scispace - formally typeset
K

Kara D. Federmeier

Researcher at University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign

Publications -  149
Citations -  15979

Kara D. Federmeier is an academic researcher from University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign. The author has contributed to research in topics: N400 & Sentence. The author has an hindex of 51, co-authored 142 publications receiving 14203 citations. Previous affiliations of Kara D. Federmeier include University of California, San Diego & Urbana University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event related brain potential (ERP)

TL;DR: The effectiveness of the N400 as a dependent variable for examining almost every aspect of language processing is emphasized and its expanding use to probe semantic memory is highlighted to determine how the neurocognitive system dynamically and flexibly uses bottom-up and top-down information to make sense of the world.
Journal ArticleDOI

Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension

TL;DR: Findings using an electrophysiological brain component, the N400, that reveal the nature and timing of semantic memory use during language comprehension support a view of memory in which world knowledge is distributed across multiple, plastic-yet-structured, largely modality-specific processing areas, and in which meaning is an emergent, temporally extended process.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Rose by Any Other Name: Long-Term Memory Structure and Sentence Processing

TL;DR: In this paper, the effects of sentential context and semantic memory structure during on-line sentence processing were examined by recording event-related brain potentials as individuals read pairs of sentences for comprehension.
Journal ArticleDOI

Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension.

TL;DR: Results suggest that, when it can, the brain uses context to predict features of likely upcoming items, and that left hemisphere language processing seems to be oriented toward prediction and the use of top-down cues, whereas right hemisphere comprehension is more bottom-up, biased toward the veridical maintenance of information.