Lisa J. Zimmerman

Bio: Lisa J. Zimmerman is an academic researcher from Buck Institute for Research on Aging. The author has contributed to research in topics: Proteome & Peptide spectral library. The author has an hindex of 3, co-authored 3 publications receiving 944 citations.

IDPicker 2.0: Improved protein assembly with high discrimination peptide identification filtering.

Abstract: Tandem mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics has become a widespread technology for analyzing complex protein mixtures A number of database searching algorithms have been developed to assign peptide sequences to tandem mass spectra Assembling the peptide identifications to proteins, however, is a challenging issue because many peptides are shared among multiple proteins IDPicker is an open-source protein assembly tool that derives a minimum protein list from peptide identifications filtered to a specified False Discovery Rate Here, we update IDPicker to increase confident peptide identifications by combining multiple scores produced by database search tools By segregating peptide identifications for thresholding using both the precursor charge state and the number of tryptic termini, IDPicker retrieves more peptides for protein assembly The new version is more robust against false positive proteins, especially in searches using multispecies databases, by requiring additional novel peptides in t

Integrated Proteogenomic Characterization of Human High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer

Abstract: To provide a detailed analysis of the molecular com-ponents and underlying mechanisms associatedwith ovarian cancer, we performed a comprehensivemass-spectrometry-based proteomic characteriza-tion of 174 ovarian tumors previously analyzed byThe Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), of which 169were high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs). Inte-grating our proteomic measurements with thegenomic data yielded a number of insights into dis-ease, such as how different copy-number alterna-tionsinfluencetheproteome,theproteinsassociatedwith chromosomal instability, the sets of signalingpathways that diverse genome rearrangementsconverge on, and the ones most associated withshort overall survival. Specific protein acetylationsassociated with homologous recombination defi-ciency suggest a potential means for stratifying pa-tients for therapy. In addition to providing a valuableresource,thesefindingsprovideaviewofhowtheso-maticgenomedrivesthecancerproteomeandasso-ciations between protein and post-translationalmodification levels and clinical outcomes in HGSC.

ProteomeXchange provides globally coordinated proteomics data submission and dissemination

Abstract: 5. Tools available and ways to submit data to PX ............................................................. 11 5.1. MS/MS data submissions to PRIDE .................................................................................... 11 5.1.1. Creation of supported files for “Complete” submissions .................................................. 11 5.1.1.1. PRIDE XML .................................................................................................................................. 11 5.1.1.2. mzIdentML ................................................................................................................................. 13 5.1.2. Checking the files before submission (initial quality assessment) ..................................... 14 5.1.3. File submission to PRIDE: the PX submission tool ............................................................. 15 5.1.3.1. General Information ................................................................................................................... 15 5.1.3.2. Functionality, Design and Implementation Details .................................................................... 15 5.1.3.3. New open source libraries made available with PX submission tool ......................................... 18 5.1.3.4. PX Submission Tool Java Web Start ............................................................................................ 18 5.1.4. File submission to PRIDE: Command line support using Aspera ........................................ 19 5.1.5. Examples of Partial submissions to PRIDE ......................................................................... 19 5.2. SRM data submissions via PASSEL ..................................................................................... 20

LinkedOmics: analyzing multi-omics data within and across 32 cancer types.

Abstract: The LinkedOmics database contains multi-omics data and clinical data for 32 cancer types and a total of 11 158 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project. It is also the first multi-omics database that integrates mass spectrometry (MS)-based global proteomics data generated by the Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) on selected TCGA tumor samples. In total, LinkedOmics has more than a billion data points. To allow comprehensive analysis of these data, we developed three analysis modules in the LinkedOmics web application. The LinkFinder module allows flexible exploration of associations between a molecular or clinical attribute of interest and all other attributes, providing the opportunity to analyze and visualize associations between billions of attribute pairs for each cancer cohort. The LinkCompare module enables easy comparison of the associations identified by LinkFinder, which is particularly useful in multi-omics and pan-cancer analyses. The LinkInterpreter module transforms identified associations into biological understanding through pathway and network analysis. Using five case studies, we demonstrate that LinkedOmics provides a unique platform for biologists and clinicians to access, analyze and compare cancer multi-omics data within and across tumor types. LinkedOmics is freely available at http://www.linkedomics.org.

