Showing papers by "Lee A. Green published in 1997"

The Physician's Role in Minimizing Prehospital Delay in Patients at High Risk for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Recommendations from the National Heart Attack Alert Program

Abstract: Physicians and other health care professionals play an important role in reducing the delay to treatment in patients who have an evolving acute myocardial infarction. A multidisciplinary working group has been convened by the National Heart Attack Alert Program (which is coordinated by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health) to address this concern. The working group's recommendations target specific groups of patients: those who are known to have coronary heart disease, atherosclerotic disease of the aorta or peripheral arteries, or cerebrovascular disease. The risk for acute myocardial infarction or death in such patients is five to seven times greater than that in the general population. The working group recommends that these high-risk patients be clearly informed about symptoms that they might have during a coronary occlusion, steps that they should take, the importance of contacting emergency medical services, the need to report to an appropriate facility quickly, treatment options that are available if they present early, and rewards of early treatment in terms of improved quality of life. These instructions should be reviewed frequently and reinforced with appropriate written material, and patients should be encouraged to have a plan and to rehearse it periodically. Because of the important role of the bystander in increasing or decreasing delay to treatment, family members and significant others should be included in all instruction. Finally, physicians' offices and clinics should devise systems to quickly assess patients who telephone or present with symptoms of a possible acute myocardial infarction.

What alters physicians' decisions to admit to the coronary care unit?

Abstract: BACKGROUND A trial of a decision-support tool to modify utilization of the coronary care unit (CCU) failed because utilization improved after explanation of the tool but before its actual employment in the trial. We investigated this unexpected phenomenon in light of an emerging theory of decision-making under uncertainty. METHODS A prospective trial of the decision-support intervention was performed on the Family Practice service at a 100-bed rural hospital. Cards with probability charts from the acute ischemic Heart Disease Predictive Instrument (HDPI) were distributed to residents on the service and withdrawn on alternate weeks. Residents were encouraged to consult the probability charts when making CCU placement decisions. The study decision was between placement in the CCU and in a monitored nursing bed. Analyses included all patients admitted during the intervention trial year for suspected acute cardiac ischemia (n = 89), plus patients admitted in two pretrial periods (n = 108 and 50) and one posttrial period (n = 45). RESULTS In the intervention trial, HDPI use did not affect CCU utilization (odds ratio 1.046, P > .5). However, following the description of the instrument at a departmental clinical conference, CCU use markedly declined at least 6 months before the intervention trial (odds ratio 0.165, P < .001). Simply in learning about the instrument. residents achieved sensitivity and specificity equal to the instrument's optimum, whether or not they actually used it. CONCLUSIONS Physicians introduced to a decision-support tool achieved optimal CCU utilization without actually performing probability estimations. This may have resulted from improved focus on relevant clinical factors identified by the tool. Teaching simple decision-making strategies might effectively reduce unnecessary CCU utilization.