scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Justin I. Read

Other affiliations: University of Leicester, University of Zurich, ETH Zurich  ...read more
Bio: Justin I. Read is an academic researcher from University of Surrey. The author has contributed to research in topics: Galaxy & Dark matter. The author has an hindex of 56, co-authored 164 publications receiving 13448 citations. Previous affiliations of Justin I. Read include University of Leicester & University of Zurich.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Luca Amendola1, Stephen Appleby2, Anastasios Avgoustidis3, David Bacon4, Tessa Baker5, Marco Baldi6, Marco Baldi7, Marco Baldi8, Nicola Bartolo6, Nicola Bartolo9, Alain Blanchard10, Camille Bonvin11, Stefano Borgani12, Stefano Borgani6, Enzo Branchini13, Enzo Branchini6, Clare Burrage3, Stefano Camera, Carmelita Carbone14, Carmelita Carbone6, Luciano Casarini15, Luciano Casarini16, Mark Cropper17, Claudia de Rham18, J. P. Dietrich19, Cinzia Di Porto, Ruth Durrer11, Anne Ealet, Pedro G. Ferreira5, Fabio Finelli6, Juan Garcia-Bellido20, Tommaso Giannantonio19, Luigi Guzzo6, Luigi Guzzo14, Alan Heavens18, Lavinia Heisenberg21, Catherine Heymans22, Henk Hoekstra23, Lukas Hollenstein, Rory Holmes, Zhiqi Hwang24, Knud Jahnke25, Thomas D. Kitching17, Tomi S. Koivisto26, Martin Kunz11, Giuseppe Vacca27, Eric V. Linder28, M. March29, Valerio Marra30, Carlos Martins31, Elisabetta Majerotto11, Dida Markovic32, David J. E. Marsh33, Federico Marulli8, Federico Marulli6, Richard Massey34, Yannick Mellier35, Francesco Montanari36, David F. Mota16, Nelson J. Nunes37, Will J. Percival32, Valeria Pettorino38, Valeria Pettorino39, Cristiano Porciani, Claudia Quercellini, Justin I. Read40, Massimiliano Rinaldi41, Domenico Sapone42, Ignacy Sawicki43, Roberto Scaramella, Constantinos Skordis44, Constantinos Skordis43, Fergus Simpson45, Andy Taylor22, Shaun A. Thomas, Roberto Trotta18, Licia Verde45, Filippo Vernizzi38, Adrian Vollmer, Yun Wang46, Jochen Weller19, T. G. Zlosnik47 
TL;DR: Euclid is a European Space Agency medium-class mission selected for launch in 2020 within the cosmic vision 2015-2025 program as discussed by the authors, which will explore the expansion history of the universe and the evolution of cosmic structures by measuring shapes and red-shift of galaxies as well as the distribution of clusters of galaxies over a large fraction of the sky.
Abstract: Euclid is a European Space Agency medium-class mission selected for launch in 2020 within the cosmic vision 2015–2025 program. The main goal of Euclid is to understand the origin of the accelerated expansion of the universe. Euclid will explore the expansion history of the universe and the evolution of cosmic structures by measuring shapes and red-shifts of galaxies as well as the distribution of clusters of galaxies over a large fraction of the sky. Although the main driver for Euclid is the nature of dark energy, Euclid science covers a vast range of topics, from cosmology to galaxy evolution to planetary research. In this review we focus on cosmology and fundamental physics, with a strong emphasis on science beyond the current standard models. We discuss five broad topics: dark energy and modified gravity, dark matter, initial conditions, basic assumptions and questions of methodology in the data analysis. This review has been planned and carried out within Euclid’s Theory Working Group and is meant to provide a guide to the scientific themes that will underlie the activity of the group during the preparation of the Euclid mission.

