Klaus Strobel

Bio: Klaus Strobel is an academic researcher from University of Zurich. The author has contributed to research in topics: PET-CT & Bone scintigraphy. The author has an hindex of 37, co-authored 140 publications receiving 4191 citations. Previous affiliations of Klaus Strobel include Technische Universität München.

The EANM practice guidelines for bone scintigraphy

Abstract: Purpose The radionuclide bone scan is the cornerstone of skeletal nuclear medicine imaging. Bone scintigraphy is a highly sensitive diagnostic nuclear medicine imaging technique that uses a radiotracer to evaluate the distribution of active bone formation in the skeleton related to malignant and benign disease, as well as physiological processes.

Diagnostic performance of choline PET for detection of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands in hyperparathyroidism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Hyperparathyroidism (HPT) is a common endocrine disorder caused by hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands (HP). The correct detection and localization of HP is challenging but crucial, as it may guide surgical treatment, particularly in patients with primary HPT. There is a growing body of data regarding the role of radiolabelled choline positron emission tomography (PET) in this setting. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of this method in detecting HP in patients with HPT. This systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out according to PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive computer literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases for studies published through May 2018 was performed using the following search algorithm: (a) “choline” or “fluorocholine” or “F-choline” or “C-choline” or “FCH” or “CH” or “FECH” or “FMCH” and (b) “PET” or “positron emission tomography” and (c) “parathyroid” or “hyperparathyroidism”. The diagnostic performance of radiolabelled choline PET was expressed as sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) on a per-patient and per-lesion basis and as detection rate (DR) on a per-patient basis, with pooled proportion and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) obtained using a random-effects model. Eighteen studies were included in the systematic review. Fourteen articles (517 patients) were selected for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis provided the following results on a per-patient analysis analysis: sensitivity 95% (95% CI: 92–97%), PPV 97% (95% CI: 95–98%) and DR 91% (95% CI: 87–94%). On a per-lesion analysis, pooled sensitivity and PPV were 92% (95% CI: 88–96) and 92% (95% CI: 89–95%), respectively. No significant heterogeneity was found among the selected studies. Radiolabelled choline PET demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance in detecting HP in patients with HPT. Large multicentre studies and cost-effectiveness analyses are needed to better define the role of this imaging method in this setting.

Contrast-Enhanced 18F-FDG PET/CT: 1-Stop-Shop Imaging for Assessing the Resectability of Pancreatic Cancer

Abstract: Patients with pancreatic cancer continue to have a poor prognosis, with a 5-y survival rate of less than 5%. Surgery is the only treatment that offers a potential cure. Determining resectability is the principal goal of staging in pancreatic cancer patients. Our objective was to evaluate the value of combined contrast-enhanced 18F-FDG PET/CT in assessing the resectability of pancreatic cancer and to compare enhanced PET/CT with the performance of PET alone and unenhanced PET/CT. Methods: Fifty patients (25 women and 25 men; mean age, 64.3 y; range, 39–84 y) with biopsy-proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma underwent enhanced 18F-FDG PET/CT for the evaluation of resectability. Criteria for unresectability were distant metastases, peritoneal carcinomatosis, arterial infiltration, or invasion of neighboring organs other than the duodenum. The performance of enhanced PET/CT regarding resectability was compared with that of PET alone and unenhanced PET/CT. Histology, intraoperative findings, and follow-up CT with clinical investigations were used as the reference standard. Results: According to the reference standard, 27 patients had disease that was not resectable because of distant metastases (n = 17), peritoneal carcinomatosis (n = 5), or local infiltration (n = 5). In the assessment of resectability, PET alone had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 44%, accuracy of 70%, positive predictive value of 61%, and negative predictive value of 100%; unenhanced PET/CT had respective values of 100%, 56%, 76%, 66%, and 100%; and enhanced PET/CT, 96%, 82%, 88%, 82%, and 96%. In 5 patients, unresectability was missed by all imaging methods and was diagnosed intraoperatively. Enhanced PET/CT was significantly superior to PET alone (P = 0.035), and there was a trend for enhanced PET/CT to be superior to unenhanced PET/CT (P = 0.070). Conclusion: The use of enhanced PET/CT as a 1-stop-shop imaging protocol for assessing the resectability of pancreatic cancer is feasible and accurate. Enhanced PET/CT is significantly superior to PET alone.

