Leonie S. Young

Bio: Leonie S. Young is an academic researcher from Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. The author has contributed to research in topics: Breast cancer & Cancer. The author has an hindex of 31, co-authored 91 publications receiving 2948 citations. Previous affiliations of Leonie S. Young include Mater Misericordiae Hospital & University College Dublin.

Critical research gaps and translational priorities for the successful prevention and treatment of breast cancer.

Abstract: Introduction: Breast cancer remains a significant scientific, clinical and societal challenge. This gap analysis has reviewed and critically assessed enduring issues and new challenges emerging from recent research, and proposes strategies for translating solutions into practice. Methods: More than 100 internationally recognised specialist breast cancer scientists, clinicians and healthcare professionals collaborated to address nine thematic areas: genetics, epigenetics and epidemiology; molecular pathology and cell biology; hormonal influences and endocrine therapy; imaging, detection and screening; current/ novel therapies and biomarkers; drug resistance; metastasis, angiogenesis, circulating tumour cells, cancer ‘stem’ cells; risk and prevention; living with and managing breast cancer and its treatment. The groups developed summary papers through an iterative process which, following further appraisal from experts and patients, were melded into this summary account. (Continued on next page)

The AIB1 oncogene promotes breast cancer metastasis by activation of PEA3-mediated matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2) and MMP9 expression.

Abstract: Amplified-in-breast cancer 1 (AIB1) is an overexpressed transcriptional coactivator in breast cancer. Although overproduced AIB1 is oncogenic, its role and underlying mechanisms in metastasis remain unclear. Here, mammary tumorigenesis and lung metastasis were investigated in wild-type (WT) and AIB1(-/-) mice harboring the mouse mammary tumor virus-polyomavirus middle T (PyMT) transgene. All WT/PyMT mice developed massive lung metastasis, but AIB1(-/-)/PyMT mice with comparable mammary tumors had significantly less lung metastasis. The recipient mice with transplanted AIB1(-/-)/PyMT tumors also had much less lung metastasis than the recipient mice with transplanted WT/PyMT tumors. WT/PyMT tumor cells expressed mesenchymal markers such as vimentin and N-cadherin, migrated and invaded rapidly, and formed disorganized cellular masses in three-dimensional cultures. In contrast, AIB1(-/-)/PyMT tumor cells maintained epithelial markers such as E-cadherin and ZO-1, migrated and invaded slowly, and still formed polarized acinar structures in three-dimensional cultures. Molecular analyses revealed that AIB1 served as a PEA3 coactivator and formed complexes with PEA3 on matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2) and MMP9 promoters to enhance their expression in both mouse and human breast cancer cells. In 560 human breast tumors, AIB1 expression was found to be positively associated with PEA3, MMP2, and MMP9. These findings suggest a new alternative strategy for controlling the deleterious roles of these MMPs in breast cancer by inhibiting their upstream coregulator AIB1.

Intrinsic Subtype Switching and Acquired ERBB2/HER2 Amplifications and Mutations in Breast Cancer Brain Metastases.

Abstract: Importance Patients with breast cancer (BrCa) brain metastases (BrM) have limited therapeutic options. A better understanding of molecular alterations acquired in BrM could identify clinically actionable metastatic dependencies. Objective To determine whether there are intrinsic subtype differences between primary tumors and matched BrM and to uncover BrM-acquired alterations that are clinically actionable. Design, Setting, and Participants In total, 20 cases of primary breast cancer tissue and resected BrM (10 estrogen receptor [ER]-negative and 10 ER-positive) from 2 academic institutions were included. Eligible cases in the discovery cohort harbored patient-matched primary breast cancer tissue and resected BrM. Given the rarity of patient-matched samples, no exclusion criteria were enacted. Two validation sequencing cohorts were used—a published data set of 17 patient-matched cases of BrM and a cohort of 7884 BrCa tumors enriched for metastatic samples. Main Outcomes and Measures Brain metastases expression changes in 127 genes within BrCa signatures, PAM50 assignments, and ERBB2 / HER2 DNA-level gains. Results Overall, 17 of 20 BrM retained the PAM50 subtype of the primary BrCa. Despite this concordance, 17 of 20 BrM harbored expression changes ( 2-fold) in clinically actionable genes including gains of FGFR4 (n = 6 [30%]), FLT1 (n = 4 [20%]), AURKA (n = 2 [10%]) and loss of ESR1 expression (n = 9 [45%]). The most recurrent expression gain was ERBB2 / HER2, which showed a greater than 2-fold expression increase in 7 of 20 BrM (35%). Three of these 7 cases were ERBB2/HER2-negative out of 13 ERBB2/HER2-negative in the primary BrCa cohort and became immunohistochemical positive (3+) in the paired BrM with metastasis-specific amplification of the ERBB2 / HER2 locus. In an independent data set, 2 of 9 (22.2%) ERBB2/HER2-negative BrCa switched to ERBB2/HER2-positive with 1 BrM acquiring ERBB2 / HER2 amplification and the other showing metastatic enrichment of the activating V777L ERBB2 / HER2 mutation. An expanded cohort revealed that ERBB2 / HER2 amplification and/or mutation frequency was unchanged between local disease and metastases across all sites; however, a significant enrichment was appreciated for BrM (13% local vs 24% BrM; P Conclusions and Relevance Breast cancer BrM commonly acquire alterations in clinically actionable genes, with metastasis-acquired ERBB2 / HER2 alterations in approximately 20% of ERBB2/HER2-negative cases. These observations have immediate clinical implications for patients with ERBB2/HER2–negative breast cancer and support comprehensive profiling of metastases to inform clinical care.

