scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Laura Senovilla

Bio: Laura Senovilla is an academic researcher from University of Paris. The author has contributed to research in topics: Cancer cell & Immunogenic cell death. The author has an hindex of 49, co-authored 98 publications receiving 10005 citations. Previous affiliations of Laura Senovilla include Institut Gustave Roussy & Institut Universitaire de France.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
12 Apr 2012-Oncogene
TL;DR: A systematic discussion of the mechanisms that account for the cisplatin-resistant phenotype of tumor cells are described and the development of chemosensitization strategies constitute a goal with important clinical implications.
Abstract: Platinum-based drugs, and in particular cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (best known as cisplatin), are employed for the treatment of a wide array of solid malignancies, including testicular, ovarian, head and neck, colorectal, bladder and lung cancers. Cisplatin exerts anticancer effects via multiple mechanisms, yet its most prominent (and best understood) mode of action involves the generation of DNA lesions followed by the activation of the DNA damage response and the induction of mitochondrial apoptosis. Despite a consistent rate of initial responses, cisplatin treatment often results in the development of chemoresistance, leading to therapeutic failure. An intense research has been conducted during the past 30 years and several mechanisms that account for the cisplatin-resistant phenotype of tumor cells have been described. Here, we provide a systematic discussion of these mechanism by classifying them in alterations (1) that involve steps preceding the binding of cisplatin to DNA (pre-target resistance), (2) that directly relate to DNA-cisplatin adducts (on-target resistance), (3) concerning the lethal signaling pathway(s) elicited by cisplatin-mediated DNA damage (post-target resistance) and (4) affecting molecular circuitries that do not present obvious links with cisplatin-elicited signals (off-target resistance). As in some clinical settings cisplatin constitutes the major therapeutic option, the development of chemosensitization strategies constitute a goal with important clinical implications.

2,026 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Oliver Kepp1, Laura Senovilla1, Ilio Vitale, Erika Vacchelli1, Sandy Adjemian2, Patrizia Agostinis3, Lionel Apetoh4, Fernando Aranda1, Vincenzo Barnaba5, Norma Bloy1, Laura Bracci6, Karine Breckpot7, David Brough8, Aitziber Buqué1, Maria G. Castro9, Mara Cirone5, María Isabel Colombo10, Isabelle Cremer11, Sandra Demaria12, Luciana Dini13, Aristides G. Eliopoulos14, Alberto Faggioni5, Silvia C. Formenti12, Jitka Fucikova15, Lucia Gabriele6, Udo S. Gaipl16, Jérôme Galon11, Abhishek D. Garg3, François Ghiringhelli4, Nathalia A. Giese17, Zong Sheng Guo18, Akseli Hemminki19, Martin Herrmann16, James W. Hodge20, Stefan Holdenrieder21, Jamie Honeychurch8, Hong-Min Hu22, Xing Huang1, Timothy M Illidge8, Koji Kono23, Mladen Korbelik, Dmitri V. Krysko24, Sherene Loi, Pedro R. Lowenstein9, Enrico Lugli25, Yuting Ma1, Frank Madeo26, Angelo A. Manfredi, Isabelle Martins27, Domenico Mavilio25, Laurie Menger28, Nicolò Merendino29, Michael Michaud1, Grégoire Mignot, Karen L. Mossman30, Gabriele Multhoff31, Rudolf Oehler32, Fabio Palombo5, Theocharis Panaretakis33, Jonathan Pol1, Enrico Proietti6, Jean-Ehrland Ricci34, Chiara Riganti35, Patrizia Rovere-Querini, Anna Rubartelli, Antonella Sistigu, Mark J. Smyth36, Juergen Sonnemann, Radek Spisek15, John Stagg37, Abdul Qader Sukkurwala38, Eric Tartour39, Andrew Thorburn40, Stephen H. Thorne18, Peter Vandenabeele24, Francesca Velotti29, Samuel T Workenhe30, Haining Yang41, Wei-Xing Zong42, Laurence Zitvogel1, Guido Kroemer43, Lorenzo Galluzzi43 
TL;DR: Strategies conceived to detect surrogate markers of ICD in vitro and to screen large chemical libraries for putative I CD inducers are outlined, based on a high-content, high-throughput platform that was recently developed.
Abstract: Apoptotic cells have long been considered as intrinsically tolerogenic or unable to elicit immune responses specific for dead cell-associated antigens. However, multiple stimuli can trigger a functionally peculiar type of apoptotic demise that does not go unnoticed by the adaptive arm of the immune system, which we named "immunogenic cell death" (ICD). ICD is preceded or accompanied by the emission of a series of immunostimulatory damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) in a precise spatiotemporal configuration. Several anticancer agents that have been successfully employed in the clinic for decades, including various chemotherapeutics and radiotherapy, can elicit ICD. Moreover, defects in the components that underlie the capacity of the immune system to perceive cell death as immunogenic negatively influence disease outcome among cancer patients treated with ICD inducers. Thus, ICD has profound clinical and therapeutic implications. Unfortunately, the gold-standard approach to detect ICD relies on vaccination experiments involving immunocompetent murine models and syngeneic cancer cells, an approach that is incompatible with large screening campaigns. Here, we outline strategies conceived to detect surrogate markers of ICD in vitro and to screen large chemical libraries for putative ICD inducers, based on a high-content, high-throughput platform that we recently developed. Such a platform allows for the detection of multiple DAMPs, like cell surface-exposed calreticulin, extracellular ATP and high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), and/or the processes that underlie their emission, such as endoplasmic reticulum stress, autophagy and necrotic plasma membrane permeabilization. We surmise that this technology will facilitate the development of next-generation anticancer regimens, which kill malignant cells and simultaneously convert them into a cancer-specific therapeutic vaccine.

