scispace - formally typeset
J

Justin J. P. Jansen

Researcher at Erasmus University Rotterdam

Publications -  76
Citations -  15773

Justin J. P. Jansen is an academic researcher from Erasmus University Rotterdam. The author has contributed to research in topics: Ambidexterity & Organizational learning. The author has an hindex of 31, co-authored 72 publications receiving 14098 citations. Previous affiliations of Justin J. P. Jansen include Babson College.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A Socio-Psychological Perspective on Team Ambidexterity: The Contingency Role of Supportive Leadership Behaviours

TL;DR: In this article, the authors developed a multilevel contingency framework and proposed that the effectiveness of teams to achieve ambidexterity is contingent upon supportive leadership behaviours at the organizational level.
Journal ArticleDOI

Strategic leadership and leaders in entrepreneurial contexts: A nexus for innovation and impact missed?

TL;DR: In the special issue of the 2016 Special Issue on Strategic Leadership and Entrepreneurship as discussed by the authors, the authors provide a forum for works that build on the constraints, challenges, characteristics, and other salient elements of entrepreneurial settings to advance theory and testing on strategic leadership effects, as well as enrich our understanding of firm behaviour and outcomes in entrepreneurial contexts.

Ambidextrous Organizations. A Multiple-Level Study of Absorptive Capacity, Exploratory and Exploitative Innovation and Performance

TL;DR: In this paper, a multi-level framework was developed to explore how ambidextrous organizations can successfully cope with both exploratory and exploitative innovations across organizational units, and it was shown that organizational units require different types of combinative capabilities to influence their absorptive capacity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Top management team diversity and ambidexterity: The contingent role of shared responsibility and CEO cognitive trust

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors developed a synergistic perspective on TMT diversity and examined how two types of diversity (functional and age diversity) affect the achievement of organizational ambidexterity, and identified shared responsibility and CEO cognitive trust as important contingencies that may complement the effects of diversity within TMTs in terms of resolving potential conflicts and managing tensions between exploration and exploitation effectively.
Journal ArticleDOI

Structural and contextual approaches to ambidexterity: A meta-analysis of organizational and environmental contingencies

TL;DR: As research on ambidexterity enters the maturity stage, the findings suggest that structural separation helps firms of all sizes to balance exploration and exploitation, and thatStructural separation is more conducive for balancing exploration and exploit in high technology environments.