Expression of SRC-1, AIB1, and PEA3 in HER2 mediated endocrine resistant breast cancer; a predictive role for SRC-1.

Abstract: Background: In human breast cancer, the growth factor receptor HER2 is associated with disease progression and resistance to endocrine treatment. Growth factor induced mitogen activated protein kinase activity can phosphorylate not only the oestrogen receptor, but also its coactivator proteins AIB1 and SRC-1. Aim: To determine whether insensitivity to endocrine treatment in HER2 positive patients is associated with enhanced expression of coactivator proteins, expression of the HER2 transcriptional regulator, PEA3, and coregulatory proteins, AIB1 and SRC-1, was assessed in a cohort of patients with breast cancer of known HER2 status. Methods: PEA3, AIB1, and SRC-1 protein expression in 70 primary breast tumours of known HER2 status (HER2 positive, n = 35) and six reduction mammoplasties was assessed using immunohistochemistry. Colocalisation of PEA3 with AIB1 and SRC-1 was determined using immunofluorescence. Expression of PEA3, AIB1, and SRC-1 was correlated with clinicopathological parameters. Results: In primary breast tumours expression of PEA3, AIB1, and SRC-1 was associated with HER2 status (p = 0.0486, p = 0.0444, and p = 0.0012, respectively). In the HER2 positive population, PEA3 expression was associated with SRC-1 (p = 0.0354), and both PEA3 and SRC-1 were significantly associated with recurrence on univariate analysis (p = 0.0345; p Conclusion: Patients with high expression of HER2 in combination with SRC-1 have a greater probability of recurrence on endocrine treatment compared with those who are HER2 positive but SRC-1 negative. SRC-1 may be an important predictive indicator and therapeutic target in breast cancer.

Associations and interactions between Ets-1 and Ets-2 and coregulatory proteins, SRC-1, AIB1, and NCoR in breast cancer.

Abstract: Purpose : Associations between p160 coactivator proteins and the development of resistance to endocrine treatment have been described. We hypothesized that nuclear receptor coregulatory proteins may interact with nonsteroid receptors. We investigated the mitogen-activated protein kinase–activated transcription factors, Ets, as possible interaction proteins for the coactivators SRC-1 and AIB1 and the corepressor NCoR in human breast cancer. Experimental Design : Expression and coexpression of Ets and the coregulatory proteins was investigated using immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence in a cohort of breast tumor patients ( N = 134). Protein expression, protein-DNA interactions and protein-protein interactions were assessed using Western blot, electromobility shift, and coimmunoprecipitation analysis, respectively. Results: Ets-1 and Ets-2 associated with reduced disease-free survival ( P P P P n = 28). In primary breast tumor cell cultures and in the SKBR3 breast cell line, growth factors induced interaction between Ets and their DNA response element, induced recruitment of coactivators to the transcription factor-DNA complex, and up-regulated protein expression of HER2. Ets-1 and Ets-2 interacted with the coregulators under basal conditions, and growth factors up-regulated Ets-2 interaction with SRC-1 and AIB1. Coexpression of Ets-2 and SRC-1 significantly associated with the rate of recurrence and HER expression, compared with patients who expressed Ets-2 but not SRC-1 ( P P Conclusions: These data describe associations and interactions between nonsteroid transcription factors and coregulatory proteins in human breast cancer.

