scispace - formally typeset
K

Kerry Ratigan

Researcher at Amherst College

Publications -  11
Citations -  114

Kerry Ratigan is an academic researcher from Amherst College. The author has contributed to research in topics: China & Social policy. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 8 publications receiving 65 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Disaggregating the Developing Welfare State: Provincial Social Policy Regimes in China

TL;DR: Li et al. as mentioned in this paper conducted a cluster analysis of provincial social policy spending data and found that provinces systematically diverge in their social policy priorities, while some provinces invest in education to develop human capital and promote economic growth, others emphasize poverty alleviation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Re-evaluating Political Trust: The Impact of Survey Nonresponse in Rural China

TL;DR: Wang et al. as discussed by the authors examined the association between nonresponse to politically sensitive questions and individual characteristics such as sex, level of education, Party membership and cosmopolitanism, finding that less privileged groups may be underrepresented in survey data generally.
Journal ArticleDOI

Attitudinal Feedback towards Sub-national Social Policy: A Comparison of Popular Support for Social Health Insurance in Urban China

TL;DR: Policy feedback theory posits that pre-existing policies shape citizens' policy preferences and attitudes as discussed by the authors, which may, in turn, either reinforce or undermine current policing policies and policies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Too little, but not too late? Health reform in rural China and the limits of experimentalism

TL;DR: It is suggested that, although recent reforms may have somewhat reduced the out-of-pocket cost of catastrophic illness, rural health systems continue to suffer from serious deficiencies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Attitudes toward welfare spending in urban China: Evidence from a survey in two provinces and social policy implications

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explain divergent levels of support for welfare spending in a non-western authoritarian state by self-interest and ideology, two major theoretical frameworks from cross-national research.