705 citations. Previous affiliations of Juris Hartmanis include National Research Council & General Electric.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is shown that instances of problems which appear naturally in computer science cannot be answered in formalized set theory, and that one can exhibit a specific context-free grammar G for which it cannot be proven in set theory.
Abstract: In this note we show that instances of problems which appear naturally in computer science cannot be answered in formalized set theory. We show, for example, that some relativized versions of the famous P = NP problem cannot be answered in formalized set theory, that explicit algorithms can be given whose running time is independent of the axioms of set theory, and that one can exhibit a specific context-free grammar G for which it cannot be proven in set theory that L(G) = Σ* or L(G) ≠ Σ*.

77 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
16 Oct 1978
TL;DR: Using known techniques of counting arguments and recursion theory, it is shown that certain log-tape reductions cannot be 1-L and sets are constructed that are complete under log-Tape reductions but not under 1- L reductions.
Abstract: One-way log-tape (1-L) reductions are mappings defined by log-tape Turing machines whose read head on the input can only move to the right. The 1-L reductions provide a more refined tool for studying the feasible complexity classes than the P-time [2,7] or log-tape [4] reductions. Although the 1-L computations are provably weaker than the feasible classes L, NL, P and NP, the known complete sets for those classes are complete under 1-L reductions. However, using known techniques of counting arguments and recursion theory we show that certain log-tape reductions cannot be 1-L and we construct sets that are complete under log-tape reductions but not under 1-L reductions.

76 citations

Book ChapterDOI
15 Jul 1986
TL;DR: Techniques for studying complexity classes that are not covered by known recursive enumerations of machines are developed by using them to examine the probabilistic class BPP and it is shown that there is a relativized world where BPPA has no complete languages.
Abstract: This paper develops techniques for studying complexity classes that are not covered by known recursive enumerations of machines. Often, counting classes, probabilistic classes, and intersection classes lack such enumerations. Concentrating on the counting class UP, we show that there are relativizations for which UPA has no complete languages and other relativizations for which PB ≠ UPB ≠ NPB and UPB has complete languages. Among other results we show that P ≠ UP if and only if there exists a set S in P of Boolean formulas with at most one satisfying assignment such that S ∩ SAT is not in P. P ≠ UP ∩ coUP if and only if there exists a set S in P of uniquely satisfiable Boolean formulas such that no polynomial-time machine can compute the solutions for the formulas in S. If UP has complete languages then there exists a set R in P of Boolean formulas with at most one satisfying assignment so that SAT ∩ R is complete for UP. Finally, we indicate the wide applicability of our techniques to counting and probabilistic classes by using them to examine the probabilistic class BPP. There is a relativized world where BPPA has no complete languages. If BPP has complete languages then it has a complete language of the form B ∩ MAJORITY, where B ∈ P and MAJORITY = {f | f is true for at least half of all assignments} is the canonical PP-complete set.

75 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Dec 1994
TL;DR: The Kolmogorov complexity of real numbers is investigated, and the Hausdorff dimension and the topological dimension of the graph of K are determined, which forms a fractal in the sense of Mandelbrot.
Abstract: We investigate the Kolmogorov complexity of real numbers. Let K be the Kolmogorov complexity function; we determine the Hausdorff dimension and the topological dimension of the graph of K. Since these dimensions are different, the graph of the Kolmogorov complexity function of the real line forms a fractal in the sense of Mandelbrot. We also solve an open problem of Razborov using our exact bound on the topological dimension.

74 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Juris Hartmanis1
TL;DR: It is shown how the amount of information flowing between the component machines in a realization can be studied by means of partition pairs.
Abstract: The object of this paper is to study the realization of a sequential machine from several smaller machines. The basic tools in this investigation are the partitions with the substitution property and the partition pairs. It is shown that to every (loop-free) realization of a sequential machine from n smaller machines corresponds a set of n partitions with the substitution property whose product is the zero partition. Conversely, it is shown that to every such set of n partitions corresponds a realization of the given sequential machine from n smaller machines. The natural ordering of these partitions is reflected in the information flow between the corresponding component machines and the algebraic operations defined between these partitions corresponding to the realization, govern the modifications of this realization. Finally, it is shown how the amount of information flowing between the component machines in a realization can be studied by means of partition pairs.

