Preface Introduction: Traditions of Nationhood in France and Germany I. The Institution of Citizenship 1. Citizenship as Social Closure 2. The French Revolution and the Invention of National Citizenship 3. State, State-System, and Citizenship in Germany II. Defining The Citizenry: The Bounds of Belonging 4. Citizenship and Naturalization in France and Germany 5. Migrants into Citizens: The Crystallization of Jus Soli in Late-Nineteenth-Century France 6. The Citizenry as Community of Descent: The Nationalization of Citizenship in Wilhelmine Germany 7. \"Etre Francais, Cela se Merite\": Immigration and the Politics of Citizenship in France in the 1980s 8. Continuities in the German Politics of Citizenship Conclusion Notes Bibliography Index

Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany.

This paper aims to clarify the meaning, and explain the utility, of the case study method, a method often practiced but little understood. A “case study,” I argue, is best defined as an intensive study of a single unit with an aim to generalize across a larger set of units. Case studies rely on the same sort of covariational evidence utilized in non-case study research. Thus, the case study method is correctly understood as a particular way of defining cases, not a way of analyzing cases or a way of modeling causal relations. I show that this understanding of the subject illuminates some of the persistent ambiguities of case study work, ambiguities that are, to some extent, intrinsic to the enterprise. The travails of the case study within the discipline of political science are also rooted in an insufficient appreciation of the methodological tradeoffs that this method calls forth. This paper presents the familiar contrast between case study and non-case study work as a series of characteristic strengths and weaknesses—affinities—rather than as antagonistic approaches to the empirical world. In the end, the perceived hostility between case study and non-case study research is largely unjustified and, perhaps, deserves to be regarded as a misconception. Indeed, the strongest conclusion to arise from this methodological examination concerns the complementarity of single-unit and cross-unit research designs.

/pdf/what-is-a-case-study-and-what-is-it-good-for-pr7nzakso7.pdf

What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good for

Culture and Imperialism

The state has always been difficult to define. Its boundary with society appears elusive, porous, and mobile. I argue that this elusiveness should not be overcome by sharper definitions, but explored as a clue to the state's nature. Analysis of the literature shows that neither rejecting the state in favor of such concepts as the political system, nor “bringing it back in,” has dealt with this boundary problem. The former approach founders on it, the latter avoids it by a narrow idealism that construes the state-society distinction as an external relation between subjective and objective entities. A third approach, presented here, can account for both the salience of the state and its elusiveness. Reanalyzing evidence presented by recent theorists, state-society boundaries are shown to be distinctions erected internally, as an aspect of more complex power relations. Their appearance can be historically traced to technical innovations of the modern social order, whereby methods of organization and control internal to the social processes they govern create the effect of a state structure external to those processes.

/pdf/the-limits-of-the-state-beyond-statist-approaches-and-their-3skztux41c.pdf

The Limits of the State: Beyond Statist Approaches and their Critics

Nothing inherent in the discipline steers planners either toward environmental protection or toward economic development—or toward a third goal of planning: social equity. Instead, planners work within the tension generated among these three fundamental aims, which, collectively, I call the “planner's triangle,” with sustainable development located at its center. This center cannot be reached directly, but only approximately and indirectly, through a sustained period of confronting and resolving the triangle's conflicts. To do so, planners have to redefine sustainability, since its current formulation romanticizes our sustainable past and is too vaguely holistic. Planners would benefit both from integrating social theory with environmental thinking and from combining their substantive skills with techniques for community conflict resolution, to confront economic and environmental injustice.

/pdf/green-cities-growing-cities-just-cities-urban-planning-and-1mzd2o29d4.pdf

Green Cities, Growing Cities, Just Cities?: Urban Planning and the Contradictions of Sustainable Development

States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China

Preface to the Second Edition. Preface to First Edition. 1 Rethinking Modernity. 2 The Revival of Post--Industrial Theory. 3 The Information Society. 4 Fordism and Post--Fordism. 5 Modernity and Post--Modernity (1): The Idea of the Modern. 6 Modernity and Post--Modernity (2): The Idea of Post--Modernity. 7 Millennial Themes: Endings and Beginnings. Notes. References. Index.

From Post-Industrial to Post-Modern Society: New Theories of the Contemporary World

Civil society has been on the lips of many theoricians of the 1989 revolutions, in the West as well as in East Central Europe. The hope is that civil society, as a concept and a programme, will help post-communist societies out of their current political predicament. How reasonable a hope is this ? How useful is the concept of civil society at the present time ; either in the East or the West ? This paper first considers the historical career of the concept. It then goes on to examine its fruitfulness in the current conditions of western and East European society.

Civil-Society - An Inquiry Into The Usefulness Of An Historical Term

The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Volume I. The Rise of the Network Society

Why is English national identity so enigmatic and so elusive? Why, unlike the Scots, Welsh, Irish and most of continental Europe, do the English find it so difficult to say who they are? The Making of English National Identity, first published in 2003, is a fascinating exploration of Englishness and what it means to be English. Drawing on historical, sociological and literary theory, Krishan Kumar examines the rise of English nationalism and issues of race and ethnicity from earliest times to the present day. He argues that the long history of the English as an imperial people has, as with other imperial people like the Russians and the Austrians, developed a sense of missionary nationalism which in the interests of unity and empire has necessitated the repression of ordinary expressions of nationalism. Professor Kumar's lively and provocative approach challenges readers to reconsider their pre-conceptions about national identity and who the English really are.

/pdf/the-making-of-english-national-identity-31yye8pr6t.pdf

Krishan Kumar

Papers

States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China

From Post-Industrial to Post-Modern Society: New Theories of the Contemporary World

Civil-Society - An Inquiry Into The Usefulness Of An Historical Term

The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Volume I. The Rise of the Network Society

The making of English national identity