Klaus Giersiepen

Bio: Klaus Giersiepen is an academic researcher from University of Bremen. The author has contributed to research in topics: Cancer & Pediatric gastroenterology. The author has an hindex of 10, co-authored 19 publications receiving 2966 citations.

European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Coeliac Disease

Abstract: Objective: Diagnostic criteria for coeliac disease (CD) from the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) were published in 1990. Since then, the autoantigen in CD, tissue transglutaminase, has been identified; the perception of CD has changed from that of a rather uncommon enteropathy to a common multiorgan disease strongly dependent on the haplotypes human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8; and CD-specific antibody tests have improved. Methods: A panel of 17 experts defined CD and developed new diagnostic criteria based on the Delphi process. Two groups of patients were defined with different diagnostic approaches to diagnose CD: children with symptoms suggestive of CD (group 1) and asymptomatic children at increased risk for CD (group 2). The 2004 National Institutes of Health/ Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality report and a systematic literature search on antibody tests for CD in paediatric patients covering the years 2004 to 2009 was the basis for the evidence-based recommendations on CD-specific antibody testing. Results: In group 1, the diagnosis of CD is based on symptoms, positive serology, and histology that is consistent with CD. If immunoglobulin A anti-tissue transglutaminase type 2 antibody titers are high (>10 times the upper limit of normal), then the option is to diagnose CD without duodenal biopsies by applying a strict protocol with further laboratory tests. In group 2, the diagnosis of CD is based on positive serology and histology. HLADQ2 and HLA-DQ8 testing is valuable because CD is unlikely if both haplotypes are negative. Conclusions: The aim of the new guidelines was to achieve a high diagnostic accuracy and to reduce the burden for patients and their families. The performance of these guidelines in clinical practice should be evaluated prospectively. (JPGN 2012;54: 136–160)

Accuracy of diagnostic antibody tests for coeliac disease in children: summary of an evidence report.

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to summarise the evidence from 2004 to September 2009 on the performance of laboratory-based serological and point of care (POC) tests for diagnosing coeliac disease (CD) in children using histology as reference standard. Patients and methods We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for studies reporting on children for tests based on IgA and IgG anti-gliadin (AGA), endomysial (EmA), anti-transglutaminase-2 (TG2), and anti-deamidated gliadin peptides (DGP) antibodies or POC tests. For inclusion, histological analysis of duodenal biopsies and sensitivity and specificity for index tests had to be reported. Data were pooled and summary measures calculated for sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios ("LR+", "LR-"), and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR). In case of elevated statistical heterogeneity, studies reaching 90% sensitivity or specificity were reported. Results A total of 2510 articles were reviewed; 16 entered meta-analysis, reporting on 3110 patients (1876 with CD, 1234 without CD). For IgA-EmA, sensitivity was ≥90% in 7/11 studies and pooled specificity 98.2%. For IgA-anti-TG2, 11/15 studies yielded sensitivities ≥90% and 13/15 specificities ≥90%. For IgA-DGP, sensitivity ranged between 80.7% and 95.1% (specificity 86.3%-93.1%); for IgG-DGP between 80.1% and 98.6% (specificity 86.0-96.9%). IgA-EmA had the highest pooled DOR (554) and LR+ (31.8) for a laboratory test, followed by IgA-anti-TG2, IgG-DGP, IgA-DGP and IgA-AGA. POC tests showed a pooled sensitivity of 96.4% for IgA-TG2 (specificity 97.7%). Conclusions IgA-EmA and IgA-anti-TG2 tests appear highly accurate to diagnose CD. IgG-anti-DGP tests may help in excluding CD. IgA-AGA and IgA-DGP tests show inferior accuracy. POC tests may achieve high accuracy in the hands of experienced readers, but IgA-anti-TG2/EmA were superior.

