M. O. Humphreys And

Bio: M. O. Humphreys And is an academic researcher from Aberystwyth University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Agrostis & Agrostis capillaris. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 1 publications receiving 54 citations.

Relationships between tolerance to heavy metals in agrostis capillaris l. (a. tenuis sibth.)

Abstract: Heavy-metal tolerance was investigated in Agrostis capillaris L. (A. tenuis Sibth.) using a standard rooting test on plants originating from a copper-contaminated site (Parys Mountain) and a lead-contaminated site (Goginan). Six F1 families obtained by interpopulation hybridization and F2 and backcross generations derived from one of them were screened. Estimates of the genetic and environmental components of phenotypic correlation were obtained in terms of both root length and tolerance index. Results are discussed in relation to problems of interpretation of evidence for multiple- or co-tolerance based on tolerance indices and phenotypic correlations.

Biochemical, physiological, and structural effects of excess copper in plants

Abstract: Heavy metal pollution is one of the most troublesome environmental problems faced by mankind nowadays. Copper, in particular, poses serious problems due to its widespread industrial and agricultural use. Unlike other heavy metals, such as cadmium, lead, and mercury, copper is not readily bioaccumulated and thus its toxicity to man and other mammals is relatively low. On the contrary, plants in general are very sensitive to Cu toxicity, displaying metabolic disturbances and growth inhibition at Cu contents in the tissues only slightly higher than the normal levels. The reduced mobility of Cu in soil and sediments, due to its strong binding to organic and inorganic colloids, constitutes, in a way, a barrier to Cu toxicity in land plants. In aqueous media, however, plants are directly exposed to the harmful effects of Cu and, thus, algae and some species of aquatic higher plants are more easily subjected to Cu toxicity. Excess Cu inhibits a large number of enzymes and interferes with several aspects of plant biochemistry, including photosynthesis, pigment synthesis, and membrane integrity. Perhaps its most important effect is associated with the blocking of photosynthetic electron transport, leading to the production of radicals which start peroxidative chain reactions involving membrane lipids. Copper effects on plant physiology are wide ranging, including interference with fatty acid and protein metabolism and inhibition of respiration and nitrogen fixation processes. At the whole plant level Cu is an effective inhibitor of vegetative growth and induces general symptoms of senescence. The high toxicity of Cu to plants has led to the evolution of several strategies of defense. Among the most important ones is the production of Cu-complexing compounds. Although the nature, structure, and function of these compounds is still controversial, they can be divided into two main groups: metallothionein-like compounds and phytochelatins. The latter appears to constitute the most widespread response of plants to stresses provoked by metals, including Cu.

Metal tolerance in plants

Abstract: Nearly 60 years ago, Prat (1934) initiated the research of heavy metal resistance in plants when he was analysing the growth performance of two populations of Silene dioica (Melandrium sylvestre), one from a copper mine and one from a non-mine soil. He was able to demonstrate a heritable copper resistance in the mine population, relative to the non-mine population, which he explained as a result of evolution by natural selection. Nearly 20 years later Bradshaw (1952) and Baumeister (1954) started further research on ecological and physiological differentiation between plants from metal-enriched and noncontaminated habitats. The species chosen for study were predominantly Agrostis capillaris in the Bradshaw group (Jowett 1959; Gregory 1965; McNeilly 1965; Antonovics 1966) and Silene vulgaris in the Baumeister group (Broker 1962; Ernst 1964; Gries 1965; Riither 1966). In the late 1950s Duvigneaud (1958), while studying the vegetation on metalliferous soils in Central Africa, added to the above approaches a phytogeographic one and introduced the study of speciation processes in metallophytes. In the 1950s, the study of evolutionary and physiological aspects of metal resistance was hampered by the absence of convenient techniques for measuring metal concentrations in small plant samples. The techniques available for metal analysis were either timeconsuming, such as phase separation (Ernst 1964), or costly and only applicable for laboratory-raised plant material, i.e. radiolabelling (Turner & Gregory 1967; Peterson 1969). Only after applying atomic absorption spectrophotometry on wet-ashed plant material (Reilly 1967) did time and cost-effective metal analyses become possible.

The genetics of metal tolerance in vascular plants.

Abstract: SUMMARY In many parts of the world soils are detrimental to plant growth owing to elevated levels of metal ions, caused either by natural processes or by the result of man's activities. Many plants have evolved ecotypes or varieties that are able to grow more-or-less normally on these soils. This paper reviews our knowledge of the genetics of this phenomenon. The nature of tolerance and the problems of its measurement are discussed. Tolerance is frequently measured by an index produced by comparing growth in a contaminated environment with growth in a control environment. It is argued that this measurement is inappropriate for many genetical studies, and that it is frequently more useful to use growth at a single critical level of metal as a measure of tolerance. Polygenic inheritance provides a null hypothesis that has to be tested in a genetical analysis. Examples of major genes for tolerance to aluminium, arsenic, boron, cadmium, copper and manganese are discussed. Even where major genes have been demonstrated, it is probable that other minor genes, ‘modifiers’, are present as well. Because of the nature of tolerance as a character, dominance and epistasis are likely to vary with the level of metal at which an analysis is performed. Tolerance is generally found to be dominant at some levels of the metal. Studies which have mapped tolerance genes, particularly to aluminium and salt, are discussed. The specificity of tolerance is a matter of some confusion. Some studies indicate that tolerances evolve independently to different metals, but others have suggested that tolerance to one metal may often confer a degree of tolerance to some other metals. Very little is known about the molecular genetics of tolerance, and the mechanisms of tolerance to most metals. The possible role of phytochelatins and metallothionein-like proteins in metal tolerance is discussed. The distribution of tolerance in natural populations suggests that tolerance is a disadvantage in uncontaminated environments, but how this ‘cost’ arises is not known. There is some evidence that the disadvantage to tolerance may be associated more with the modifiers of tolerance than with the primary tolerance gene. The study of the genetics of tolerance is of importance in planning breeding programmes to produce tolerant crops for use in areas where metal contamination is a limiting factor in productivity. It can also assist in understanding the mechanisms of tolerance, as exemplified by the study of the mechanism of arsenic tolerance in Holcus lanatus. Important areas for further research are discussed.

Genetic control of copper tolerance in silene vulgaris

Abstract: The genetic control of heavy metal tolerance in higher plants is poorly understood, possibly in part because of several inherent properties of tolerance tests and tolerance measures. In this study we compared different methods of testing for copper tolerance in Silene vulgaris. A new type of multiple concentration test has been used to analyse the genetic control of copper tolerance in this species. Provisional results indicate that the occurrence of any tolerance, relative to a non-tolerant reference population from uncontaminated soil, is governed by a single major gene. The level of tolerance, however, seems to be controlled by a number of modifiers, which are completely hypostatic to the major gene. This model agrees with that proposed for Mimulus guttatus by Macnair (1983).