scispace - formally typeset
L

Lara Varpio

Researcher at Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences

Publications -  142
Citations -  5729

Lara Varpio is an academic researcher from Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Scholarship. The author has an hindex of 27, co-authored 122 publications receiving 3039 citations. Previous affiliations of Lara Varpio include University of Ottawa.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131.

TL;DR: Thematic analysis is outlined, positioning it in relation to other methods of qualitative analysis, and described when it is appropriate to use the method under a variety of epistemological frameworks, as this term is often misapplied.
Journal ArticleDOI

How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others.

TL;DR: This article aims to explain phenomenology by reviewing the key philosophical and methodological differences between two of the major approaches to phenomenology: transcendental and hermeneutic and demonstrates how it can be applied to HPE research.
Journal ArticleDOI

Shedding the cobra effect: problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking.

TL;DR: Some HPE scholars have begun to use terms in qualitative publications without critically reflecting on: (i) their ontological and epistemological roots; (ii) their definitions, or (iii) their implications.
Journal ArticleDOI

Current trends in interprofessional education of health sciences students: a literature review.

TL;DR: Although most studies reported outcomes in student learning about professional roles, team communication and general satisfaction with IPE activities, a review identified inconsistencies and shortcomings in howIPE activities are conceptualized, implemented, assessed and reported.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Use of the Delphi and Other Consensus Group Methods in Medical Education Research: A Review.

TL;DR: Consensus methods are poorly standardized and inconsistently used in medical education research and improved criteria for reporting are needed.