Kumaravel Somasundaram

Bio: Kumaravel Somasundaram is an academic researcher from Indian Institute of Science. The author has contributed to research in topics: Glioma & Cell cycle. The author has an hindex of 46, co-authored 128 publications receiving 11744 citations. Previous affiliations of Kumaravel Somasundaram include Northwestern University & University of Pennsylvania.

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

Abstract: In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. For example, a key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process versus those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process including the amount and rate of cargo sequestered and degraded). In particular, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation must be differentiated from stimuli that increase autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. It is worth emphasizing here that lysosomal digestion is a stage of autophagy and evaluating its competence is a crucial part of the evaluation of autophagic flux, or complete autophagy. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. Along these lines, because of the potential for pleiotropic effects due to blocking autophagy through genetic manipulation, it is imperative to target by gene knockout or RNA interference more than one autophagy-related protein. In addition, some individual Atg proteins, or groups of proteins, are involved in other cellular pathways implying that not all Atg proteins can be used as a specific marker for an autophagic process. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.

Arrest of the cell cycle by the tumour-suppressor BRCA1 requires the cdk-inhibitor p21waf1/cip1

Abstract: Much of the predisposition to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer has been attributed to inherited defects in the BRCA1 tumour-suppressor gene. The nuclear protein BRCA1 has the properties of a transcription factor, and can interact with the recombination and repair protein RAD51. Young women with germline alterations in BRCA1 develop breast cancer at rates 100-fold higher than the general population, and BRCA1-null mice die before day 8 of development. However, the mechanisms of BRCA1-mediated growth regulation and tumour suppression remain unknown. Here we show that BRCA1 transactivates expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21WAF1/CIP1 in a p53-independent manner, and that BRCA1 inhibits cell-cycle progression into the S-phase following its transfection into human cancer cells. BRCA1 does not inhibit S-phase progression in p21-/- cells, unlike p21+/+ cells, and tumour-associated, transactivation-deficient mutants of BRCA1 are defective in both transactivation of p21 and cell-cycle inhibition. These data suggest that one mechanism by which BRCA1 contributes to cell-cycle arrest and growth suppression is through the induction of p21.

BRCA1 physically associates with p53 and stimulates its transcriptional activity

Abstract: Mutations of the BRCA1 tumor suppressor gene are the most commonly detected alterations in familial breast and ovarian cancer. Although BRCA1 is required for normal mouse development, the molecular basis for its tumor suppressive function remains poorly understood. We show here that BRCA1 increases p53-dependent transcription from the p21WAF1/CIP1 and bax promoters. We also show that BRCA1 and p53 proteins interact both in vitro and in vivo. The interacting regions map, in vitro, to aa 224-500 of BRCA1 and the C-terminal domain of p53. Tumor-derived transactivation-deficient BRCA1 mutants are defective in co-activation of p53-dependent transcription and a truncation mutant of BRCA1 that retains the p53-interacting region acts as a dominant inhibitor of p53-dependent transcription. BRCA1 and p53 cooperatively induce apoptosis of cancer cells. The results indicate that BRCA1 and p53 may coordinately regulate gene expression in their role as tumor suppressors.

Essential role of METTL3-mediated m(6)A modification in glioma stem-like cells maintenance and radioresistance

