scispace - formally typeset
K

Kai Mikkonen

Researcher at University of Helsinki

Publications -  34
Citations -  176

Kai Mikkonen is an academic researcher from University of Helsinki. The author has contributed to research in topics: Narrative & Comics. The author has an hindex of 8, co-authored 27 publications receiving 154 citations. Previous affiliations of Kai Mikkonen include University of Paris III: Sorbonne Nouvelle.

Papers
More filters

Everyday knowledge in understanding fictional characters and their worlds

TL;DR: In this article, the authors look closer at the common claim made in recent cognitive literary studies that the audience's everyday world knowledge is the core mechanism in understanding characters in fiction and discuss in particular four crucial aspects of reading fiction that are missing in Sanford and Emmott's model.
Journal ArticleDOI

The modernist traveller in Africa: Africanism and the European author's self-fashioning

TL;DR: The relationship between European modernist traveller's self-fashioning and the representation of Sub-Saharan African cultures, spaces and cross-cultural encounters in the early 20th century is explored in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

“The marquise went out at 5 o’clock”: Novel beginnings and realistic expectations

TL;DR: This paper examined the way in which the given narrative mood (perspective, type of discourse) and the initial narrating instance (or narrative situation) relate to generic expectations in nineteenth-century European novels.
Journal ArticleDOI

Tekstianalyysin ja lukukokemuksen mahdoton yhtälö

Kai Mikkonen
TL;DR: The authors examines Peter J Rabinowitz's notions of "authorial audience" and "narrative audience" in terms of their relevance as pedagogical tools in the univer¬sity classroom.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Rhetorics of Plot Function: Henry James's ficelle, Vladimir Nabokov's “Perry,” and James Phelan's “Synthetic Function” Reconsidered

Kai Mikkonen
- 01 Mar 2022 - 
TL;DR: In this article , the reader's active role in responding to the author's rhetorical strategy is discussed, and the authors argue that much more work can be done with this category of characters.