scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Lorenzo Alibardi

Bio: Lorenzo Alibardi is an academic researcher from University of Bologna. The author has contributed to research in topics: Corneous & Regeneration (biology). The author has an hindex of 40, co-authored 321 publications receiving 6569 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The present review focuses on past and recent information on the evolution of reptilian epidermis and the stratum corneum, and the evolutions of the horny layer in Therapsids and Saurospids (reptiles and birds).
Abstract: The adaptation to land from amphibians to amniotes was accompanied by drastic changes of the integument, some of which might be reconstructed by studying the formation of the stratum corneum during embryogenesis. As the first amniotes were reptiles, the present review focuses on past and recent information on the evolution of reptilian epidermis and the stratum corneum. We aim to generalize the discussion on the evolution of the skin in amniotes. Corneous cell envelopes were absent in fish, and first appeared in adult amphibian epidermis. Stem reptiles evolved a multilayered stratum corneum based on a programmed cell death, intensified the production of matrix proteins (e.g., HRPs), corneous cell envelope proteins (e.g., loricrine-like, sciellin-like, and transglutaminase), and complex lipids to limit water loss. Other proteins were later produced in association to the soft or hairy epidermis in therapsids (e.g., involucrin, profilaggrin-filaggrin, trichohyalin, trichocytic keratins), or to the hard keratin of hairs, quills, horns, claws (e.g., tyrosine-rich, glycine-rich, sulphur-rich matrix proteins). In sauropsids special proteins associated to hard keratinization in scales (e.g., scale beta-keratins, cytokeratin associated proteins) or feathers (feather beta-keratins and HRPs) were originated. The temporal deposition of beta-keratin in lepidosaurian reptiles originated a vertical stratified epidermis and an intraepidermal shedding layer. The evolutions of the horny layer in Therapsids (mammals) and Saurospids (reptiles and birds) are discussed. The study of the molecules involved in the dermo-epidermal interactions in reptilian skin and the molecular biology of epidermal proteins are among the most urgent future areas of research in the biology of reptilian skin.

200 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Attention is drawn to two issues: 1) the tips of the spinules arising from the mature oberhautchen are markedly curved; this morphology can be seen during differentiation; and 2) the median keels of scales from all parts of the body show “naked” oberHautchen cells that lack characteristic spinules, but have a membrane morphology comprising a complex system of serpentine microridges.
Abstract: Previous reports on the fine structure of lizard epidermis are confirmed and extended by SEM and TEM observations of cell differentiation and the form of shed material from the American anole Anolis carolinensis. Attention is drawn to two issues: 1) the tips of the spinules arising from the mature oberhautchen are markedly curved; this morphology can be seen during differentiation; 2) the median keels of scales from all parts of the body show "naked" oberhautchen cells that lack characteristic spinules, but have a membrane morphology comprising a complex system of serpentine microridges. Maderson's ([1966] J. Morphol. 119:39-50) "zip-fastener" model for the role of the shedding complex formed by the clear layer and oberhautchen is reviewed and extended in the light of recent SEM data. Apparently periodic lepidosaurian sloughing permits somatic growth; understanding how the phenomenon is brought about requires integration of data from the organismic to the molecular level. The diverse forms of integumentary microornamentation (MO) reported in the literature can be understood by considering how the cellular events occurring during the renewal phase prior to shedding relate to the emergence of the form-function complex of the β-layer, which provides physical protection. Issues concerning the evolutionary origin of lepidosaurian skin-shedding are discussed. J. Morphol. 236:1-24, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