Abstract: Despite advances in biology and therapeutic modalities, existence of highly tumorigenic glioma stem-like cells (GSCs) makes glioblastomas (GBMs) invincible. N6-methyl adenosine (m6A), one of the abundant mRNA modifications catalyzed by methyltransferase-like 3 and 14 (METTL3/14), influences various events in RNA metabolism. Here, we report the crucial role of METTL3-mediated m6A modification in GSC (neurosphere) maintenance and dedifferentiation of glioma cells. METTL3 expression is elevated in GSC and attenuated during differentiation. RNA immunoprecipitation studies identified SOX2 as a bonafide m6A target of METTL3 and the m6A modification of SOX2 mRNA by METTL3 enhanced its stability. The exogenous overexpression of 3'UTR-less SOX2 significantly alleviated the inhibition of neurosphere formation observed in METTL3 silenced GSCs. METTL3 binding and m6A modification in vivo required intact three METTL3/m6A sites present in the SOX2-3'UTR. Further, we found that the recruitment of Human antigen R (HuR) to m6A-modified RNA is essential for SOX2 mRNA stabilization by METTL3. In addition, we found a preferential binding by HuR to the m6A-modified transcripts globally. METTL3 silenced GSCs showed enhanced sensitivity to γ-irradiation and reduced DNA repair as evidenced from the accumulation of γ-H2AX. Exogenous overexpression of 3'UTR-less SOX2 in METTL3 silenced GSCs showed efficient DNA repair and also resulted in the significant rescue of neurosphere formation from METTL3 silencing induced radiosensitivity. Silencing METTL3 inhibited RasV12 mediated transformation of mouse immortalized astrocytes. GBM tumors have elevated levels of METTL3 transcripts and silencing METTL3 in U87/TIC inhibited tumor growth in an intracranial orthotopic mouse model with prolonged mice survival. METTL3 transcript levels predicted poor survival in GBMs which are enriched for GSC-specific signature. Thus our study reports the importance of m6A modification in GSCs and uncovers METTL3 as a potential molecular target in GBM therapy.

AP2 inhibits cancer cell growth and activates p21WAF1/CIP1 expression.

Abstract: The 52-kD Activator Protein (AP2) is a DNA-binding transcription factor implicated in signalling terminal differentiation. Profound developmental abnormalities have been recently observed in AP2-null mice. The molecular events by which AP2 promotes differentiation or development are, however, unknown. Increased expression of the universal cell cycle inhibitor p21WAF1/CIP1 occurs in growth-arrested terminally differentiating cells. In a search for cellular factors that could activate p21 during phorbol ester (TPA)-induced differentiation, we identified AP2 as a regulator of p21 expression. Mutagenesis of an AP2 DNA-binding site within a p21 promoter-luciferase reporter inhibited its activation by either AP2 transfection or TPA stimulation. Endogenous p21 protein levels were elevated and DNA synthesis was inhibited in AP2 versus control vector-transfected cells. Overexpression of AP2 in HepG2 human hepatoblastoma and SW480 human colon adenocarcinoma cells inhibited cell division and stable colony formation. These results link the differentiation-associated factor AP2 to negative cell cycle and growth control, possibly through p21 activation.

I and i

Abstract: There is, I think, something ethereal about i —the square root of minus one. I remember first hearing about it at school. It seemed an odd beast at that time—an intruder hovering on the edge of reality. Usually familiarity dulls this sense of the bizarre, but in the case of i it was the reverse: over the years the sense of its surreal nature intensified. It seemed that it was impossible to write mathematics that described the real world in …

CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression

Abstract: Mitogen-dependent progression through the first gap phase (G1) and initiation of DNA synthesis (S phase) during the mammalian cell division cycle are cooperatively regulated by several classes of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) whose activities are in turn constrained by CDK inhibitors (CKIs). CKIs that govern these events have been assigned to one of two families based on their structures and CDK targets. The first class includes the INK4 proteins (inhibitors of CDK4), so named for their ability to specifically inhibit the catalytic subunits of CDK4 and CDK6. Four such proteins [p16 (Serrano et al. 1993), p15 (Hannon and Beach 1994), p18 (Guan et al. 1994; Hirai et al. 1995), and p19 (Chan et al. 1995; Hirai et al. 1995)] are composed of multiple ankyrin repeats and bind only to CDK4 and CDK6 but not to other CDKs or to D-type cyclins. The INK4 proteins can be contrasted with more broadly acting inhibitors of the Cip/Kip family whose actions affect the activities of cyclin D-, E-, and A-dependent kinases. The latter class includes p21 (Gu et al. 1993; Harper et al. 1993; El-Deiry et al. 1993; Xiong et al. 1993a; Dulic et al. 1994; Noda et al. 1994), p27 (Polyak et al. 1994a,b; Toyoshima and Hunter 1994), and p57 (Lee et al. 1995; Matsuoka et al. 1995), all of which contain characteristic motifs within their amino-terminal moieties that enable them to bind both to cyclin and CDK subunits (Chen et al. 1995, 1996; Nakanishi et al. 1995; Warbrick et al. 1995; Lin et al. 1996; Russo et al. 1996). Based largely on in vitro experiments and in vivo overexpression studies, CKIs of the Cip/Kip family were initially thought to interfere with the activities of cyclin D-, E-, and A-dependent kinases. More recent work has altered this view and revealed that although the Cip/Kip proteins are potent inhibitors of cyclin Eand A-dependent CDK2, they act as positive regulators of cyclin Ddependent kinases. This challenges previous assumptions about how the G1/S transition of the mammalian cell cycle is governed, helps explain some enigmatic features of cell cycle control that also involve the functions of the retinoblastoma protein (Rb) and the INK4 proteins, and changes our thinking about how either p16 loss or overexpression of cyclin D-dependent kinases contribute to cancer. Here we focus on the biochemical interactions that occur between CKIs and cyclin Dand E-dependent kinases in cultured mammalian cells, emphasizing the manner by which different positive and negative regulators of the cell division cycle cooperate to govern the G1-to-S transition. To gain a more comprehensive understanding of the biology of CDK inhibitors, readers are encouraged to refer to a rapidly emerging but already extensive literature (for review, see Elledge and Harper 1994; Sherr and Roberts 1995; Chellappan et al. 1998; Hengst and Reed 1998a; Kiyokawa and Koff 1998; Nakayama 1998; Ruas and Peters 1998).

Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018.

Abstract: Over the past decade, the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death (NCCD) has formulated guidelines for the definition and interpretation of cell death from morphological, biochemical, and functional perspectives. Since the field continues to expand and novel mechanisms that orchestrate multiple cell death pathways are unveiled, we propose an updated classification of cell death subroutines focusing on mechanistic and essential (as opposed to correlative and dispensable) aspects of the process. As we provide molecularly oriented definitions of terms including intrinsic apoptosis, extrinsic apoptosis, mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT)-driven necrosis, necroptosis, ferroptosis, pyroptosis, parthanatos, entotic cell death, NETotic cell death, lysosome-dependent cell death, autophagy-dependent cell death, immunogenic cell death, cellular senescence, and mitotic catastrophe, we discuss the utility of neologisms that refer to highly specialized instances of these processes. The mission of the NCCD is to provide a widely accepted nomenclature on cell death in support of the continued development of the field.

Consensus coding sequences of human breast and colorectal cancers

Abstract: Analysis of 13,023 genes in 11 breast and 11 colorectal cancers revealed that individual tumors accumulate an average of ˜90 mutant genes but that only a subset of these contribute to the neoplastic process. Using stringent criteria to delineate this subset, we identified 189 genes (average of 11 per tumor) that were mutated at significant frequency. The vast majority of these genes were not known to be genetically altered in tumors and are predicted to affect a wide range of cellular functions, including transcription, adhesion, and invasion. These data define the genetic landscape of two human cancer types, provide new targets for diagnostic and therapeutic intervention and monitoring.

The somatic genomic landscape of glioblastoma

Abstract: We describe the landscape of somatic genomic alterations based on multidimensional and comprehensive characterization of more than 500 glioblastoma tumors (GBMs). We identify several novel mutated genes as well as complex rearrangements of signature receptors, including EGFR and PDGFRA. TERT promoter mutations are shown to correlate with elevated mRNA expression, supporting a role in telomerase reactivation. Correlative analyses confirm that the survival advantage of the proneural subtype is conferred by the G-CIMP phenotype, and MGMT DNA methylation may be a predictive biomarker for treatment response only in classical subtype GBM. Integrative analysis of genomic and proteomic profiles challenges the notion of therapeutic inhibition of a pathway as an alternative to inhibition of the target itself. These data will facilitate the discovery of therapeutic and diagnostic target candidates, the validation of research and clinical observations and the generation of unanticipated hypotheses that can advance our molecular understanding of this lethal cancer.