1,211 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This review is meant to provide a guide to the scientific themes that will underlie the activity of the group during the preparation of the Euclid mission and discusses five broad topics: dark energy and modified gravity, dark matter, initial conditions, basic assumptions and questions of methodology in the data analysis.
Abstract: Euclid is a European Space Agency medium class mission selected for launch in 2019 within the Cosmic Vision 2015-2025 programme. The main goal of Euclid is to understand the origin of the accelerated expansion of the Universe. Euclid will explore the expansion history of the Universe and the evolution of cosmic structures by measuring shapes and redshifts of galaxies as well as the distribution of clusters of galaxies over a large fraction of the sky. Although the main driver for Euclid is the nature of dark energy, Euclid science covers a vast range of topics, from cosmology to galaxy evolution to planetary research. In this review we focus on cosmology and fundamental physics, with a strong emphasis on science beyond the current standard models. We discuss five broad topics: dark energy and modified gravity, dark matter, initial conditions, basic assumptions and questions of methodology in the data analysis. This review has been planned and carried out within Euclid's Theory Working Group and is meant to provide a guide to the scientific themes that will underlie the activity of the group during the preparation of the Euclid mission.

896 citations

Journal Article
Gerry Gilmore, Sofia Randich, Martin Asplund, James Binney  +271 moreInstitutions (2)
TL;DR: The Gaia-ESO Public Spectroscopic Survey has begun and will obtain high quality spectroscopy of some 100000 Milky Way stars, in the field and in open clusters, down to magnitude 19, systematically.
Abstract: The Gaia-ESO Public Spectroscopic Survey has begun and will obtain high quality spectroscopy of some 100000 Milky Way stars, in the field and in open clusters, down to magnitude 19, systematically ...

672 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a comparison of grid and smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) techniques for interacting multiphase fluids is carried out, and it is shown that SPH introduces spurious pressure forces on particles in regions where there are steep density gradients.
Abstract: We have carried out a hydrodynamical code comparison study of interacting multiphase fluids. The two commonly used techniques of grid and smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) show striking differences in their ability to model processes that are fundamentally important across many areas of astrophysics. Whilst Eulerian grid based methods are able to resolve and treat important dynamical instabilities, such as Kelvin-Helmholtz or Rayleigh-Taylor, these processes are poorly or not at all resolved by existing SPH techniques. We show that the reason for this is that SPH, at least in its standard implementation, introduces spurious pressure forces on particles in regions where there are steep density gradients. This results in a boundary gap of the size of the SPH smoothing kernel over which information is not transferred.

622 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a comparison of grid and smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) was carried out by investigating their performance in modelling interacting multiphase fluids, and it was shown that SPH introduces spurious pressure forces on particles in regions where there are steep density gradients.
Abstract: We have carried out a comparison study of hydrodynamical codes by investigating their performance in modelling interacting multiphase fluids. The two commonly used techniques of grid and smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) show striking differences in their ability to model processes that are fundamentally important across many areas of astrophysics. Whilst Eulerian grid based methods are able to resolve and treat important dynamical instabilities, such as Kelvin-Helmholtz or Rayleigh-Taylor, these processes are poorly or not at all resolved by existing SPH techniques. We show that the reason for this is that SPH, at least in its standard implementation, introduces spurious pressure forces on particles in regions where there are steep density gradients. This results in a boundary gap of the size of an SPH smoothing kernel radius over which interactions are severely damped.

620 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal Article
TL;DR: The first direct detection of gravitational waves and the first observation of a binary black hole merger were reported in this paper, with a false alarm rate estimated to be less than 1 event per 203,000 years, equivalent to a significance greater than 5.1σ.
Abstract: On September 14, 2015 at 09:50:45 UTC the two detectors of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory simultaneously observed a transient gravitational-wave signal. The signal sweeps upwards in frequency from 35 to 250 Hz with a peak gravitational-wave strain of 1.0×10(-21). It matches the waveform predicted by general relativity for the inspiral and merger of a pair of black holes and the ringdown of the resulting single black hole. The signal was observed with a matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 24 and a false alarm rate estimated to be less than 1 event per 203,000 years, equivalent to a significance greater than 5.1σ. The source lies at a luminosity distance of 410(-180)(+160) Mpc corresponding to a redshift z=0.09(-0.04)(+0.03). In the source frame, the initial black hole masses are 36(-4)(+5)M⊙ and 29(-4)(+4)M⊙, and the final black hole mass is 62(-4)(+4)M⊙, with 3.0(-0.5)(+0.5)M⊙c(2) radiated in gravitational waves. All uncertainties define 90% credible intervals. These observations demonstrate the existence of binary stellar-mass black hole systems. This is the first direct detection of gravitational waves and the first observation of a binary black hole merger.