Nitric Oxide and Peroxynitrite in Health and Disease

Abstract: The discovery that mammalian cells have the ability to synthesize the free radical nitric oxide (NO) has stimulated an extraordinary impetus for scientific research in all the fields of biology and medicine. Since its early description as an endothelial-derived relaxing factor, NO has emerged as a fundamental signaling device regulating virtually every critical cellular function, as well as a potent mediator of cellular damage in a wide range of conditions. Recent evidence indicates that most of the cytotoxicity attributed to NO is rather due to peroxynitrite, produced from the diffusion-controlled reaction between NO and another free radical, the superoxide anion. Peroxynitrite interacts with lipids, DNA, and proteins via direct oxidative reactions or via indirect, radical-mediated mechanisms. These reactions trigger cellular responses ranging from subtle modulations of cell signaling to overwhelming oxidative injury, committing cells to necrosis or apoptosis. In vivo, peroxynitrite generation represents a crucial pathogenic mechanism in conditions such as stroke, myocardial infarction, chronic heart failure, diabetes, circulatory shock, chronic inflammatory diseases, cancer, and neurodegenerative disorders. Hence, novel pharmacological strategies aimed at removing peroxynitrite might represent powerful therapeutic tools in the future. Evidence supporting these novel roles of NO and peroxynitrite is presented in detail in this review.

Integrative Genomics Viewer

Abstract: Rapid improvements in sequencing and array-based platforms are resulting in a flood of diverse genome-wide data, including data from exome and whole-genome sequencing, epigenetic surveys, expression profiling of coding and noncoding RNAs, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and copy number profiling, and functional assays. Analysis of these large, diverse data sets holds the promise of a more comprehensive understanding of the genome and its relation to human disease. Experienced and knowledgeable human review is an essential component of this process, complementing computational approaches. This calls for efficient and intuitive visualization tools able to scale to very large data sets and to flexibly integrate multiple data types, including clinical data. However, the sheer volume and scope of data pose a significant challenge to the development of such tools.

Estrogen Receptors: How Do They Signal and What Are Their Targets

Abstract: During the past decade there has been a substantial advance in our understanding of estrogen signaling both from a clinical as well as a preclinical perspective. Estrogen signaling is a balance bet...

Novel mechanisms of glucocorticoid resistance in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Abstract: 2458 Despite dramatic improvements in treatment over the past 40 years, acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remains one of the most common causes of death from disease in childhood. Glucocorticoids are among the most effective agents used in the treatment of lymphoid malignancies, and patient response to treatment is an important determinant of long-term outcome in childhood ALL. In spite of its clinical significance, the molecular basis of glucocorticoid resistance is still poorly understood. The aim of this study was to develop an experimental model system to define clinically relevant mechanisms of glucocorticoid resistance in childhood ALL. An in vivo model of childhood ALL has been developed in our laboratory, using patient biopsies established as xenografts in immune-deficient nonobese diabetic severe-combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID) mice. This model is highly representative of the human disease (Lock et al., Blood, 99: 4100-4108, 2002). The in vivo responses of these xenografts to the glucocorticoid dexamethasone (DEX) correlated significantly with patient outcome (p 1 μM) in xenografts from six patients, five of whom died of their disease. In contrast, four DEX-sensitive xenografts (IC50 values 2-fold in sensitive xenografts within 8 hours of treatment. In contrast, Bim induction was dramatically attenuated in DEX-resistant xenografts. These results have identified a clinically significant and novel mechanism of glucocorticoid resistance in childhood ALL, which occurs downstream of receptor-ligand interactions, but upstream of the signalling pathway resulting in Bim induction and apoptosis.

The Tumor Microenvironment Innately Modulates Cancer Progression

Abstract: Cancer development and progression occurs in concert with alterations in the surrounding stroma. Cancer cells can functionally sculpt their microenvironment through the secretion of various cytokines, chemokines, and other factors. This results in a reprogramming of the surrounding cells, enabling them to play a determinative role in tumor survival and progression. Immune cells are important constituents of the tumor stroma and critically take part in this process. Growing evidence suggests that the innate immune cells (macrophages, neutrophils, dendritic cells, innate lymphoid cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and natural killer cells) as well as adaptive immune cells (T cells and B cells) contribute to tumor progression when present in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Cross-talk between cancer cells and the proximal immune cells ultimately results in an environment that fosters tumor growth and metastasis. Understanding the nature of this dialog will allow for improved therapeutics that simultaneously target multiple components of the TME, increasing the likelihood of favorable patient outcomes.