160 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The purpose of this perspective is to highlight the merit of the reptile integument as an experimental model and underscore how further development of this novel experimental model will be valuable in filling the gaps of the authors' understanding of the Evo-Devo of amniote integuments.
Abstract: The purpose of this perspective is to highlight the merit of the reptile integument as an experimental model. Reptiles represent the first amniotes. From stem reptiles, extant reptiles, birds and mammals have evolved. Mammal hairs and feathers evolved from Therapsid and Sauropsid reptiles, respectively. The early reptilian integument had to adapt to the challenges of terrestrial life, developing a multi-layered stratum corneum capable of barrier function and ultraviolet protection. For better mechanical protection, diverse reptilian scale types have evolved. The evolution of endothermy has driven the convergent evolution of hair and feather follicles: both form multiple localized growth units with stem cells and transient amplifying cells protected in the proximal follicle. This topological arrangement allows them to elongate, molt and regenerate without structural constraints. Another unique feature of reptile skin is the exquisite arrangement of scales and pigment patterns, making them testable models for mechanisms of pattern formation. Since they face the constant threat of damage on land, different strategies were developed to accommodate skin homeostasis and regeneration. Temporally, they can be under continuous renewal or sloughing cycles. Spatially, they can be diffuse or form discrete localized growth units (follicles). To understand how gene regulatory networks evolved to produce increasingly complex ectodermal organs, we have to study how prototypic scale-forming pathways in reptiles are modulated to produce appendage novelties. Despite the fact that there are numerous studies of reptile scales, molecular analyses have lagged behind. Here, we underscore how further development of this novel experimental model will be valuable in filling the gaps of our understanding of the Evo-Devo of amniote integuments.

129 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The data suggest that an important component of the cornified protein envelope of mammalian keratinocytes, that is, loricrin, has originated in a common ancestor of modern amniotes, perhaps during the acquisition of a fully terrestrial lifestyle.
Abstract: The evolution of amniotes has involved major molecular innovations in the epidermis. In particular, distinct structural proteins that undergo covalent cross-linking during cornification of keratinocytes facilitate the formation of mechanically resilient superficial cell layers and help to limit water loss to the environment. Special modes of cornification generate amniote-specific skin appendages such as claws, feathers, and hair. In mammals, many protein substrates of cornification are encoded by a cluster of genes, termed the epidermal differentiation complex (EDC). To provide a basis for hypotheses about the evolution of cornification proteins, we screened for homologs of the EDC in non-mammalian vertebrates. By comparative genomics, de novo gene prediction and gene expression analyses, we show that, in contrast to fish and amphibians, the chicken and the green anole lizard have EDC homologs comprising genes that are specifically expressed in the epidermis and in skin appendages. Our data suggest that an important component of the cornified protein envelope of mammalian keratinocytes, that is, loricrin, has originated in a common ancestor of modern amniotes, perhaps during the acquisition of a fully terrestrial lifestyle. Moreover, we provide evidence that the sauropsid-specific beta-keratins have evolved as a subclass of EDC genes. Based on the comprehensive characterization of the arrangement, exon-intron structures and conserved sequence elements of EDC genes, we propose new scenarios for the evolutionary origin of epidermal barrier proteins via fusion of neighboring S100A and peptidoglycan recognition protein genes, subsequent loss of exons and highly divergent sequence evolution.

101 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is believed that context and various changes in plasticity biomarkers can help identify at least three types of EMT and that using a collection of criteria for EMT increases the likelihood that everyone is studying the same phenomenon - namely, the transition of epithelial and endothelial cells to a motile phenotype.
Abstract: In the early 19th century, building on observations of microscopists now ancient, Schleiden and Schwann formulated the doctrine that cells are building blocks for plant and animal tissues (1). By the mid-19th century, Raspail, Remak, and Virchow expanded this hypothesis by suggesting that all cells come from preexisting cells — the so-called cell theory. Although referring to cell division, this now classic notion is prescient of another contemporary twist in the biology of cell maturation: beyond lineage development and normal differentiation, mature epithelial cells under new environmental pressures exhibit a local plasticity that allows them to morph into other mature phenotypes with or without proliferation (2, 3). Growing interest in the biology of these cellular transitions helped both establish epithelial cell plasticity as a field of study in the late 20th century and fashion much of the current thinking regarding morphogenesis in early embryonic development, tissue repair, and cancer metastasis (4–6). The details of some of these processes are not discussed here, as they are outlined in other articles in this Review Series on epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) (7, 8). Instead, we offer a personal view gathered from our own experience and the literature regarding an approach documenting EMT events in culture or tissue. We hope this serves to stimulate other points of view as new data emerge.