665 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The molecular and cellular circuitries whereby cytotoxic agents can activate the immune system against cancer, and their therapeutic implications, are discussed.
Abstract: A crucial role of the immune system in cancer progression and response to therapy has recently emerged. Here, Galluzzi and colleagues discuss the immune parameters that may predict the therapeutic response of patients to chemotherapeutics, and review the mechanisms by which current antineoplastic agents activate the immune system against cancer.

591 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is shown that nutrient starvation causes rapid depletion of AcCoA, and multiple distinct manipulations designed to increase or reduce cytosolic Ac CoA led to the suppression or induction of autophagy, respectively, both in cultured human cells and in mice, delineating Ac coenzyme A-centered pharmacological strategies that allow for the therapeutic manipulation ofautophagy.

397 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
06 Jun 2013-Cell
TL;DR: Nine tentative hallmarks that represent common denominators of aging in different organisms are enumerated, with special emphasis on mammalian aging, to identify pharmaceutical targets to improve human health during aging, with minimal side effects.

9,980 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Daniel J. Klionsky1, Kotb Abdelmohsen2, Akihisa Abe3, Joynal Abedin4  +2519 moreInstitutions (695)
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macro-autophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes.
Abstract: In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. For example, a key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process versus those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process including the amount and rate of cargo sequestered and degraded). In particular, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation must be differentiated from stimuli that increase autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. It is worth emphasizing here that lysosomal digestion is a stage of autophagy and evaluating its competence is a crucial part of the evaluation of autophagic flux, or complete autophagy. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. Along these lines, because of the potential for pleiotropic effects due to blocking autophagy through genetic manipulation, it is imperative to target by gene knockout or RNA interference more than one autophagy-related protein. In addition, some individual Atg proteins, or groups of proteins, are involved in other cellular pathways implying that not all Atg proteins can be used as a specific marker for an autophagic process. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.

5,187 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This review will discuss the activation and function of NF-κB in association with inflammatory diseases and highlight the development of therapeutic strategies based on NF-σB inhibition.
Abstract: The transcription factor NF-κB regulates multiple aspects of innate and adaptive immune functions and serves as a pivotal mediator of inflammatory responses. NF-κB induces the expression of various pro-inflammatory genes, including those encoding cytokines and chemokines, and also participates in inflammasome regulation. In addition, NF-κB plays a critical role in regulating the survival, activation and differentiation of innate immune cells and inflammatory T cells. Consequently, deregulated NF-κB activation contributes to the pathogenic processes of various inflammatory diseases. In this review, we will discuss the activation and function of NF-κB in association with inflammatory diseases and highlight the development of therapeutic strategies based on NF-κB inhibition.

4,110 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Lorenzo Galluzzi1, Lorenzo Galluzzi2, Ilio Vitale3, Stuart A. Aaronson4  +183 moreInstitutions (111)
TL;DR: The Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death (NCCD) has formulated guidelines for the definition and interpretation of cell death from morphological, biochemical, and functional perspectives.
Abstract: Over the past decade, the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death (NCCD) has formulated guidelines for the definition and interpretation of cell death from morphological, biochemical, and functional perspectives. Since the field continues to expand and novel mechanisms that orchestrate multiple cell death pathways are unveiled, we propose an updated classification of cell death subroutines focusing on mechanistic and essential (as opposed to correlative and dispensable) aspects of the process. As we provide molecularly oriented definitions of terms including intrinsic apoptosis, extrinsic apoptosis, mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT)-driven necrosis, necroptosis, ferroptosis, pyroptosis, parthanatos, entotic cell death, NETotic cell death, lysosome-dependent cell death, autophagy-dependent cell death, immunogenic cell death, cellular senescence, and mitotic catastrophe, we discuss the utility of neologisms that refer to highly specialized instances of these processes. The mission of the NCCD is to provide a widely accepted nomenclature on cell death in support of the continued development of the field.

3,301 citations