Author
Kenneth R. McQuaid
Other affiliations: San Francisco VA Medical Center, University of California, Berkeley, University of California ...read more
Bio: Kenneth R. McQuaid is an academic researcher from University of California, San Francisco. The author has contributed to research in topics: Colonoscopy & Inflammatory bowel disease. The author has an hindex of 39, co-authored 111 publications receiving 7898 citations. Previous affiliations of Kenneth R. McQuaid include San Francisco VA Medical Center & University of California, Berkeley.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
Duke University1, Veterans Health Administration2, University of California, San Francisco3, University of Texas at Austin4, VCU Medical Center5, University of Chicago6, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey7, University of Texas Medical Branch8, California Pacific Medical Center9, University of California, San Diego10, New York University11
TL;DR: Colonoscopy was more sensitive than other tests, as currently undertaken, for detection of colonic polyps and cancers, and have important implications for diagnostic use of colon imaging tests.
621 citations
••
University of Kansas1, Veterans Health Administration2, Royal Adelaide Hospital3, Oregon Health & Science University4, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center5, Mayo Clinic6, University of California, San Francisco7, Cleveland Clinic8, Leicester Royal Infirmary9, Karolinska Institutet10, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center11, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill12, University of California, Los Angeles13
TL;DR: Based on this review of BE, the opinions of workshop members on issues pertaining to screening and surveillance are at variance with published clinical guidelines.
Abstract: Background & Aims: The diagnosis and management of Barrett's esophagus (BE) are controversial. We conducted a critical review of the literature in BE to provide guidance on clinically relevant issues. Methods: A multidisciplinary group of 18 participants evaluated the strength and the grade of evidence for 42 statements pertaining to the diagnosis, screening, surveillance, and treatment of BE. Each member anonymously voted to accept or reject statements based on the strength of evidence and his own expert opinion. Results: There was strong consensus on most statements for acceptance or rejection. Members rejected statements that screening for BE has been shown to improve mortality from adenocarcinoma or to be cost-effective. Contrary to published clinical guidelines, they did not feel that screening should be recommended for adults over age 50, regardless of age or duration of heartburn. Members were divided on whether surveillance prolongs survival, although the majority agreed that it detects curable neoplasia and can be cost-effective in selected patients. The majority did not feel that acid-reduction therapy reduces the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma but did agree that nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs are associated with a cancer risk reduction and are of promising (but unproven) value. Participants rejected the notion that mucosal ablation with acid suppression prevents adenocarcinoma in BE but agreed that this may be an appropriate strategy in a subgroup of patients with high-grade dysplasia. Conclusions: Based on this review of BE, the opinions of workshop members on issues pertaining to screening and surveillance are at variance with published clinical guidelines.
529 citations
••
TL;DR: CT colonography has excellent sensitivity for the detection of clinically important colorectal polyps and cancer.
Abstract: PURPOSE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of computed tomographic (CT) colonography for colorectal polyp and cancer detection by using colonoscopy as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred patients underwent CT colonography followed by standard colonoscopy. Bowel preparation consisted of magnesium citrate and polyethylene glycol. After colonic air insufflation, patients underwent scanning in the supine and prone positions with 3-mm collimation during a single breath hold. The transverse CT images, sagittal and coronal reformations, and three-dimensional endoluminal images were interpreted by two radiologists independently, and then a consensus reading was performed. CT colonographic findings were correlated with standard colonoscopic and histologic findings. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity and specificity of CT colonography for polyp detection were 90.1% (164 of 182) and 72.0% (85 of 118), respectively. By using direct polyp matching, the overall sensitivity was 69.7% (3...
497 citations
••
TL;DR: Screening colonoscopy can be performed in multiple centers with a high degree of success and safety in large numbers of asymptomatic, average-risk men.
447 citations
••
TL;DR: Moderate sedation provides a high level of physician and patient satisfaction and a low risk of serious adverse events with all currently available agents.
443 citations
Cited by
More filters
••
TL;DR: Novel aspects of the new definition include a patient-centered approach that is independent of endoscopic findings, subclassification of the disease into discrete syndrome, and the recognition of laryngitis, cough, asthma, and dental erosions as possible GERD syndromes.
3,328 citations
••
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center1, Oregon Health & Science University2, Mount Sinai St. Luke's and Mount Sinai Roosevelt3, American Cancer Society4, Veterans Health Administration5, Emory University6, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine7, University of Pennsylvania8, Eastern Virginia Medical School9, Mayo Clinic10, Kaiser Permanente11, University of Wisconsin-Madison12, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis13, Creighton University14, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center15
TL;DR: Clinicians should be prepared to offer patients a choice between a screening test that is effective at both early cancer detection and cancer prevention through the detection and removal of polyps and those that can detect cancer early and also can detect adenomatous polyps.
2,876 citations
••
TL;DR: The revised CONSORT statement is intended to improve the reporting of an RCT, enabling readers to understand a trial's conduct and to assess the validity of its results.
Abstract: To comprehend the results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), readers must understand its design, conduct, analysis and interpretation. That goal can only be achieved through complete transparency from authors. Despite several decades of educational efforts, the reporting of RCTs needs improvement. Investigators and editors developed the original CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement to help authors improve reporting by using a checklist and flow diagram. The revised CONSORT statement presented in this paper incorporates new evidence and addresses some criticisms of the original statement.
2,444 citations
••
TL;DR: Findings support the hypothesis that colonoscopic removal of adenomatous polyps prevents death from colorectal cancer.
Abstract: BACKGROUND In the National Polyp Study (NPS), colorectal cancer was prevented by colonoscopic removal of adenomatous polyps. We evaluated the long-term effect of colonoscopic polypectomy in a study on mortality from colorectal cancer. METHODS We included in this analysis all patients prospectively referred for initial colonoscopy (between 1980 and 1990) at NPS clinical centers who had polyps (adenomas and nonadenomas). The National Death Index was used to identify deaths and to determine the cause of death; follow-up time was as long as 23 years. Mortality from colorectal cancer among patients with adenomas removed was compared with the expected incidence-based mortality from colorectal cancer in the general population, as estimated from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program, and with the observed mortality from colorectal cancer among patients with nonadenomatous polyps (internal control group). RESULTS Among 2602 patients who had adenomas removed during participation in the study, after a median of 15.8 years, 1246 patients had died from any cause and 12 had died from colorectal cancer. Given an estimated 25.4 expected deaths from colorectal cancer in the general population, the standardized incidence-based mortality ratio was 0.47 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26 to 0.80) with colonoscopic polypectomy, suggesting a 53% reduction in mortality. Mortality from colorectal cancer was similar among patients with adenomas and those with nonadenomatous polyps during the first 10 years after polypectomy (relative risk, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.1 to 10.6). CONCLUSIONS These findings support the hypothesis that colonoscopic removal of adenomatous polyps prevents death from colorectal cancer. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others.)
2,381 citations
••
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center1, Harvard University2, Indiana University3, University of Minnesota4, University of Utah5, Boston University6, University of California, San Diego7, Kaiser Permanente8, Virginia Commonwealth University9, Eastern Virginia Medical School10, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center11, Mayo Clinic12
TL;DR: These guidelines differ from those published in 1997 in several ways: the screening interval for double contrast barium enema has been shortened to 5 years, and colonoscopy is the preferred test for the diagnostic investigation of patients with findings on screening and for screening patients with a family history of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.
2,196 citations