scispace - formally typeset
M

Madhu Rao

Researcher at Wildlife Conservation Society

Publications -  50
Citations -  3262

Madhu Rao is an academic researcher from Wildlife Conservation Society. The author has contributed to research in topics: Wildlife trade & Endangered species. The author has an hindex of 22, co-authored 44 publications receiving 2783 citations. Previous affiliations of Madhu Rao include Duke University & University of Cambridge.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Impacts of hunting on tropical forests in Southeast Asia

TL;DR: Evidence from multiple sites indicated animal populations declined precipitously across the region since approximately 1980, and many species are now extirpated from substantial portions of their former ranges, Unless there is a step change in efforts to reduce wildlife exploitation to sustainable levels, the region will likely lose most of its iconic species, andmany others besides, within the next few years.
Journal ArticleDOI

Local people value environmental services provided by forested parks

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used data from five protected forests in four developing Southeast Asian countries, and provided evidence that local people living near parks value a wide range of environmental services, including cultural, provisioning, and regulating services, provided by the forests.
Journal ArticleDOI

Status Review of the Protected‐Area System in Myanmar, with Recommendations for Conservation Planning

TL;DR: In this paper, the status of 20 of the 31 officially gazetted protected areas in Myanmar within a framework that classified activities incompatible with protected-area status into two broad categories, small and large scale.
Journal ArticleDOI

Do community-conserved areas effectively conserve biological diversity? Global insights and the Indian context.

TL;DR: It is found that there were few consistent differences in diversity/species richness of flora or fauna protected under the two types of management or in deforestation rates, and CCAs conserve biological values more effectively than open-access areas.