scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Justyna Kusztal

Bio: Justyna Kusztal is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Justice (ethics) & Child protection. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 1 publications receiving 6 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
03 Mar 2021
TL;DR: In this paper, the legal status and the state of scientific research on the implementation of national policy on the protection of the rights of children forced to participate in court proceedings are presented.
Abstract: The aim of the article is to present the legal status and the state of scientific research on the implementation of national policy on the protection of the rights of children forced to participate in court proceedings. It is based on a method of analysis of the content of formal documents and selected research reports in the years 2015–2018 concerning the issues of child protection in contact with the justice system. The analysis of the research reports has led us to the conclusion that it is necessary to prepare judges and the police for the interrogation of children, but also to prepare them for contact with the institutional justice system through competently organised education on children’s rights.

9 citations


Cited by
More filters
MonographDOI
11 Sep 2019
TL;DR: Goldson et al. as discussed by the authors present a collection of essays that expose violence in criminal justice systems around the world and those held in penal detention are especially vulnerable, and chart ways in which it can be, and must be, addressed.
Abstract: violence in criminal ‘justice’ systems around the world and those held in penal detention are especially vulnerable. This collection of essays both exposes such phenomena and charts ways in which it can be, and must be, addressed. The book makes a timely and important contribution to an evolving literature and it comprises an essential point of reference for researchers, advocates, policymakers and practitioners alike’. Professor Barry Goldson, Department of Sociology, Social Policy and Criminology, The University of Liverpool, UK

15 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Feb 2021-Young
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined appeals against restrictive measures in child protection submitted to and decided upon by administrative courts in Finland and concluded that such measures used in care restrict children'...
Abstract: The article examines appeals against restrictive measures in child protection submitted to and decided upon by administrative courts in Finland. Restrictive measures used in care restrict children’...

12 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors explore the notion that children essentially think and behave "in the moment" and explore the implications of this for our understanding of children and crime. But they do not consider the role of children in the criminal justice system.
Abstract: Traditional approaches to understanding and responding to children and crime are fundamentally based on ‘miniaturised’ adult models. The assumption appears to be that children are adults in the making, essentially just smaller, developing versions of grown-ups. This view of children is increasingly being challenged. Children are not simply putative adults, they are different, distinct and developing. This article sets out to explore the notion that children essentially think and behave ‘in the moment’. The implications of this for our understanding of children and crime are also explored.

11 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Barnahus model as mentioned in this paper is an inter-agency, co-located model for working with cases of violence and abuse in Nordic countries, which was originally developed in Iceland and subsequently spread to all the Nordic countries.
Abstract: The Barnahus model was launched in Iceland in 1998, and it subsequently spread to all the Nordic countries. It is an interagency, co-located model for working with cases of violence and abuse again...

10 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is ascertained that infant enfranchisement is highly undesirable and that there are more viable forms to promote infant political agency, such as virtual representation, infant-beneficial principles of political action and ombudspersons for infants.
Abstract: Epistemic impairment has been the decisive yardstick when excluding infants from political agency. One of the suggestions to bypass the epistemic requirement of political agency and to encourage th...

9 citations