K
Kerry Ratigan
Researcher at Amherst College
Publications - 11
Citations - 114
Kerry Ratigan is an academic researcher from Amherst College. The author has contributed to research in topics: China & Social policy. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 8 publications receiving 65 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Disaggregating the Developing Welfare State: Provincial Social Policy Regimes in China
TL;DR: Li et al. as mentioned in this paper conducted a cluster analysis of provincial social policy spending data and found that provinces systematically diverge in their social policy priorities, while some provinces invest in education to develop human capital and promote economic growth, others emphasize poverty alleviation.
Journal ArticleDOI
Re-evaluating Political Trust: The Impact of Survey Nonresponse in Rural China
Kerry Ratigan,Leah Rabin +1 more
TL;DR: Wang et al. as discussed by the authors examined the association between nonresponse to politically sensitive questions and individual characteristics such as sex, level of education, Party membership and cosmopolitanism, finding that less privileged groups may be underrepresented in survey data generally.
Journal ArticleDOI
Attitudinal Feedback towards Sub-national Social Policy: A Comparison of Popular Support for Social Health Insurance in Urban China
TL;DR: Policy feedback theory posits that pre-existing policies shape citizens' policy preferences and attitudes as discussed by the authors, which may, in turn, either reinforce or undermine current policing policies and policies.
Journal ArticleDOI
Too little, but not too late? Health reform in rural China and the limits of experimentalism
TL;DR: It is suggested that, although recent reforms may have somewhat reduced the out-of-pocket cost of catastrophic illness, rural health systems continue to suffer from serious deficiencies.
Journal ArticleDOI
Attitudes toward welfare spending in urban China: Evidence from a survey in two provinces and social policy implications
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explain divergent levels of support for welfare spending in a non-western authoritarian state by self-interest and ideology, two major theoretical frameworks from cross-national research.