4,375 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Virgo Consortium's EAGLE project as discussed by the authors is a suite of hydrodynamical simulations that follow the formation of galaxies and black holes in representative volumes, where thermal energy is injected into the gas, allowing winds to develop without predetermined speed or mass loading factors.
Abstract: We introduce the Virgo Consortium's EAGLE project, a suite of hydrodynamical simulations that follow the formation of galaxies and black holes in representative volumes. We discuss the limitations of such simulations in light of their finite resolution and poorly constrained subgrid physics, and how these affect their predictive power. One major improvement is our treatment of feedback from massive stars and AGN in which thermal energy is injected into the gas without the need to turn off cooling or hydrodynamical forces, allowing winds to develop without predetermined speed or mass loading factors. Because the feedback efficiencies cannot be predicted from first principles, we calibrate them to the z~0 galaxy stellar mass function and the amplitude of the galaxy-central black hole mass relation, also taking galaxy sizes into account. The observed galaxy mass function is reproduced to ≲0.2 dex over the full mass range, 108

2,828 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, supermassive black holes (BHs) have been found in 85 galaxies by dynamical modeling of spatially resolved kinematics, and it has been shown that BHs and bulges coevolve by regulating each other's growth.
Abstract: Supermassive black holes (BHs) have been found in 85 galaxies by dynamical modeling of spatially resolved kinematics. The Hubble Space Telescope revolutionized BH research by advancing the subject from its proof-of-concept phase into quantitative studies of BH demographics. Most influential was the discovery of a tight correlation between BH mass and the velocity dispersion σ of the bulge component of the host galaxy. Together with similar correlations with bulge luminosity and mass, this led to the widespread belief that BHs and bulges coevolve by regulating each other's growth. Conclusions based on one set of correlations from in brightest cluster ellipticals to in the smallest galaxies dominated BH work for more than a decade. New results are now replacing this simple story with a richer and more plausible picture in which BHs correlate differently with different galaxy components. A reasonable aim is to use this progress to refine our understanding of BH-galaxy coevolution. BHs with masses of 105−106M...

