scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

K.D. Pedersen

Bio: K.D. Pedersen is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Bone age. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 1 publications receiving 284 citations.
Topics: Bone age

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The method reconstructs, from radiographs of the hand, the borders of 15 bones automatically and then computes ldquointrinsicrdquo bone ages for each of 13 bones (radius, ulna, and 11 short bones) and transforms the intrinsic bone ages into Greulich Pyle or Tanner Whitehouse bone age.
Abstract: Bone age rating is associated with a considerable variability from the human interpretation, and this is the motivation for presenting a new method for automated determination of bone age (skeletal maturity). The method, called BoneXpert, reconstructs, from radiographs of the hand, the borders of 15 bones automatically and then computes ldquointrinsicrdquo bone ages for each of 13 bones (radius, ulna, and 11 short bones). Finally, it transforms the intrinsic bone ages into Greulich Pyle (GP) or Tanner Whitehouse (TW) bone age. The bone reconstruction method automatically rejects images with abnormal bone morphology or very poor image quality. From the methodological point of view, BoneXpert contains the following innovations: 1) a generative model (active appearance model) for the bone reconstruction; 2) the prediction of bone age from shape, intensity, and texture scores derived from principal component analysis; 3) the consensus bone age concept that defines bone age of each bone as the best estimate of the bone age of the other bones in the hand; 4) a common bone age model for males and females; and 5) the unified modelling of TW and GP bone age. BoneXpert is developed on 1559 images. It is validated on the Greulich Pyle atlas in the age range 2-17 years yielding an SD of 0.42 years [0.37; 0.47] 95% conf, and on 84 clinical TW-rated images yielding an SD of 0.80 years [0.68; 0.93] 95% conf. The precision of the GP bone age determination (its ability to yield the same result on a repeated radiograph) is inferred under suitable assumptions from six longitudinal series of radiographs. The result is an SD on a single determination of 0.17 years [0.13; 0.21] 95% conf.

333 citations


Cited by
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI
12 Aug 2012
TL;DR: This work describes a means of extracting the k best shapelets from a data set in a single pass, and then uses these shapelets to transform data by calculating the distances from a series to each shapelet.
Abstract: The problem of time series classification (TSC), where we consider any real-valued ordered data a time series, presents a specific machine learning challenge as the ordering of variables is often crucial in finding the best discriminating features. One of the most promising recent approaches is to find shapelets within a data set. A shapelet is a time series subsequence that is identified as being representative of class membership. The original research in this field embedded the procedure of finding shapelets within a decision tree. We propose disconnecting the process of finding shapelets from the classification algorithm by proposing a shapelet transformation. We describe a means of extracting the k best shapelets from a data set in a single pass, and then use these shapelets to transform data by calculating the distances from a series to each shapelet. We demonstrate that transformation into this new data space can improve classification accuracy, whilst retaining the explanatory power provided by shapelets.

329 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A deep-learning convolutional neural network model can estimate skeletal maturity with accuracy similar to that of an expert radiologist and to that that of existing automated models.
Abstract: A deep-learning convolutional neural network model can estimate skeletal maturity with accuracy similar to that of an expert radiologist and to that of current state-of-the-art feature extraction–based automated models for assessment of bone age.

322 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper proposes and test several deep learning approaches to assess skeletal bone age automatically and shows an average discrepancy between manual and automatic evaluation of about 0.8 years, which is state‐of‐the‐art performance.

314 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A fully automated deep learning pipeline to segment a region of interest, standardize and preprocess input radiographs, and perform BAA was proposed and deployed in the clinical environment for more accurate and efficient BAAs at much faster interpretation time (<2 s) than the conventional method.
Abstract: Skeletal maturity progresses through discrete phases, a fact that is used routinely in pediatrics where bone age assessments (BAAs) are compared to chronological age in the evaluation of endocrine and metabolic disorders. While central to many disease evaluations, little has changed to improve the tedious process since its introduction in 1950. In this study, we propose a fully automated deep learning pipeline to segment a region of interest, standardize and preprocess input radiographs, and perform BAA. Our models use an ImageNet pretrained, fine-tuned convolutional neural network (CNN) to achieve 57.32 and 61.40% accuracies for the female and male cohorts on our held-out test images. Female test radiographs were assigned a BAA within 1 year 90.39% and within 2 years 98.11% of the time. Male test radiographs were assigned 94.18% within 1 year and 99.00% within 2 years. Using the input occlusion method, attention maps were created which reveal what features the trained model uses to perform BAA. These correspond to what human experts look at when manually performing BAA. Finally, the fully automated BAA system was deployed in the clinical environment as a decision supporting system for more accurate and efficient BAAs at much faster interpretation time (<2 s) than the conventional method.

302 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors review the principles of CAD for lesion detection and for quantification and illustrate the state-of-the-art with various examples and the requirements that radiologists have for CAD are discussed.
Abstract: Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD), encompassing computer-aided detection and quantification, is an established and rapidly growing field of research. In daily practice, however, most radiologists do not yet use CAD routinely. This article discusses how to move CAD from the laboratory to the clinic. The authors review the principles of CAD for lesion detection and for quantification and illustrate the state-of-the-art with various examples. The requirements that radiologists have for CAD are discussed: sufficient performance, no increase in reading time, seamless workflow integration, regulatory approval, and cost efficiency. Performance is still the major bottleneck for many CAD systems. Novel ways of using CAD, extending the traditional paradigm of displaying markers for a second look, may be the key to using the technology effectively. The most promising strategy to improve CAD is the creation of publicly available databases for training and validation. This can identify the most fruitful new research directions, and provide a platform to combine multiple approaches for a single task to create superior algorithms.

260 citations