Plants are constantly being challenged by aspiring pathogens, but disease is rare. Why? Broadly, there are three reasons for pathogen failure. Either (1) the plant is unable to support the niche requirements of a potential pathogen and is thus a non? host; or (2) the plant possesses preformed structural barriers or toxic compounds that confine successful infections to specialized pathogen species; or (3) upon recognition of the attacking pathogen, defense mechanisms are elaborated and the invasion remains localized. All three types of interaction are said to be incompatible, but only the latter resistance mech? anism depends on induced responses. Successful pathogen invasion and disease (compatibility) ensue if the preformed plant defenses are inappropriate, the plant does not detect the pathogen, or the activated defense responses are ineffective. In this review, we examine the essential prerequisites for patho? gen recognition and the induction of localized defense responses. Preformed defenses are considered elsewhere in this issue (see Osbourn, 1996, in this issue). Race-specific pathogen recognition is hypothesized to re? sult from the direct or indirect interaction of the product of a dominant or semidominant plant resistance (R) gene with a product derived from the corresponding dominant pathogen avirulence (Avr) gene (Keen, 1992; Staskawicz et al., 1995). Subsequent signal transduction events are assumed to coordinate the activation of an array of defense responses. This "simple" model appears to explain much but begs many questions. For example, R gene products are likely to provide key components for recognition, but how do the distinct classes of R proteins characterized to date (see Bent, 1996, in this is? sue) activate the defense response? Do different R gene classes activate distinct responses? The regulation of some components of defense mechanisms has been studied in plant cell cultures in response to non-race-specific elicitors, but to what extent do such studies provide a model for R gene func? tion? Plant resistance is often correlated with the activation of specific defense responses, but which (if any) are required to abolish or retard pathogen growth, and how? Which are pri? mary responses and which are secondary? Does the first response involve transcriptional regulation, the activation of preformed enzymes, and/or the opening of ion channels, or

Resistance gene-dependent plant defense responses.

Transgenic tobacco and Arabidopsis thaliana expressing the bacterial enzyme salicylate hydroxylase cannot accumulate salicylic acid (SA). This defect not only makes the plants unable to induce systemic acquired resistance, but also leads to increased susceptibility to viral, fungal, and bacterial pathogens. The enhanced susceptibility extends even to host-pathogen combinations that would normally result in genetic resistance. Therefore, SA accumulation is essential for expression of multiple modes of plant disease resistance.

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/266/5188/1247.full.pdf

A Central Role of Salicylic Acid in Plant Disease Resistance

Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) is a general defense response in plants that is characterized by the expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes. SAR can be induced after a hypersensitive response to an avirulent pathogen or by treatment with either salicylic acid (SA) or 2,6-dichloroisonicotinic acid (INA). To dissect the signal transduction pathway of SAR, we isolated an Arabidopsis mutant that lacks the expression of an SA-, INA-, and pathogen-responsive chimeric reporter gene composed of the 5[prime] untranslated region of an Arabidopsis PR gene, [beta]-1,3-glucanase (BGL2), and the coding region of [beta]-glucuronidase (GUS). This mutant, npr1 (nonexpresser of PR genes), carries a single recessive mutation that abolishes the SAR-responsive expression of other PR genes as well. While SA-, INA-, or avirulent pathogen-induced SAR protects wild-type plants from Pseudomonas syringae infection, the mutant cannot be protected by pretreatment with these inducers. The insensitivity of npr1 to SA, INA, and avirulent pathogens in SAR induction indicates that these inducers share a common signal transduction pathway. Moreover, in npr1, the localized expression of PR genes induced by a virulent Pseudomonas pathogen is disrupted, and the lesion formed is less confined. These results suggest a role for PR genes in preventing the proximal spread of pathogens in addition to their suggested role in SAR.

/pdf/characterization-of-an-arabidopsis-mutant-that-is-1dv7tzhdxf.pdf

Characterization of an Arabidopsis Mutant That Is Nonresponsive to Inducers of Systemic Acquired Resistance.

This paper examines induced resistance (SAR) in plants against various insect and pathogenic invaders. SAR confers quantitative protection against a broad spectrum of microorganisms in a manner comparable to immunization in mammals, although the underlying mechanisms differ. Discussed here are the molecular events underlying SAR: the mechanisms involved in SAR, including lignification and other structural barriers, pathogenesis-related proteins and their expression, and the signals for SAR including salicylic acid. Recent findings on the biological role of systemin, ethylene, jasmonates, and electrical signals are reviewed. Chemical activators of SAR comprise inorganic compounds, natural compounds, and synthetic compounds. Plants known to exhibit SAR and induced systemic resistance are listed.

Systemic acquired resistance

A complementary DNA encoding a salicylic acid (SA)-binding protein has been cloned. Its properties suggest involvement in SA-mediated induction of systemic acquired resistance (SAR) in plants. The sequence of the protein is similar to that of catalases and the protein exhibits catalase activity. Salicylic acid specifically inhibited the catalase activity in vitro and induced an increase in H2O2 concentrations in vivo. H2O2 or compounds, such as SA, that inhibit catalases or enhance the generation of H2O2, induced expression of defense-related genes associated with SAR. Thus, the action of SA in SAR is likely mediated by elevated amounts of H2O2.

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/262/5141/1883.full.pdf

Active oxygen species in the induction of plant systemic acquired resistance by salicylic acid

The production of enzymes capable of degrading the cell walls of invading phytopathogenic fungi is an important component of the defense response of plants. The timing of this natural host defense mechanism was modified to produce fungal-resistant plants. Transgenic tobacco seedlings constitutively expressing a bean chitinase gene under control of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter showed an increased ability to survive in soil infested with the fungal pathogen Rhizoctonia solani and delayed development of disease symptoms.

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/254/5035/1194.full.pdf

Karen Brogue

Papers

Transgenic Plants with Enhanced Resistance to the Fungal Pathogen Rhizoctonia solani