2,016 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Guojie Zhang1, Guojie Zhang2, Cai Li1, Qiye Li1, Bo Li1, Denis M. Larkin3, Chul Hee Lee4, Jay F. Storz5, Agostinho Antunes6, Matthew J. Greenwold7, Robert W. Meredith8, Anders Ödeen9, Jie Cui10, Qi Zhou11, Luohao Xu1, Hailin Pan1, Zongji Wang12, Lijun Jin1, Pei Zhang1, Haofu Hu1, Wei Yang1, Jiang Hu1, Jin Xiao1, Zhikai Yang1, Yang Liu1, Qiaolin Xie1, Hao Yu1, Jinmin Lian1, Ping Wen1, Fang Zhang1, Hui Li1, Yongli Zeng1, Zijun Xiong1, Shiping Liu12, Long Zhou1, Zhiyong Huang1, Na An1, Jie Wang13, Qiumei Zheng1, Yingqi Xiong1, Guangbiao Wang1, Bo Wang1, Jingjing Wang1, Yu Fan14, Rute R. da Fonseca2, Alonzo Alfaro-Núñez2, Mikkel Schubert2, Ludovic Orlando2, Tobias Mourier2, Jason T. Howard15, Ganeshkumar Ganapathy15, Andreas R. Pfenning15, Osceola Whitney15, Miriam V. Rivas15, Erina Hara15, Julia Smith15, Marta Farré3, Jitendra Narayan16, Gancho T. Slavov16, Michael N Romanov17, Rui Borges6, João Paulo Machado6, Imran Khan6, Mark S. Springer18, John Gatesy18, Federico G. Hoffmann19, Juan C. Opazo20, Olle Håstad21, Roger H. Sawyer7, Heebal Kim4, Kyu-Won Kim4, Hyeon Jeong Kim4, Seoae Cho4, Ning Li22, Yinhua Huang22, Michael William Bruford23, Xiangjiang Zhan13, Andrew Dixon, Mads F. Bertelsen24, Elizabeth P. Derryberry25, Wesley C. Warren26, Richard K. Wilson26, Shengbin Li27, David A. Ray19, Richard E. Green28, Stephen J. O'Brien29, Darren K. Griffin17, Warren E. Johnson30, David Haussler28, Oliver A. Ryder, Eske Willerslev2, Gary R. Graves31, Per Alström21, Jon Fjeldså32, David P. Mindell33, Scott V. Edwards34, Edward L. Braun35, Carsten Rahbek32, David W. Burt36, Peter Houde37, Yong Zhang1, Huanming Yang38, Jian Wang1, Erich D. Jarvis15, M. Thomas P. Gilbert2, M. Thomas P. Gilbert39, Jun Wang 
12 Dec 2014-Science
TL;DR: This work explored bird macroevolution using full genomes from 48 avian species representing all major extant clades to reveal that pan-avian genomic diversity covaries with adaptations to different lifestyles and convergent evolution of traits.
Abstract: Birds are the most species-rich class of tetrapod vertebrates and have wide relevance across many research fields. We explored bird macroevolution using full genomes from 48 avian species representing all major extant clades. The avian genome is principally characterized by its constrained size, which predominantly arose because of lineage-specific erosion of repetitive elements, large segmental deletions, and gene loss. Avian genomes furthermore show a remarkably high degree of evolutionary stasis at the levels of nucleotide sequence, gene synteny, and chromosomal structure. Despite this pattern of conservation, we detected many non-neutral evolutionary changes in protein-coding genes and noncoding regions. These analyses reveal that pan-avian genomic diversity covaries with adaptations to different lifestyles and convergent evolution of traits.

