Kenneth A. Jacobson

Bio: Kenneth A. Jacobson is an academic researcher from National Institutes of Health. The author has contributed to research in topics: Adenosine receptor & Adenosine. The author has an hindex of 98, co-authored 759 publications receiving 48834 citations. Previous affiliations of Kenneth A. Jacobson include Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences & Seoul National University.

International Union of Pharmacology. XXV. Nomenclature and Classification of Adenosine Receptors

Abstract: Four adenosine receptors have been cloned and characterized from several mammalian species. The receptors are named adenosine A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3). The A(2A) and A(2B) receptors preferably interact with members of the G(s) family of G proteins and the A(1) and A(3) receptors with G(i/o) proteins. However, other G protein interactions have also been described. Adenosine is the preferred endogenous agonist at all these receptors, but inosine can also activate the A(3) receptor. The levels of adenosine seen under basal conditions are sufficient to cause some activation of all the receptors, at least where they are abundantly expressed. Adenosine levels during, e.g., ischemia can activate all receptors even when expressed in low abundance. Accordingly, experiments with receptor antagonists and mice with targeted disruption of adenosine A(1), A(2A), and A(3) expression reveal roles for these receptors under physiological and particularly pathophysiological conditions. There are pharmacological tools that can be used to classify A(1), A(2A), and A(3) receptors but few drugs that interact selectively with A(2B) receptors. Testable models of the interaction of these drugs with their receptors have been generated by site-directed mutagenesis and homology-based modelling. Both agonists and antagonists are being developed as potential drugs.

Nomenclature and classification of purinoceptors

Abstract: “Receptors recognize a distinct chemical entity and translate information from that entity into a form that the cell can read to alter its state” (Kenakin et al., 1992). Even though the receptors are often pharmacologically defined on the basis of synthetic compounds, they are assumed to have developed to respond to endogenous molecules. Therefore, receptors are generally named on the basis of their natural ligands. Hence, it is appropriate to very briefly summarize the evidence that purine nucleotides and nucleosides are natural ligands for a wide class of receptors. In a seminal paper, Drury and Szent-Gyorgyi (1929) showed that adenosine exerted a large number of biological effects, including bradycardia and vasodilation. A wider interest in the role of adenosine followed from the demonstration in 1963 that adenosine can be produced by the hypoxic heart. Two groups independently formulated the hypothesis that adenosine may be involved in the metabolic regulation of coronary blood flow (Berne, 1963; Gerlach et al., 1963). The observation by de Gubareff and Sleator (1965) that the actions of adenosine in heart tissue could be blocked by caffeine suggested the existence of an adenosine receptor. The potent cardiovascular effects of adenosine led to an interest in the synthesis of new adenosine analogs, and careful dose-response studies with a number of these drugs (Cobbin et al., 1974) strongly suggested the presence of a receptor for adenosine-like compounds. Sattin and Rall (1970) reported that adenosine increased cyclic AMP accumulation in slices of rodent brain and that this adenosine-induced second-messenger response was blocked by methylxanthines. Their findings suggested that adenosine receptors exist in the central nervous system. The essentially simultaneous findings by Mcilwain (1972), that such brain slices actually elaborate adenosine in concentrations that would be sufficient to elevate cyclic AMP, provided support that these putative receptors were physiologically occupied by adenosine. Thus, in the 1970s there was good evidence that there were receptors for adenosine at which methylxanthines acted as antagonists. Biochemical evidence for the existence of multiple adenosine receptors was subsequently provided by the demonstration that adenosine analogs increased cyclic AMP production in some preparations and decreased it in others. Because the relative agonist potency for a variety of adenosine analogs was different for these two types of effects, the presence of two classes of receptors, called A1 and A2 (van Calker et al., 1979) or Ri and Ra (Londos et al., 1980), was proposed. The A1/A2 nomenclature is now generally used. The presence of receptors for ADP, particularly on blood platelets, was also recognized several decades ago. Studies of the factors in blood that induce platelet aggregation led to the identification of ADP as an active component present in red blood cell extracts (Gaarder et al., 1961). The evidence that ADP and adenosine (presumably A2) receptors exist on platelets was summarized by Haslam and Cusack (1981). Four decades ago, ATP was shown to produce important cardiovascular effects (Green and Stoner, 1950) and to be released from sensory nerves (Holton and Holton, 1954; Holton, 1959), hinting at a role in neural transmission. In his landmark review of purinergic nerves, Burnstock (1972) postulated the existence of specific ATP receptors. Although evidence in support of this idea was not overwhelming at the time, many subsequent studies have supported the existence of receptors for extracellular ATP (Burnstock and Brown, 1981; Gordon, 1986; O’Connor et al., 1991). Similarly, the evidence is now compelling that ATP plays important physiological and/ or pathophysiological roles in a variety of biological systems, including that of a neurotransmitter in peripheral and central neurons. Finally, diadenosinetetraphosphate is a dinucleotide stored in synaptic vesicles and chromaffin granules (Flodgaard and Klenow, 1982; Rodriguez del Castillo et al., 1988) and released therefrom (Pintor et al., 1991a, 1992). The purine dinucleotide also binds with subnanomolar affinity to receptors (Pintor et al., 1991b, 1993) and exerts biological effects (Pintor et al., 1993), indicating that it is an endogenous purinoceptor ligand. Thus, strong evidence for the presence of receptors for the endogenous ligands adenosine, ADP, ATP, and dia-denosinetetraphosphate had accumulated. This group of receptors is called the purinoceptors. If at some future time there is compelling evidence that UTP, or another pyrimidine nucleotide, is an endogenous ligand at receptors that respond poorly or not at all to ATP, then this terminology may need revision.

Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining of Tissue and Cell Sections

Abstract: INTRODUCTIONHematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stains have been used for at least a century and are still essential for recognizing various tissue types and the morphologic changes that form the basis of contemporary cancer diagnosis. The stain has been unchanged for many years because it works well with a variety of fixatives and displays a broad range of cytoplasmic, nuclear, and extracellular matrix features. Hematoxylin has a deep blue-purple color and stains nucleic acids by a complex, incompletely understood reaction. Eosin is pink and stains proteins nonspecifically. In a typical tissue, nuclei are stained blue, whereas the cytoplasm and extracellular matrix have varying degrees of pink staining. Well-fixed cells show considerable intranuclear detail. Nuclei show varying cell-type- and cancer-type-specific patterns of condensation of heterochromatin (hematoxylin staining) that are diagnostically very important. Nucleoli stain with eosin. If abundant polyribosomes are present, the cytoplasm will have a distinct blue cast. The Golgi zone can be tentatively identified by the absence of staining in a region next to the nucleus. Thus, the stain discloses abundant structural information, with specific functional implications. A limitation of hematoxylin staining is that it is incompatible with immunofluorescence. It is useful, however, to stain one serial paraffin section from a tissue in which immunofluorescence will be performed. Hematoxylin, generally without eosin, is useful as a counterstain for many immunohistochemical or hybridization procedures that use colorimetric substrates (such as alkaline phosphatase or peroxidase). This protocol describes H&E staining of tissue and cell sections.

Adenosine receptors as therapeutic targets

Abstract: Adenosine receptors are major targets of caffeine, the most commonly consumed drug in the world There is growing evidence that they could also be promising therapeutic targets in a wide range of conditions, including cerebral and cardiac ischaemic diseases, sleep disorders, immune and inflammatory disorders and cancer After more than three decades of medicinal chemistry research, a considerable number of selective agonists and antagonists of adenosine receptors have been discovered, and some have been clinically evaluated, although none has yet received regulatory approval However, recent advances in the understanding of the roles of the various adenosine receptor subtypes, and in the development of selective and potent ligands, as discussed in this review, have brought the goal of therapeutic application of adenosine receptor modulators considerably closer

International Union of Pharmacology LVIII: Update on the P2Y G Protein-Coupled Nucleotide Receptors: From Molecular Mechanisms and Pathophysiology to Therapy

Abstract: There have been many advances in our knowledge about different aspects of P2Y receptor signaling since the last review published by our International Union of Pharmacology subcommittee. More receptor subtypes have been cloned and characterized and most orphan receptors deorphanized, so that it is now possible to provide a basis for a future subdivision of P2Y receptor subtypes. More is known about the functional elements of the P2Y receptor molecules and the signaling pathways involved, including interactions with ion channels. There have been substantial developments in the design of selective agonists and antagonists to some of the P2Y receptor subtypes. There are new findings about the mechanisms underlying nucleotide release and ectoenzymatic nucleotide breakdown. Interactions between P2Y receptors and receptors to other signaling molecules have been explored as well as P2Y-mediated control of gene transcription. The distribution and roles of P2Y receptor subtypes in many different cell types are better understood and P2Y receptor-related compounds are being explored for therapeutic purposes. These and other advances are discussed in the present review.

Membrane lipids: where they are and how they behave.

Abstract: Throughout the biological world, a 30 A hydrophobic film typically delimits the environments that serve as the margin between life and death for individual cells. Biochemical and biophysical findings have provided a detailed model of the composition and structure of membranes, which includes levels of dynamic organization both across the lipid bilayer (lipid asymmetry) and in the lateral dimension (lipid domains) of membranes. How do cells apply anabolic and catabolic enzymes, translocases and transporters, plus the intrinsic physical phase behaviour of lipids and their interactions with membrane proteins, to create the unique compositions and multiple functionalities of their individual membranes?

Receptors for Purines and Pyrimidines

Abstract: ### A. Overview Extracellular purines (adenosine, ADP, and ATP) and pyrimidines (UDP and UTP) are important signaling molecules that mediate diverse biological effects via cell-surface receptors termed purine receptors. In this review particular emphasis is placed on the discrepancy between the

Lipid Rafts As a Membrane-Organizing Principle

Abstract: Cell membranes display a tremendous complexity of lipids and proteins designed to perform the functions cells require. To coordinate these functions, the membrane is able to laterally segregate its constituents. This capability is based on dynamic liquid-liquid immiscibility and underlies the raft concept of membrane subcompartmentalization. Lipid rafts are fluctuating nanoscale assemblies of sphingolipid, cholesterol, and proteins that can be stabilized to coalesce, forming platforms that function in membrane signaling and trafficking. Here we review the evidence for how this principle combines the potential for sphingolipid-cholesterol self-assembly with protein specificity to selectively focus membrane bioactivity.

Biological properties of extracellular vesicles and their physiological functions

Abstract: In the past decade, extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been recognized as potent vehicles of intercellular communication, both in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. This is due to their capacity to transfer proteins, lipids and nucleic acids, thereby influencing various physiological and pathological functions of both recipient and parent cells. While intensive investigation has targeted the role of EVs in different pathological processes, for example, in cancer and autoimmune diseases, the EV-mediated maintenance of homeostasis and the regulation of physiological functions have remained less explored. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current understanding of the physiological roles of EVs, which has been written by crowd-sourcing, drawing on the unique EV expertise of academia-based scientists, clinicians and industry based in 27 European countries, the United States and Australia. This review is intended to be of relevance to both researchers already working on EV biology and to newcomers who will encounter this universal cell biological system. Therefore, here we address the molecular contents and functions of EVs in various tissues and body fluids from cell systems to organs. We also review the physiological mechanisms of EVs in bacteria, lower eukaryotes and plants to highlight the functional uniformity of this emerging communication system.