Justo P. Castaño

Bio: Justo P. Castaño is an academic researcher from University of Córdoba (Spain). The author has contributed to research in topics: Somatostatin & Somatotropic cell. The author has an hindex of 43, co-authored 238 publications receiving 5749 citations. Previous affiliations of Justo P. Castaño include University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign & Carlos III Health Institute.

THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2021/22: G protein-coupled receptors

Abstract: The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2021/22 is the fifth in this series of biennial publications. The Concise Guide provides concise overviews, mostly in tabular format, of the key properties of nearly 1900 human drug targets with an emphasis on selective pharmacology (where available), plus links to the open access knowledgebase source of drug targets and their ligands (www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties. Although the Concise Guide constitutes over 500 pages, the material presented is substantially reduced compared to information and links presented on the website. It provides a permanent, citable, point-in-time record that will survive database updates. The full contents of this section can be found at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/bph.15538. G protein-coupled receptors are one of the six major pharmacological targets into which the Guide is divided, with the others being: ion channels, nuclear hormone receptors, catalytic receptors, enzymes and transporters. These are presented with nomenclature guidance and summary information on the best available pharmacological tools, alongside key references and suggestions for further reading. The landscape format of the Concise Guide is designed to facilitate comparison of related targets from material contemporary to mid-2021, and supersedes data presented in the 2019/20, 2017/18, 2015/16 and 2013/14 Concise Guides and previous Guides to Receptors and Channels. It is produced in close conjunction with the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology (NC-IUPHAR), therefore, providing official IUPHAR classification and nomenclature for human drug targets, where appropriate.

Direct pituitary effects of kisspeptin: activation of gonadotrophs and somatotrophs and stimulation of luteinising hormone and growth hormone secretion.

Abstract: Recent, compelling evidence indicates that kisspeptins, the products of KiSS-1 gene, and their receptor GPR54, represent key elements in the neuroendocrine control of reproduction, and that they act primarily by regulating gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) secretion at the hypothalamus. Conversely, and despite earlier reports showing GPR54 expression in the pituitary, the potential physiological roles of kisspeptins at this gland have remained elusive. To clarify this issue, cultures of rat pituitary cells were used to evaluate expression of KiSS-1 and GPR54, and to monitor the ability of kisspeptin-10 to stimulate Ca(2+) responses in gonadotrophs and to elicit luteinising hormone (LH) secretion in vitro. The results obtained show that both GPR54 and KiSS-1 are expressed in the pituitary of peripubertal male and female rats. Moreover, kisspeptin-10 induced a rise in free cytosolic Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) in approximately 10% of male rat pituitary cells. Intriguingly, kisspeptin-responsive cells included not only gonadotrophs, in which a 62.8 +/- 16.0%[Ca(2+)](i) rise was observed, but also somatotrophs, wherein kisspeptin induced a 60.3 +/- 5.5%[Ca(2+)](i) increase. Accordingly, challenge of dispersed pituitary cells with increasing kisspeptin-10 concentrations induced dose-related LH and growth hormone (GH) secretory responses, which were nevertheless of lower magnitude than those evoked by the primary regulators GnRH and GH-releasing hormone, respectively. In particular, 10(-8) M kisspeptin caused maximal increases in LH release (218.7 +/- 23.6% and 180.4 +/- 7.2% in male and female rat pituitary cells, respectively), and also stimulated maximally GH secretion (181.9 +/- 14.9% and 260.2 +/- 15.9% in male and female rat pituitary cells, respectively). Additionally, moderate summation of kisspeptin- and GnRH-induced LH responses was observed after short-term incubation of male rat pituitary cells. In conclusion, our results provide unequivocal evidence that kisspeptins exert direct pituitary effects in peripubertal male and female rats and suggest a possible autocrine/paracrine mode of action. The precise relevance and underlying mechanisms of this potential new actions of kisspeptins (i.e. the direct modulation of gonadotrophic and somatotrophic axis at the pituitary) deserve further analysis.

Regulation of pituitary cell function by adiponectin.

Abstract: Adiponectin is a member of the family of adipose tissue-related hormones known as adipokines, which exerts antidiabetic, antiatherogenic, antiinflammatory, and antiangiogenic properties. Adiponectin actions are primarily mediated through binding to two receptors expressed in several tissues, AdipoR1 and AdipoR2. Likewise, adiponectin expression has been detected in adipocytes as well as in a variety of extra-adipose tissues, including the chicken pituitary. Interestingly, adiponectin secretion and adiponectin receptor expression in adipocytes have been shown to be regulated by pituitary hormones. These observations led us to investigate whether adiponectin, like the adipokine leptin, regulates pituitary hormone production. Specifically, we focused our analysis on somatotrophs and gonadotrophs because of the relationship between the control of energy metabolism, growth and reproduction. To this end, the effects of adiponectin on both GH and LH secretion as well as its interaction with major stimulatory reg...

