K
Khadija Alhumaid
Researcher at Zayed University
Publications - 22
Citations - 322
Khadija Alhumaid is an academic researcher from Zayed University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Technology acceptance model & Computer science. The author has an hindex of 4, co-authored 14 publications receiving 65 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The acceptance of social media video for knowledge acquisition, sharing and application: A com-parative study among YouTube users and TikTok Users’ for medical purposes
COVID-19 &Elearning: Perceptions &Attitudes Of Teachers Towards E-Learning Acceptancein The Developing Countries
TL;DR: In this article, a micro-level study was conducted to examine the teachers' perceptions regarding online learning as a substitute for formal education, which revealed a positive relationship between technology acceptance and eLearning during Covid-19 in Pakistan.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Continuous Intention to Use E-Learning, from Two Different Perspectives
TL;DR: In this article, an online survey was conducted, consisting of 30 teachers and 342 students in one of the universities in the United Arab Emirates, and the results showed that teachers and students' perceived technology self-efficacy (TSE), ease of use (PEOU), and usefulness (PU) are the main factors directly affecting the continuous intention to use technology.
Journal ArticleDOI
Examining the Factors Influencing the Mobile Learning Usage During COVID-19 Pandemic: An Integrated SEM-ANN Method
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the way in which the emotion of fear affects the technology adoption of students and teachers amid the COVID-19 pandemic, and found that perceived fear and expectation confirmation were significant factors in predicting intention to use mobile learning.
Journal ArticleDOI
Four Ways Technology Has Negatively Changed Education
TL;DR: The authors investigates the ways through which classroom technology, such as iPad, Internet connection, laptops and social media, impacts negatively on education and concludes that such technology could change education negatively through four paths: deteriorating students' competences of reading and writing, dehumanizing educational environments, distorting social interactions between teachers and students and isolating individuals when using technology.