Author
Luc Doyen
Other affiliations: Paris Dauphine University, CEREMADE, University of Paris ...read more
Bio: Luc Doyen is an academic researcher from University of Bordeaux. The author has contributed to research in topics: Sustainability & Fisheries management. The author has an hindex of 33, co-authored 139 publications receiving 3085 citations. Previous affiliations of Luc Doyen include Paris Dauphine University & CEREMADE.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
University of Montpellier1, University of Rennes2, University of Bordeaux3, Lille University of Science and Technology4, University of Nantes5, University of Paris-Sud6, University of Paris7, Centre national de la recherche scientifique8, SupAgro9, University of Grenoble10, École Normale Supérieure11, University of Hohenheim12
TL;DR: The context provided by the current surge of ecological predictions on the future of biodiversity is used to clarify what prediction means, and to pinpoint the challenges that should be addressed in order to improve predictive ecological models and the way they are understood and used.
Abstract: 1. In a rapidly changing world, ecology has the potential to move from empirical and conceptual stages to application and management issues. It is now possible to make large-scale predictions up to continental or global scales, ranging from the future distribution of biological diversity to changes in ecosystem functioning and services. With these recent developments, ecology has a historical opportunity to become a major actor in the development of a sustainable human society. With this opportunity, however, also comes an important responsibility in developing appropriate predictive models, correctly interpreting their outcomes and communicating their limitations. There is also a danger that predictions grow faster than our understanding of ecological systems, resulting in a gap between the scientists generating the predictions and stakeholders using them (conservation biologists, environmental managers, journalists, policymakers).
2. Here, we use the context provided by the current surge of ecological predictions on the future of biodiversity to clarify what prediction means, and to pinpoint the challenges that should be addressed in order to improve predictive ecological models and the way they are
understood and used.
3. Synthesis and applications. Ecologists face several challenges to ensure the healthy development of an operational predictive ecological science: (i) clarity on the distinction between explanatory and anticipatory predictions; (ii) developing new theories at the interface between
explanatory and anticipatory predictions; (iii) open data to test and validate predictions; (iv) making predictions operational; and (v) developing a genuine ethics of prediction.
222 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, a simple dynamic model dealing with the management of a marine renewable resource is presented, where instead of studying the ecological and economic interactions in terms of equilibrium or optimal control, the authors pay much attention to the viability of the system or, in a symmetric way, to crisis situations.
204 citations
•
25 Aug 2008
TL;DR: Sequential decision models.- Equilibrium and stability.- Viable sequential decisions.- Optimal sequential decisions.– Sequential decisions under uncertainty.- Robust and stochastic viability.
Abstract: Sequential decision models.- Equilibrium and stability.- Viable sequential decisions.- Optimal sequential decisions.- Sequential decisions under uncertainty.- Robust and stochastic viability.- Robust and stochastic optimization.- Sequential decision under imperfect information.
128 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the conditions for the sustainability of a production-consumption system based on the use of an exhaustible natural resource are examined, defined by a set of constraints combining guaranteed consumption and a stock of resources to be preserved at all times.
126 citations
••
Australian National University1, University of Bordeaux2, International Center for Tropical Agriculture3, Environmental Change Institute4, James Cook University5, University of Oxford6, Sichuan University7, University of Greenwich8, University of Melbourne9, Hobart Corporation10, King's College London11, International Food Policy Research Institute12, National Marine Fisheries Service13, Norwegian School of Economics14, University of Santiago de Compostela15, University of Adelaide16
TL;DR: In this article, the authors define social-ecological resilience as a property of social ecological systems that includes resistance, recovery and robustness (the "three Rs"), and integrate the three Rs into a heuristic for resilience management that they apply in multiple management contexts to offer practical, systematic guidance about how to realize resilience.
Abstract: Researchers and decision-makers lack a shared understanding of resilience, and practical applications in environmental resource management are rare. Here, we define social-ecological resilience as a property of social-ecological systems that includes at least three main characteristics — resistance, recovery and robustness (the ‘three Rs’). We define socio-economic resilience management as planning, adaptation and transformational actions that may influence these system characteristics. We integrate the three Rs into a heuristic for resilience management that we apply in multiple management contexts to offer practical, systematic guidance about how to realize resilience.
95 citations
Cited by
More filters
••
TL;DR: The Essay concludes that practitioners theorize, and theorists practice, use these intellectual tools differently because the goals and orientations of theorists and practitioners, and the constraints under which they act, differ.