Intracellular Signaling Mechanisms Mediating Ghrelin-Stimulated Growth Hormone Release in Somatotropes

Abstract: Ghrelin is a newly discovered peptide that binds the receptor for GH secretagogues (GHS-R). The presence of both ghrelin and GHS-Rs in the hypothalamic-pituitary system, together with the ability of ghrelin to increase GH release, suggests a hypophysiotropic role for this peptide. To ascertain the intracellular mechanisms mediating the action of ghrelin in somatotropes, we evaluated ghrelin-induced GH release from pig pituitary cells both under basal conditions and after specific blockade of key steps of cAMP-, inositol phosphate-, and Ca 2 -dependent signaling routes. Ghrelin stimulated GH release at concentrations ranging from 10 10 to 10 6 M. Its effects were comparable with those exerted by GHRH or the GHS L-163,255. Combined treatment with ghrelin and GHRH or L-163,255 did not cause further increases in GH release, whereas somatostatin abolished the effect of ghrelin. Blockade of phospholipase C or protein kinase C inhibited ghrelininduced GH secretion, suggesting a requisite role for this route in ghrelin action. Unexpectedly, inhibition of either adenylate cyclase or protein kinase A also suppressed ghrelininduced GH release. In addition, ghrelin stimulated cAMP production and also had an additive effect with GHRH on cAMP accumulation. Ghrelin also increased free intracellular Ca 2 levels in somatotropes. Moreover, ghrelin-induced GH release was entirely dependent on extracellular Ca 2 influx through L-type voltage-sensitive channels. These results indicate that ghrelin exerts a direct stimulatory action on porcine GH release that is not additive with that of GHRH and requires the contribution of a multiple, complex set of interdependent intracellular signaling pathways. (Endocrinology 144: 5372–5380, 2003)

Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes

Abstract: XI. STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING DIABETES CARE D iabetes is a chronic illness that requires continuing medical care and patient self-management education to prevent acute complications and to reduce the risk of long-term complications. Diabetes care is complex and requires that many issues, beyond glycemic control, be addressed. A large body of evidence exists that supports a range of interventions to improve diabetes outcomes. These standards of care are intended to provide clinicians, patients, researchers, payors, and other interested individuals with the components of diabetes care, treatment goals, and tools to evaluate the quality of care. While individual preferences, comorbidities, and other patient factors may require modification of goals, targets that are desirable for most patients with diabetes are provided. These standards are not intended to preclude more extensive evaluation and management of the patient by other specialists as needed. For more detailed information, refer to Bode (Ed.): Medical Management of Type 1 Diabetes (1), Burant (Ed): Medical Management of Type 2 Diabetes (2), and Klingensmith (Ed): Intensive Diabetes Management (3). The recommendations included are diagnostic and therapeutic actions that are known or believed to favorably affect health outcomes of patients with diabetes. A grading system (Table 1), developed by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and modeled after existing methods, was utilized to clarify and codify the evidence that forms the basis for the recommendations. The level of evidence that supports each recommendation is listed after each recommendation using the letters A, B, C, or E.

The somatic genomic landscape of glioblastoma

Abstract: We describe the landscape of somatic genomic alterations based on multidimensional and comprehensive characterization of more than 500 glioblastoma tumors (GBMs). We identify several novel mutated genes as well as complex rearrangements of signature receptors, including EGFR and PDGFRA. TERT promoter mutations are shown to correlate with elevated mRNA expression, supporting a role in telomerase reactivation. Correlative analyses confirm that the survival advantage of the proneural subtype is conferred by the G-CIMP phenotype, and MGMT DNA methylation may be a predictive biomarker for treatment response only in classical subtype GBM. Integrative analysis of genomic and proteomic profiles challenges the notion of therapeutic inhibition of a pathway as an alternative to inhibition of the target itself. These data will facilitate the discovery of therapeutic and diagnostic target candidates, the validation of research and clinical observations and the generation of unanticipated hypotheses that can advance our molecular understanding of this lethal cancer.

Prolactin: Structure, Function, and Regulation of Secretion

Abstract: Prolactin is a protein hormone of the anterior pituitary gland that was originally named for its ability to promote lactation in response to the suckling stimulus of hungry young mammals. We now know that prolactin is not as simple as originally described. Indeed, chemically, prolactin appears in a multiplicity of posttranslational forms ranging from size variants to chemical modifications such as phosphorylation or glycosylation. It is not only synthesized in the pituitary gland, as originally described, but also within the central nervous system, the immune system, the uterus and its associated tissues of conception, and even the mammary gland itself. Moreover, its biological actions are not limited solely to reproduction because it has been shown to control a variety of behaviors and even play a role in homeostasis. Prolactin-releasing stimuli not only include the nursing stimulus, but light, audition, olfaction, and stress can serve a stimulatory role. Finally, although it is well known that dopamine of hypothalamic origin provides inhibitory control over the secretion of prolactin, other factors within the brain, pituitary gland, and peripheral organs have been shown to inhibit or stimulate prolactin secretion as well. It is the purpose of this review to provide a comprehensive survey of our current understanding of prolactin's function and its regulation and to expose some of the controversies still existing.