73 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Machine learning addresses many of the same research questions as the fields of statistics, data mining, and psychology, but with differences of emphasis.
Abstract: Machine Learning is the study of methods for programming computers to learn. Computers are applied to a wide range of tasks, and for most of these it is relatively easy for programmers to design and implement the necessary software. However, there are many tasks for which this is difficult or impossible. These can be divided into four general categories. First, there are problems for which there exist no human experts. For example, in modern automated manufacturing facilities, there is a need to predict machine failures before they occur by analyzing sensor readings. Because the machines are new, there are no human experts who can be interviewed by a programmer to provide the knowledge necessary to build a computer system. A machine learning system can study recorded data and subsequent machine failures and learn prediction rules. Second, there are problems where human experts exist, but where they are unable to explain their expertise. This is the case in many perceptual tasks, such as speech recognition, hand-writing recognition, and natural language understanding. Virtually all humans exhibit expert-level abilities on these tasks, but none of them can describe the detailed steps that they follow as they perform them. Fortunately, humans can provide machines with examples of the inputs and correct outputs for these tasks, so machine learning algorithms can learn to map the inputs to the outputs. Third, there are problems where phenomena are changing rapidly. In finance, for example, people would like to predict the future behavior of the stock market, of consumer purchases, or of exchange rates. These behaviors change frequently, so that even if a programmer could construct a good predictive computer program, it would need to be rewritten frequently. A learning program can relieve the programmer of this burden by constantly modifying and tuning a set of learned prediction rules. Fourth, there are applications that need to be customized for each computer user separately. Consider, for example, a program to filter unwanted electronic mail messages. Different users will need different filters. It is unreasonable to expect each user to program his or her own rules, and it is infeasible to provide every user with a software engineer to keep the rules up-to-date. A machine learning system can learn which mail messages the user rejects and maintain the filtering rules automatically. Machine learning addresses many of the same research questions as the fields of statistics, data mining, and psychology, but with differences of emphasis. Statistics focuses on understanding the phenomena that have generated the data, often with the goal of testing different hypotheses about those phenomena. Data mining seeks to find patterns in the data that are understandable by people. Psychological studies of human learning aspire to understand the mechanisms underlying the various learning behaviors exhibited by people (concept learning, skill acquisition, strategy change, etc.).

13,246 citations

Book
01 Jan 1974
TL;DR: This text introduces the basic data structures and programming techniques often used in efficient algorithms, and covers use of lists, push-down stacks, queues, trees, and graphs.
Abstract: From the Publisher: With this text, you gain an understanding of the fundamental concepts of algorithms, the very heart of computer science. It introduces the basic data structures and programming techniques often used in efficient algorithms. Covers use of lists, push-down stacks, queues, trees, and graphs. Later chapters go into sorting, searching and graphing algorithms, the string-matching algorithms, and the Schonhage-Strassen integer-multiplication algorithm. Provides numerous graded exercises at the end of each chapter. 0201000296B04062001

9,262 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors considered factoring integers and finding discrete logarithms on a quantum computer and gave an efficient randomized algorithm for these two problems, which takes a number of steps polynomial in the input size of the integer to be factored.
Abstract: A digital computer is generally believed to be an efficient universal computing device; that is, it is believed able to simulate any physical computing device with an increase in computation time by at most a polynomial factor. This may not be true when quantum mechanics is taken into consideration. This paper considers factoring integers and finding discrete logarithms, two problems which are generally thought to be hard on a classical computer and which have been used as the basis of several proposed cryptosystems. Efficient randomized algorithms are given for these two problems on a hypothetical quantum computer. These algorithms take a number of steps polynomial in the input size, e.g., the number of digits of the integer to be factored.

7,427 citations

Book
25 Apr 2008
TL;DR: Principles of Model Checking offers a comprehensive introduction to model checking that is not only a text suitable for classroom use but also a valuable reference for researchers and practitioners in the field.
Abstract: Our growing dependence on increasingly complex computer and software systems necessitates the development of formalisms, techniques, and tools for assessing functional properties of these systems. One such technique that has emerged in the last twenty years is model checking, which systematically (and automatically) checks whether a model of a given system satisfies a desired property such as deadlock freedom, invariants, and request-response properties. This automated technique for verification and debugging has developed into a mature and widely used approach with many applications. Principles of Model Checking offers a comprehensive introduction to model checking that is not only a text suitable for classroom use but also a valuable reference for researchers and practitioners in the field. The book begins with the basic principles for modeling concurrent and communicating systems, introduces different classes of properties (including safety and liveness), presents the notion of fairness, and provides automata-based algorithms for these properties. It introduces the temporal logics LTL and CTL, compares them, and covers algorithms for verifying these logics, discussing real-time systems as well as systems subject to random phenomena. Separate chapters treat such efficiency-improving techniques as abstraction and symbolic manipulation. The book includes an extensive set of examples (most of which run through several chapters) and a complete set of basic results accompanied by detailed proofs. Each chapter concludes with a summary, bibliographic notes, and an extensive list of exercises of both practical and theoretical nature.

4,905 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Gerard J. Holzmann1
01 May 1997
TL;DR: An overview of the design and structure of the verifier, its theoretical foundation, and an overview of significant practical applications are given.
Abstract: SPIN is an efficient verification system for models of distributed software systems. It has been used to detect design errors in applications ranging from high-level descriptions of distributed algorithms to detailed code for controlling telephone exchanges. The paper gives an overview of the design and structure of the verifier, reviews its theoretical foundation, and gives an overview of significant practical applications.

4,159 citations