scispace - formally typeset
K

Keith Rayner

Researcher at University of California, San Diego

Publications -  407
Citations -  58648

Keith Rayner is an academic researcher from University of California, San Diego. The author has contributed to research in topics: Reading (process) & Eye movement. The author has an hindex of 118, co-authored 406 publications receiving 55173 citations. Previous affiliations of Keith Rayner include University of California, Berkeley & University of California, Los Angeles.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.

TL;DR: The basic theme of the review is that eye movement data reflect moment-to-moment cognitive processes in the various tasks examined.
Journal ArticleDOI

Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search.

TL;DR: Research on the following topics is reviewed with respect to reading: (a) the perceptual span, (or span of effective vision), (b) preview benefit, (c) eye movement control, and (d) models of eye movements.
Journal ArticleDOI

Making and Correcting Errors during Sentence Comprehension: Eye Movements in the Analysis of Structurally Ambiguous Sentences

Lyn Frazier, +1 more
- 01 Apr 1982 - 
TL;DR: This paper found that shorter reading times for sentences conforming to certain independently motivated parsing strategies (late closure and minimal attachment) than for comparable sentences which violate these strategies, suggesting that the human sentence-parsing mechanism operates in a rather systematic fashion, immediately computing the structural consequences of fixated material for the analysis of preceding material.
Journal ArticleDOI

The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading.

TL;DR: In this paper, a computer-based eye-movement controlled display system was developed for the study of perceptual processes in reading, which was used to identify the region from which skilled readers pick up various types of visual information during a fixation while reading.
Journal ArticleDOI

Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

TL;DR: The results suggest that verb complexity does not affect lexical access time, and that word frequency and the presence of two highly likely meanings may affect lexicals access and/or postaccess integration.