scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Katsuhiko Kusaka

Bio: Katsuhiko Kusaka is an academic researcher from Kansai University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Flow (mathematics) & Mass transfer coefficient. The author has an hindex of 4, co-authored 5 publications receiving 170 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, an empirical equation of liquid holdup and interfacial areas was presented in terms of Reynolds numbers of gas Reg( =dsGg/μg) and liquid Rel, surface shape factor of packing φ, void fraction e and ratio of packing to column diameter dp/T, where the ratio is smaller than 0.13.
Abstract: Liquid holdup and interfacial areas were measured in packed columns with cocurrent downward flow. An empirical equation of liquid holdup Φt is presented in terms of Reynolds numbers of gas Reg(=dsGg/μg) and liquid Rel, surface shape factor of packing φ, void fraction e and ratio of packing to column diameter dp/T, where the ratio is smaller than 0.13. This equation is different for the dispersed bubble flow and other flow regions. The empirical equation of interfacial area ap in the respective flow regions varies as follows: apdp/(1-Φl/e)=ωΦ-mRenlReqg(dp/T)-twhere ω=7.5×10-5, m=Q.2, n=Q.15, q=2/3, t=2.5 for spray flow; ω=2.2×10-4, m=0.3, n=2/3, q=0.2, t=2.5 for pulse flow; ω=3.9×10-3, m=0.1, n=0.4, q=p. t=2 for trickle flow; ω=2.8×10-7, m=0.9, n=1.8, q=0, t=3.3 for dispersed bubble flow. The equation of the boundary in the respective flow regions was found by equating the two of them. The predicted boundaries are in excellent agreement with the literature data given from the analysis of liquid pulse frequencies. The predictions for interfacial areas also agree well with the literature data.

66 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors measured liquid-phase volumetric coefficients and Peclet numbers in liquid mixing with cocurrent downwardflow in packed columns and obtained the boundaries for the respective flow regions, obtained by combining two of these equations.
Abstract: Liquid-phase volumetric coefficients and Peclet numbers in liquid mixing were measured in packed columns with cocurrent downwardflow. The empirical equations of liquid-phase volumetric coefficient are distinctly different in spray, pulse and dispersed bubble flow regions. The boundaries for the respective flow regions, obtained by combining two of these equations of volumetric coefficient, are in good agreement with the boundaries which have previously been given from the equations of interfacial area in the same fashion. The foam flow region, which gives the maximumvalue of liquid-phase mass-transfer coefficient, was found at higher gas Reynolds number in comparison with pulse and dispersed bubble flow regions. Taking the ratio of packing to column diameter dp/T and surface shape factor of packing into consideration, the empirical equation of mass-transfer coefficient is presented in respective flow regions as

65 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors measured liquid holdup and interfacial area in columns packed with 1/2 and 1 in. ceramic spheres for upward cocurrent-flow mode, where the ratio of packing to column diameter, dp/dT, is 0.085, 0.128 and 0.169.
Abstract: Liquid holdup and interfacial area were measured in columns packed with 1/2 and 1 in. ceramic spheres for upward cocurrent-flow mode, where the ratio of packing to column diameter, dp/dT, is 0.085, 0.128 and 0.169. The empirical equations of liquid holdup Φl for void fraction e are given as follows: Φl/e=κRehiRe-jgwhere κ=1.8, h=0.03, j=0.28 for Rel 695Reg-0.5. The empirical equations for interfacial area ap are also presented as follows: apdp/(1-Φl/e)=αRemlReno(dp/dT)-twhere the values of α, m, n and t are 16, 0.05, -0.4 and 0 for bubble (1), 2.2, 0.05, -0.2 and 0.5 for churn, 0.24. 0.27, 0 and 0.7 for pseudospray, 0.26, 2/3, -1/4 and 0.4 for bubble (11), 1.0×10-2, 2/3, 0 and 1.4 for pseudopulse and 2.9×10-4, 2/3, 0.2 and 2.5 for pulse flow, respectively. The equation for respective hydrodynamic flow boundary was found by combining two of these. The predicted mass-transfer coefficients for liquid phase given by the simple equation for downward flow mode agree with the literature data in a wide range of gas and liquid flow rates.

28 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors measured the interfacial areas and liquid phase volumetric mass transfer coefficients from chemical absorption of oxygen into sulfite solution and from physical absorption of carbon dioxide into water, respectively, in the cases of one, two, three and seven strings of touching spheres, and in irrigated columns packed with spheres, Raschig rings and Berl saddles.
Abstract: Interfacial areas and liquid-phase volumetric mass-transfer coefficients were measured from chemical absorption of oxygen into sulfite solution and from physical absorption of carbon dioxide into water, respectively, in the cases of one, two, three and seven strings of touching spheres, and in irrigated columns packed with spheres, Raschig rings and Berl saddles. The columns having seven strings of touching spheres used both open and closed configurations of spheres. When the number of spheres per string is larger than 10 and the number of strings m is 3 and 7, the empirical equation of interfacial area at for sphere diameter dp is given in terms of liquid Reynolds number Ret(=4ρQl/mπdpμl) and the number of contact points of spheres per sphere q as follows: atdp=4.8q-1.1Ret(0.27q0.25)tThe equation obtained by replacing at by ap/(1-e) and Ret by Rep in the above equation is applicable to illustrate the data in irrigated columns packed with spheres, (1-e) in solid fraction, with an accuracy of ±20%. Suppose q=4.2 for Raschig rings and q=2.8 for Berl saddles, the predicted values agree with the experimental data. The Sherwood numbers are presented by the same relation for the cases of one, two, three and seven strings, where the number of touching spheres is larger than 10, as follows: Sht=k*ltdp/DA=7.1Re1/3tSc1/2The equation obtained by substituting k*lt by k*lp, 7.1 by 27φ(1-e) and Ret by Rep represents the data for columns with a packing of surface shape factor φ.

2 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Theoretical and phenomenological aspects of trickle-bed reactors as reported in a wide number of papers of the last 35 years have been reviewed in this article, where several engineering topics have been focused by trying a critical interpretation of the attained results.

169 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a phenomenological analysis has been developed to relate the wetting efficiency with operating conditions such as reactor pressure, gas and liquid flow rate, which can be expressed by the following correlation: ƞ CE = 1.104 REL 1/3 1 + [( ΔP Z )/p L g] Ga L 1/9

157 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the effect of high pressure on pressure drop and liquid holdup in the trickle flow regime was investigated using a phenomenological analysis based on annular two-phase flow in a slit.

123 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a two-dimensional hydrodynamic model of cocurrent gas-liquid downflow through packed-bed reactors operating in the trickle flow regime is developed on the basis of a mechanistic approach.

114 citations