872 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is accepted that MGD is important, conceivably underestimated, and possibly the most frequent cause of dry eye disease due to increased evaporation of the aqueous tears, and a comprehensive review of physiological and pathophysiological aspects of the meibomian glands is sought.
Abstract: The tarsal glands of Meibom (glandulae tarsales) are large sebaceous glands located in the eyelids and, unlike those of the skin, are unassociated with hairs. According to Duke-Elder and Wyler,1 they were first mentioned by Galenus in 200 AD and later, in 1666, they were described in more detail by the German physician and anatomist Heinrich Meibom, after whom they are named. Lipids produced by the meibomian glands are the main component of the superficial lipid layer of the tear film that protects it against evaporation of the aqueous phase and is believed also to stabilize the tear film by lowering surface tension.2 Hence, meibomian lipids are essential for the maintenance of ocular surface health and integrity. Although they share certain principal characteristics with ordinary sebaceous glands, they have several distinct differences in anatomy, location, secretory regulation, composition of their secretory product, and function. Functional disorders of the meibomian glands, referred to today as meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD),3 are increasingly recognized as a discrete disease entity.4–8 In patients with dry eye disease, alterations in the lipid phase that point to MGD are reportedly more frequent than isolated alterations in the aqueous phase. In a study by Heiligenhaus et al.,9 a lipid deficiency occurred in 76.7% of dry eye patients compared with only 11.1% of those with isolated alterations of the aqueous phase. This result is in line with the observations by Shimazaki et al.10 of a prevalence of MGD in the absolute majority of eyes with ocular discomfort defined as dry eye symptoms. These observations noted that 64.6% of all such eyes and 74.5% of those excluding a deficiency of aqueous tear secretion were found to have obstructive MGD, or a loss of glandular tissue, or both.10 Horwath-Winter et al.11 reported MGD in 78% of dry eye patients or, if only non-Sjogren patients are considered, in 87% compared with 13% with isolated aqueous tear deficiency. It may thus be accepted that MGD is important, conceivably underestimated, and possibly the most frequent cause of dry eye disease due to increased evaporation of the aqueous tears.5,9–12 After some excellent reviews of MGD4,7,8,13,14 in the past, many new findings have been reported in recent years, and other questions remain to be identified and resolved. A sound understanding of meibomian gland structure and function and its role in the functional anatomy of the ocular surface15 is needed, to understand the contribution of the meibomian glands to dysfunction and disease. Herein, we seek to provide a comprehensive review of physiological and pathophysiological aspects of the meibomian glands.

799 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The concepts of keratins and of keratinized or cornified epithelia need clarification and revision concerning the structure and function of kerATins and keratin filaments in various epithelium of different species, as well as of Keratin genes and their modifications in view of recent research.
Abstract: Historically, the term ‘keratin’ stood for all of the proteins extracted from skin modifications, such as horns, claws and hooves. Subsequently, it was realized that this keratin is actually a mixture of keratins, keratin filament-associated proteins and other proteins, such as enzymes. Keratins were then defined as certain filament-forming proteins with specific physicochemical properties and extracted from the cornified layer of the epidermis, whereas those filament-forming proteins that were extracted from the living layers of the epidermis were grouped as ‘prekeratins’ or ‘cytokeratins’. Currently, the term ‘keratin’ covers all intermediate filament-forming proteins with specific physicochemical properties and produced in any vertebrate epithelia. Similarly, the nomenclature of epithelia as cornified, keratinized or non-keratinized is based historically on the notion that only the epidermis of skin modifications such as horns, claws and hooves is cornified, that the non-modified epidermis is a keratinized stratified epithelium, and that all other stratified and non-stratified epithelia are non-keratinized epithelia. At this point in time, the concepts of keratins and of keratinized or cornified epithelia need clarification and revision concerning the structure and function of keratin and keratin filaments in various epithelia of different species, as well as of keratin genes and their modifications, in view of recent research, such as the sequencing of keratin proteins and their genes, cell culture, transfection of epithelial cells, immunohistochemistry and immunoblotting. Recently, new functions of keratins and keratin filaments in cell signaling and intracellular vesicle transport have been discovered. It is currently understood that all stratified epithelia are keratinized and that some of these keratinized stratified epithelia cornify by forming a Stratum corneum. The processes of keratinization and cornification in skin modifications are different especially with respect to the keratins that are produced. Future research in keratins will provide a better understanding of the processes of keratinization and cornification of stratified epithelia, including those of skin modifications, of the adaptability of epithelia in general, of skin diseases, and of the changes in structure and function of epithelia in the course of evolution. This review focuses on keratins and keratin filaments in mammalian tissue but keratins in the tissues of some other vertebrates are also considered.

524 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Keratin can be classified as α- and β-types as discussed by the authors, and α-types have a characteristic filament-matrix structure: 7nm diameter intermediate filaments for α-keratin, and 3nm diameter filament for β-kkeratin.

523 citations