Protein Analysis by Shotgun/Bottom-up Proteomics

Abstract: According to Genome Sequencing Project statistics (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/static/gpstat.html), as of Feb 16, 2012, complete gene sequences have become available for 2816 viruses, 1117 prokaryotes, and 36 eukaryotes.1–2 The availability of full genome sequences has greatly facilitated biological research in many fields, and has greatly contributed to the growth of proteomics. Proteins are important because they are the direct bio-functional molecules in the living organisms. The term “proteomics” was coined from merging “protein” and “genomics” in the 1990s.3–4 As a post-genomic discipline, proteomics encompasses efforts to identify and quantify all the proteins of a proteome, including expression, cellular localization, interactions, post-translational modifications (PTMs), and turnover as a function of time, space and cell type, thus making the full investigation of a proteome more challenging than sequencing a genome. There are possibly 100,000 protein forms encoded by the approximate 20,235 genes of the human genome,5 and determining the explicit function of each form will be a challenge. The progress of proteomics has been driven by the development of new technologies for peptide/protein separation, mass spectrometry analysis, isotope labeling for quantification, and bioinformatics data analysis. Mass spectrometry has emerged as a core tool for large-scale protein analysis. In the past decade, there has been a rapid advance in the resolution, mass accuracy, sensitivity and scan rate of mass spectrometers used to analyze proteins. In addition, hybrid mass analyzers have been introduced recently (e.g. Linear Ion Trap-Orbitrap series6–7) which have significantly improved proteomic analysis. “Bottom-up” protein analysis refers to the characterization of proteins by analysis of peptides released from the protein through proteolysis. When bottom-up is performed on a mixture of proteins it is called shotgun proteomics,8–10 a name coined by the Yates lab because of its analogy to shotgun genomic sequencing.11 Shotgun proteomics provides an indirect measurement of proteins through peptides derived from proteolytic digestion of intact proteins. In a typical shotgun proteomics experiment, the peptide mixture is fractionated and subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis. Peptide identification is achieved by comparing the tandem mass spectra derived from peptide fragmentation with theoretical tandem mass spectra generated from in silico digestion of a protein database. Protein inference is accomplished by assigning peptide sequences to proteins. Because peptides can be either uniquely assigned to a single protein or shared by more than one protein, the identified proteins may be further scored and grouped based on their peptides. In contrast, another strategy, termed ‘top-down’ proteomics, is used to characterize intact proteins (Figure 1). The top-down approach has some potential advantages for PTM and protein isoform determination and has achieved notable success. Intact proteins have been measured up to 200 kDa,12 and a large scale study has identified more than 1,000 proteins by multi-dimensional separations from complex samples.13 However, the top-down method has significant limitations compared with shotgun proteomics due to difficulties with protein fractionation, protein ionization and fragmentation in the gas phase. By relying on the analysis of peptides, which are more easily fractionated, ionized and fragmented, shotgun proteomics can be more universally adopted for protein analysis. In fact, a hybrid of bottom-up and top-down methodologies and instrumentation has been introduced as middle-down proteomics.14 Essentially, middle-down proteomics analyzes larger peptide fragments than bottom-up proteomics, minimizing peptide redundancy between proteins. Additionally the large peptide fragments yield similar advantages as top-down proteomics, such as gaining further insight into post-translational modifications, without the analytical challenges of analyzing intact proteins. Shotgun proteomics has become a workhorse for the analysis of proteins and their modifications and will be increasingly combined with top-down methods in the future. Figure 1 Proteomic strategies: bottom-up vs. top-down vs. middle-down. The bottom-up approach analyzes proteolytic peptides. The top-down method measures the intact proteins. The middle-down strategy analyzes larger peptides resulted from limited digestion or ... In the past decade shotgun proteomics has been widely used by biologists for many different research experiments, advancing biological discoveries. Some applications include, but are not limited to, proteome profiling, protein quantification, protein modification, and protein-protein interaction. There have been several reviews nicely summarizing mass spectrometry history,15 protein quantification with mass spectrometry,16 its biological applications,5,17–26 and many recent advances in methodology.27–32 In this review, we try to provide a full and updated survey of shotgun proteomics, including the fundamental techniques and applications that laid the foundation along with those developed and greatly improved in the past several years.

Proteogenomic characterization of human colon and rectal cancer

Abstract: Extensive genomic characterization of human cancers presents the problem of inference from genomic abnormalities to cancer phenotypes. To address this problem, we analysed proteomes of colon and rectal tumours characterized previously by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and perform integrated proteogenomic analyses. Somatic variants displayed reduced protein abundance compared to germline variants. Messenger RNA transcript abundance did not reliably predict protein abundance differences between tumours. Proteomics identified five proteomic subtypes in the TCGA cohort, two of which overlapped with the TCGA 'microsatellite instability/CpG island methylation phenotype' transcriptomic subtype, but had distinct mutation, methylation and protein expression patterns associated with different clinical outcomes. Although copy number alterations showed strong cis- and trans-effects on mRNA abundance, relatively few of these extend to the protein level. Thus, proteomics data enabled prioritization of candidate driver genes. The chromosome 20q amplicon was associated with the largest global changes at both mRNA and protein levels; proteomics data highlighted potential 20q candidates, including HNF4A (hepatocyte nuclear factor 4, alpha), TOMM34 (translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 34) and SRC (SRC proto-oncogene, non-receptor tyrosine kinase). Integrated proteogenomic analysis provides functional context to interpret genomic abnormalities and affords a new paradigm for understanding cancer biology.

MS-GF+ makes progress towards a universal database search tool for proteomics.

Abstract: The development of software tools to analyse large mass spectrometry data sets lags behind the increase in diversity of the data. Here the authors develop MS-GF+, a database search tool that outperforms other popular tools in identifying peptides from a variety of data sets.