Abstract: Much has been written about theory and practice in the law, and the tension between practitioners and theorists. Judges do not cite theoretical articles often; they rarely "apply" theories to particular cases. These arguments are not revisited. Instead the Essay explores the working and interaction of theory and practice, practitioners and theorists. The Essay starts with a story about solving a legal issue using our intellectual tools - theory, practice, and their progenies: experience and "gut." Next the Essay elaborates on the nature of theory, practice, experience and "gut." The third part of the Essay discusses theories that are helpful to practitioners and those that are less helpful. The Essay concludes that practitioners theorize, and theorists practice. They use these intellectual tools differently because the goals and orientations of theorists and practitioners, and the constraints under which they act, differ. Theory, practice, experience and "gut" help us think, remember, decide and create. They complement each other like the two sides of the same coin: distinct but inseparable.
2,077 citations
••
TL;DR: An intertwined supply network (ISN) is an entirety of interconnected supply chains (SC) which, in their integrity secure the provision of society and markets with goods and services.
Abstract: An intertwined supply network (ISN) is an entirety of interconnected supply chains (SC) which, in their integrity secure the provision of society and markets with goods and services. The ISNs are o...
863 citations
••
University of Connecticut1, University of Aberdeen2, McGill University3, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ4, University of Paris5, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences6, University of Bristol7, National Marine Fisheries Service8, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven9, Lincoln University (New Zealand)10, University of Minnesota11, University of Florida12, University of Osnabrück13, Université Paris-Saclay14, University of Montpellier15, Purdue University16
TL;DR: This work identifies six biological mechanisms that commonly shape responses to climate change yet are too often missing from current predictive models and prioritize the types of information needed to inform each of these mechanisms, and suggests proxies for data that are missing or difficult to collect.
Abstract: BACKGROUND As global climate change accelerates, one of the most urgent tasks for the coming decades is to develop accurate predictions about biological responses to guide the effective protection of biodiversity. Predictive models in biology provide a means for scientists to project changes to species and ecosystems in response to disturbances such as climate change. Most current predictive models, however, exclude important biological mechanisms such as demography, dispersal, evolution, and species interactions. These biological mechanisms have been shown to be important in mediating past and present responses to climate change. Thus, current modeling efforts do not provide sufficiently accurate predictions. Despite the many complexities involved, biologists are rapidly developing tools that include the key biological processes needed to improve predictive accuracy. The biggest obstacle to applying these more realistic models is that the data needed to inform them are almost always missing. We suggest ways to fill this growing gap between model sophistication and information to predict and prevent the most damaging aspects of climate change for life on Earth. ADVANCES On the basis of empirical and theoretical evidence, we identify six biological mechanisms that commonly shape responses to climate change yet are too often missing from current predictive models: physiology; demography, life history, and phenology; species interactions; evolutionary potential and population differentiation; dispersal, colonization, and range dynamics; and responses to environmental variation. We prioritize the types of information needed to inform each of these mechanisms and suggest proxies for data that are missing or difficult to collect. We show that even for well-studied species, we often lack critical information that would be necessary to apply more realistic, mechanistic models. Consequently, data limitations likely override the potential gains in accuracy of more realistic models. Given the enormous challenge of collecting this detailed information on millions of species around the world, we highlight practical methods that promote the greatest gains in predictive accuracy. Trait-based approaches leverage sparse data to make more general inferences about unstudied species. Targeting species with high climate sensitivity and disproportionate ecological impact can yield important insights about future ecosystem change. Adaptive modeling schemes provide a means to target the most important data while simultaneously improving predictive accuracy. OUTLOOK Strategic collections of essential biological information will allow us to build generalizable insights that inform our broader ability to anticipate species’ responses to climate change and other human-caused disturbances. By increasing accuracy and making uncertainties explicit, scientists can deliver improved projections for biodiversity under climate change together with characterizations of uncertainty to support more informed decisions by policymakers and land managers. Toward this end, a globally coordinated effort to fill data gaps in advance of the growing climate-fueled biodiversity crisis offers substantial advantages in efficiency, coverage, and accuracy. Biologists can take advantage of the lessons learned from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s development, coordination, and integration of climate change projections. Climate and weather projections were greatly improved by incorporating important mechanisms and testing predictions against global weather station data. Biology can do the same. We need to adopt this meteorological approach to predicting biological responses to climate change to enhance our ability to mitigate future changes to global biodiversity and the services it provides to humans.
755 citations