scispace - formally typeset
L

Lena Chua Booth

Researcher at Arizona State University

Publications -  13
Citations -  308

Lena Chua Booth is an academic researcher from Arizona State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Initial public offering & Closed-end fund. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 13 publications receiving 296 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Loan Collateral Decisions and Corporate Borrowing Costs

TL;DR: This paper examined the relation between borrowing costs and the presence of loan collateral and found that borrowing costs increase with default risk, consistent with low quality borrowers reducing their risks and borrowing costs through the use of collateral.
Journal ArticleDOI

Is presidential cycle in security returns merely a reflection of business conditions

TL;DR: The authors found that stock returns are significantly higher in the last 2 years than in the first 2 years of the presidential term. But the presidential cycle effect was not observed in the case of small-cap stock returns.
Posted Content

Economic factors, monetary policy and expected returns on stocks and bonds

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the impact of monetary policy on security returns and found that a restrictive monetary policy stance decreases returns of large and small stock portfolios and in some cases, corporate bond portfolios.
Posted Content

Underwriter Reputation and Aftermarket Performance of Closed-End Funds

TL;DR: In this paper, a positive relation between underwriter reputation and the initial and long-run aftermarket performance of closed-end funds was found, and this relation persists even after controlling for fund characteristics, types, and investment strategies.

Choice of Underwriters in Initial Public Offerings

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine whether the choice of underwriters is consistent with issuing firms trying to minimize underpricing, or to reap other potential associated benefits, and they find firms choosing high-ranked underwriters incur lower under pricing and those choosing low-ranked Underwriters incur higher under pricing.