scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Kristin Shrader Frechette

Bio: Kristin Shrader Frechette is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Harm & Representativeness heuristic. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 1 publications receiving 2 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
07 Sep 2015
TL;DR: Assessing the ACES-versus-WHO scientific debate about diesel exhaust concludes that because ACES fails to fully assess the worst NTDE-2007 harm and typical exposures to typical subjects, therefore it draws no valid conclusions aboutNTDE- 2007 harm.
Abstract: In 2015 authors of four joint US-government and auto-and-oil-industry studies, ACES, claimed to have done the first comprehensive evaluation of lifetime exposure to new-technology-diesel exhaust (NTDE-2007), so-called “clean diesel” required by US emissions standards for year-2007 and later heavy-duty trucks. ACES claimed to have found no evidence that NTDE-2007 causes lung cancer. However, since at least 2012, the World Health Organization (WHO), International Agency for Research on Cancer, American Public Health Association, and many other scientists say any diesel exhaust, especially diesel particulate matter, causes lung-cancer, cardiovascular, and neurological problems. Who is right about diesel exhaust, ACES or WHO? This question is important both because the US and other governments cite ACES research in their diesel-exhaust standard-setting, and because the auto and oil industries use ACES conclusions to claim new diesel exhaust is virtually harmless. This article (1) begins the task of assessing the ACES-versus-WHO scientific debate. It (2) argues that the ACES research is fatally flawed because it neither studies what it claims nor does so in an unbiased way. Instead the article (3) shows that ACES research (3.1) relies on state-variable biases (in focusing mainly on NO2 and mass, not also on DPM and particle size/ number), and (3.2) exhibits representativeness errors (in using only the healthiest animals, too-small sample sizes, and non-lifetime exposures). Despite some ACES strengths, the article (4) concludes that because ACES fails to fully assess the worst NTDE-2007 harm and typical exposures to typical subjects, therefore it draws no valid conclusions about NTDE-2007 harm.

2 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Neurotoxicite and sante publique : un livre phare phare a mettre entre toutes les mains !
Abstract: ers.2013.0669 Auteur(s) : Denis Zmirou-Navier denis.zmirou@inserm.fr Philippe Grandjean Oxford University Press, 2013 Environmental Ethics and Science Policy Series 232 p. ISBN 978-0-19-998538-8 $26,96 Neurotoxicite et sante publique : un livre phare Voici un livre a mettre entre toutes les mains ! Du moins dans celles des citoyens qui se sentent concernes par le potentiel qu’ont un grand nombre de substances chimiques, naturelles ou industrielles, d’affecter la tres complexe [...]

23 citations