Krebs in Deutschland 2003-2004 Häufigkeiten und Trends

Abstract: Die Broschüre »Krebs in Deutschland« wird alle zwei Jahre als gemeinsame Publikation der Gesellschaft der epidemiologischen Krebsregister e. V. (GEKID) und des Robert KochInstituts (RKI) herausgegeben. Die vorliegende 6. Auflage erscheint mit neuem Design erstmalig in der Reihe der Berichte der Gesundheitsberichterstattung (GBE) des Bundes. Sie enthält Angaben zu den in Deutschland im Zeitraum von 1980 bis zum Jahr 2004 insgesamt aufgetretenen Krebsneuerkrankungen und zu ausgewählten Einzellokalisationen, die jeweils kurz und übersichtlich dargestellt werden (Erkrankungsund Sterberaten, Risikofaktoren, Trendverläufe, Überlebensaussichten). Die aktuellen Schätzungen des RKI basieren auf den Daten vollzählig erfassender epidemiologischer Krebsregister in Deutschland. Für das Jahr 2004 weist diese Schätzung insgesamt 436.500 Krebsneuerkrankungen aus (Männer 230.500, Frauen 206.000). Damit sind im Vergleich zur vorangegangenen Schätzung, die mit dem Jahr 2002 abschloss, im Jahr 2004 etwa 12.000 Krebsneuerkrankungen mehr aufgetreten. Bei Frauen blieb die Gesamtzahl dieser Erkrankungen gegenüber 2002 unverändert. Die zusätzlichen Erkrankungsfälle im Jahr 2004 sind überwiegend auf Erkrankungen der Männer an Prostatakrebs zurückzuführen, der mit etwa 58.500 Erkrankungsfällen die häufigste Krebserkrankung bei Männer darstellt. Bei den Frauen steht, wie in den vorangegangenen Schätzungen auch, der Brustkrebs mit etwa 57.000 Neuerkrankungen an erster Stelle. Im Jahr 2004 verstarben insgesamt 208.800 Personen in Deutschland an Krebs, im Jahr 2002 waren es noch 209.900. Die Überlebensaussichten mit Prostatakrebs und Brustkrebs haben sich so weit verbessert, dass die Zahl der Krebssterbefälle daran mittlerweile abnimmt. Im Jahr 2004 verstarben 11.200 Männer an Prostatakrebs und 17.600 Frauen an Brustkrebs. Das sind jeweils 200 Sterbefälle weniger als noch zwei Jahre zuvor. Angaben zu Krebs erkrankungen bei Kindern werden vom Kinderkrebsregister Mainz in einem eigenen Abschnitt der Broschüre dargestellt.

European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Coeliac Disease

Abstract: Objective: Diagnostic criteria for coeliac disease (CD) from the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) were published in 1990. Since then, the autoantigen in CD, tissue transglutaminase, has been identified; the perception of CD has changed from that of a rather uncommon enteropathy to a common multiorgan disease strongly dependent on the haplotypes human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8; and CD-specific antibody tests have improved. Methods: A panel of 17 experts defined CD and developed new diagnostic criteria based on the Delphi process. Two groups of patients were defined with different diagnostic approaches to diagnose CD: children with symptoms suggestive of CD (group 1) and asymptomatic children at increased risk for CD (group 2). The 2004 National Institutes of Health/ Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality report and a systematic literature search on antibody tests for CD in paediatric patients covering the years 2004 to 2009 was the basis for the evidence-based recommendations on CD-specific antibody testing. Results: In group 1, the diagnosis of CD is based on symptoms, positive serology, and histology that is consistent with CD. If immunoglobulin A anti-tissue transglutaminase type 2 antibody titers are high (>10 times the upper limit of normal), then the option is to diagnose CD without duodenal biopsies by applying a strict protocol with further laboratory tests. In group 2, the diagnosis of CD is based on positive serology and histology. HLADQ2 and HLA-DQ8 testing is valuable because CD is unlikely if both haplotypes are negative. Conclusions: The aim of the new guidelines was to achieve a high diagnostic accuracy and to reduce the burden for patients and their families. The performance of these guidelines in clinical practice should be evaluated prospectively. (JPGN 2012;54: 136–160)

Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) is gradually changing medical practice. With recent progress in digitized data acquisition, machine learning and computing infrastructure, AI applications are expanding into areas that were previously thought to be only the province of human experts. In this Review Article, we outline recent breakthroughs in AI technologies and their biomedical applications, identify the challenges for further progress in medical AI systems, and summarize the economic, legal and social implications of AI in healthcare.

ESPGHAN revised porto criteria for the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease in children and adolescents

Abstract: Background: The diagnosis of pediatric-onset inflammatory bowel disease (PIBD) can be challenging in choosing the most informative diagnostic tests and correctly classifying PIBD into its different subtypes. Recent advances in our understanding of the natural history and phenotype of PIBD, increasing availability of serological and fecal biomarkers, and the emergence of novel endoscopic and imaging technologies taken together have made the previous Porto criteria for the diagnosis of PIBD obsolete. Methods: We aimed to revise the original Porto criteria using an evidencebased approach and consensus process to yield specific practice recommendations for the diagnosis of PIBD. These revised criteria are based on the Paris classification of PIBD and the original Porto criteria while incorporating novel data, such as for serum and fecal biomarkers. A consensus of at least 80% of participants was achieved for all recommendations and the summary algorithm. Results: The revised criteria depart from existing criteria by defining 2 categories of ulcerative colitis (UC, typical and atypical); atypical phenotypes of UC should be treated as UC. A novel approach based on multiple criteria for diagnosing IBD-unclassified (IBD-U) is proposed. Specifically, these revised criteria recommend upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and ileocolonscopy for all suspected patients with PIBD, with small bowel imaging (unless typical UC after endoscopy and histology) by magnetic resonance enterography or wireless capsule endoscopy.