Laëtitia Lethielleux

Bio: Laëtitia Lethielleux is an academic researcher from University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne. The author has contributed to research in topics: Intermediary & Public good. The author has an hindex of 3, co-authored 15 publications receiving 62 citations.

Providing Public Goods and Commons. Towards Coproduction and New Forms of Governance for a Revival of Public Action [Offrir des biens publics et des communs. Vers la coproduction et de nouvelles formes de gouvernance pour la revitalisation de l'action publique]

Abstract: In this chapter we illustrate how the public sector might fail in narrowing spatial inequalities, and how both underdeveloped markets and urgent territorial needs create in peripheral areas robust individual incentives to turn into non-profit activities or even household production. In all those situations, a well-developed non-profit sector can offer marginalized or excluded social groups a legal and ethical opportunity to obtain a decent income by offering rewards (monetary or nonmonetary) in exchange for volunteering, allowing households to afford the cost of living. Laying on the results of the analysis, we discuss four cases of successful cooperation among SSE institutions by one side, and the private and the public sector on the other. In all those cases, the private and the public sector decided to facilitate the development of the non-profit sector by contracting out part of the production process to reduce costs and achieve a higher level of effectiveness. The result was successful because the non-profit sector did not incur in the opportunistic behaviors that might affect profit-oriented activities. Therefore, we suggest how local inter-institutional cooperation among the SSE, the private and the public sector should become the norm rather than the exception, in order to achieve at the same time a higher level of equitable and sustainable development and well-being.

Comment prédire et expliquer l'échec des changements organisationnels

Abstract: Que ce soit dans une operation de croissance interne, de changement structurel ou technologique, comment interpreter les phenomenes d’echec rencontres dans l’introduction de changements organisationnels? Dans une premiere partie, a partir d’une recherche menee sur une operation de rachat d’un grand groupe de presse par un groupe industriel francais en juillet 2004, les auteurs identifient des indicateurs de mesure annonciateurs de l’echec d’une operation de croissance externe: la confiance en l’avenir, le degre d’implication et les logiques de survivance developpees Dans une deuxieme partie, a partir de cas d’entreprises francaises, ils analysent les echecs rencontres dans la mise en place de nouvelles structures ou de nouveaux outils Et dans une derniere partie les causes de ces echecs

Groupement d’employeurs et gestion des défaillances des TPE/PME : le syndrome de l’arroseur arrosé

Abstract: Cet article analyse pour la premiere fois le role des groupements d’employeurs (GE) dans la gestion des defaillances des TPE/PME. Le partenariat mis en place entre les GE et les TPE/PME permet de donner une souplesse de fonctionnement aux entreprises en difficulte. L’Etat francais semble partager cette vision dans la mesure ou il envisage de sensibiliser les tribunaux de commerce, les administrateurs et les mandataires judiciaires a la solution du GE pour une entreprise en difficulte. Sans campagnes de promotion pour les faire connaitre aupres des TPE et PME, cette mesure ne produira pas les effets escomptes.

Réseaux et nouvelles configurations RH territoriales : le rôle des groupements d’employeurs

Abstract: Le role des groupements d’employeurs (GE) reste largement sous-estime dans le deploiement de nouvelles configurations RH sur les territoires. Il serait victime d’une forme de paradoxe liee a une invisibilite institutionnelle. Pour sortir de cette impasse, il ressort d’une recherche-action, menee de 2015 a 2017 aupres de 23 GE, que la structuration en reseau apporte des perspectives encourageantes, sous reserve de prendre en compte la question de la perennite de ce reseau.

The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (Chinese Translation)

Abstract: What makes organizations so similar? We contend that the engine of rationalization and bureaucratization has moved from the competitive marketplace to the state and the professions. Once a set of organizations emerges as a field, a paradox arises: rational actors make their organizations increasingly similar as they try to change them. We describe three isomorphic processes-coercive, mimetic, and normative—leading to this outcome. We then specify hypotheses about the impact of resource centralization and dependency, goal ambiguity and technical uncertainty, and professionalization and structuration on isomorphic change. Finally, we suggest implications for theories of organizations and social change.

Review of 'Understanding knowledge as a commons. From theory to practice.' edited by Charlotte Hess and Elinor Ostrom

Abstract: Review of 'Understanding knowledge as a commons. From theory to practice.' edited by Charlotte Hess and Elinor Ostrom

Burn-out: Stages of Disillusionment in the Helping Professions

Abstract: Bargaining with reading habit is no need. Reading is not kind of something sold that you can take or not. It is a thing that will change your life to life better. It is the thing that will give you many things around the world and this universe, in the real world and here after. As what will be given by this burn out stages of disillusionment in the helping professions, how can you bargain with the thing that has many benefits for you?