2,804 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Shadab Alam1, Metin Ata2, Stephen Bailey3, Florian Beutler3, Dmitry Bizyaev4, Dmitry Bizyaev5, Jonathan Blazek6, Adam S. Bolton7, Joel R. Brownstein7, Angela Burden8, Chia-Hsun Chuang2, Chia-Hsun Chuang9, Johan Comparat9, Antonio J. Cuesta10, Kyle S. Dawson7, Daniel J. Eisenstein11, Stephanie Escoffier12, Héctor Gil-Marín13, Héctor Gil-Marín14, Jan Niklas Grieb15, Nick Hand16, Shirley Ho1, Karen Kinemuchi5, D. Kirkby17, Francisco S. Kitaura16, Francisco S. Kitaura2, Francisco S. Kitaura3, Elena Malanushenko5, Viktor Malanushenko5, Claudia Maraston18, Cameron K. McBride11, Robert C. Nichol18, Matthew D. Olmstead19, Daniel Oravetz5, Nikhil Padmanabhan8, Nathalie Palanque-Delabrouille, Kaike Pan5, Marcos Pellejero-Ibanez20, Marcos Pellejero-Ibanez21, Will J. Percival18, Patrick Petitjean22, Francisco Prada20, Francisco Prada9, Adrian M. Price-Whelan23, Beth Reid16, Beth Reid3, Sergio Rodríguez-Torres20, Sergio Rodríguez-Torres9, Natalie A. Roe3, Ashley J. Ross18, Ashley J. Ross6, Nicholas P. Ross24, Graziano Rossi25, Jose Alberto Rubino-Martin20, Jose Alberto Rubino-Martin21, Shun Saito15, Salvador Salazar-Albornoz15, Lado Samushia26, Ariel G. Sánchez15, Siddharth Satpathy1, David J. Schlegel3, Donald P. Schneider27, Claudia G. Scóccola28, Claudia G. Scóccola29, Claudia G. Scóccola9, Hee-Jong Seo30, Erin Sheldon31, Audrey Simmons5, Anže Slosar31, Michael A. Strauss23, Molly E. C. Swanson11, Daniel Thomas18, Jeremy L. Tinker32, Rita Tojeiro33, Mariana Vargas Magaña1, Mariana Vargas Magaña34, Jose Alberto Vazquez31, Licia Verde, David A. Wake35, David A. Wake36, Yuting Wang18, Yuting Wang37, David H. Weinberg6, Martin White3, Martin White16, W. Michael Wood-Vasey38, Christophe Yèche, Idit Zehavi39, Zhongxu Zhai33, Gong-Bo Zhao18, Gong-Bo Zhao37 
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present cosmological results from the final galaxy clustering data set of the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey, part of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey III.
Abstract: We present cosmological results from the final galaxy clustering data set of the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey, part of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey III. Our combined galaxy sample comprises 1.2 million massive galaxies over an effective area of 9329 deg^2 and volume of 18.7 Gpc^3, divided into three partially overlapping redshift slices centred at effective redshifts 0.38, 0.51 and 0.61. We measure the angular diameter distance and Hubble parameter H from the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) method, in combination with a cosmic microwave background prior on the sound horizon scale, after applying reconstruction to reduce non-linear effects on the BAO feature. Using the anisotropic clustering of the pre-reconstruction density field, we measure the product D_MH from the Alcock–Paczynski (AP) effect and the growth of structure, quantified by fσ_8(z), from redshift-space distortions (RSD). We combine individual measurements presented in seven companion papers into a set of consensus values and likelihoods, obtaining constraints that are tighter and more robust than those from any one method; in particular, the AP measurement from sub-BAO scales sharpens constraints from post-reconstruction BAOs by breaking degeneracy between D_M and H. Combined with Planck 2016 cosmic microwave background measurements, our distance scale measurements simultaneously imply curvature Ω_K = 0.0003 ± 0.0026 and a dark energy equation-of-state parameter w = −1.01 ± 0.06, in strong affirmation of the spatially flat cold dark matter (CDM) model with a cosmological constant (ΛCDM). Our RSD measurements of fσ_8, at 6 per cent precision, are similarly consistent with this model. When combined with supernova Ia data, we find H_0 = 67.3 ± 1.0 km s^−1 Mpc^−1 even for our most general dark energy model, in tension with some direct measurements. Adding extra relativistic species as a degree of freedom loosens the constraint only slightly, to H_0 = 67.8 ± 1.2 km s^−1 Mpc^−1. Assuming flat ΛCDM, we find Ω_m = 0.310 ± 0.005 and H_0 = 67.6 ± 0.5 km s^−1 Mpc^−1, and we find a 95 per cent upper limit of 0.16 eV c^−2 on the neutrino mass sum.

2,413 citations

01 Jan 2005
TL;DR: The Monthly Notices as mentioned in this paper is one of the three largest general primary astronomical research publications in the world, published by the Royal Astronomical Society (RAE), and it is the most widely cited journal in astronomy.
Abstract: Monthly Notices is one of the three largest general primary astronomical research publications. It is an international journal, published by the Royal Astronomical Society. This article 1 describes its publication policy and practice.

2,091 citations