Shop Imaging for Assessing the Resectability of Pancreatic Cancer

Abstract: Patients with pancreatic cancer continue to have a poor prognosis, with a 5-y survival rate of less than 5%. Surgery is the only treatment that offers a potential cure. Determining resectability is the principal goal of staging in pancreatic cancer patients. Our objective was to evaluate the value of combined contrastenhanced 18 F-FDG PET/CT in assessing the resectability of pancreatic cancer and to compare enhanced PET/CT with the performance of PET alone and unenhanced PET/CT. Methods: Fifty patients (25 women and 25 men; mean age, 64.3 y; range, 39–84 y) with biopsy-proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma underwent enhanced 18 F-FDG PET/CT for the evaluation of resectability. Criteria for unresectability were distant metastases, peritoneal carcinomatosis, arterial infiltration, or invasion of neighboring organs other than the duodenum. The performance of enhanced PET/CT regarding resectability was compared with that of PET alone and unenhanced PET/CT. Histology, intraoperative findings, and follow-up CT with clinical investigations were used as the reference standard. Results: According to the reference standard, 27 patients had disease that was not resectable because of distant metastases (n 5 17), peritoneal carcinomatosis (n 5 5), or local infiltration (n 5 5). In the assessment of resectability, PET alone had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 44%, accuracy of 70%, positive predictive value of 61%, and negative predictive value of 100%; unenhanced PET/CT had respective values of 100%, 56%, 76%, 66%, and 100%; and enhanced PET/CT, 96%, 82%, 88%, 82%, and 96%. In 5 patients, unresectability was missed by all imaging methods and was diagnosed intraoperatively. Enhanced PET/CT was significantly superior to PET alone (P 5 0.035), and there was a trend for enhanced PET/CT to be superior to unenhanced PET/CT (P 5 0.070). Conclusion: The use of enhanced PET/CT as a 1-stop-shop imaging protocol for assessing the resectability of pancreatic cancer is feasible and accurate. Enhanced PET/CT is significantly superior to PET alone.

Role of Imaging in the Staging and Response Assessment of Lymphoma: Consensus of the International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas Imaging Working Group

Abstract: PurposeRecent advances in imaging, use of prognostic indices, and molecular profiling techniques have the potential to improve disease characterization and outcomes in lymphoma. International trials are under way to test image-based response–adapted treatment guided by early interim positron emission tomography (PET) –computed tomography (CT). Progress in imaging is influencing trial design and affecting clinical practice. In particular, a five-point scale to grade response using PET-CT, which can be adapted to suit requirements for early- and late-response assessment with good interobserver agreement, is becoming widely used both in practice- and response-adapted trials. A workshop held at the 11th International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas (ICML) in 2011 concluded that revision to current staging and response criteria was timely.MethodsAn imaging working group composed of representatives from major international cooperative groups was asked to review the literature, share knowledge about research i...

Guidelines on Prostate Cancer

Abstract: The introduction of an effective blood test, prostate specific antigen (PSA), has made it possible to diagnose more and more men in an earlier stage where they can be offered potentially curative treatments. The other side of the coin is that if effective diagnostic procedures are used unselectively in elderly men with a short life expectancy, a problem with over diagnosis and over treatment might occur. Thus the same stage of prostate cancer may need different treatment strategies, pending on the patient’s life expectancy. This, and many other issues regarding the disease, is the subject of the EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. G UI DE LI N ES O N P RO ST AT E CA N CE R 10