Manikandan M

Bio: Manikandan M is an academic researcher from VIT University. The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 1 publications receiving 10 citations.

False Alarms and Overmonitoring: Major Factors in Alarm Fatigue Among Labor Nurses.

Abstract: Background Nurses can be exposed to hundreds of alarms during their shift, contributing to alarm fatigue. Purpose The purposes were to explore similarities and differences in perceptions of clinical alarms by labor nurses caring for generally healthy women compared with perceptions of adult intensive care unit (ICU) and neonatal ICU nurses caring for critically ill patients and to seek nurses' suggestions for potential improvements. Methods Nurses were asked via focus groups about the utility of clinical alarms from medical devices. Results There was consensus that false alarms and too many devices generating alarms contributed to alarm fatigue, and most alarms lacked clinical relevance. Nurses identified certain types of alarms that they responded to immediately, but the vast majority of the alarms did not contribute to their clinical assessment or planned nursing care. Conclusions Monitoring only those patients who need it and only those physiologic values that are warranted, based on patient condition, may decrease alarm burden.

No. 396-Fetal Health Surveillance: Intrapartum Consensus Guideline.

Abstract: Objective To present evidence and recommendations regarding use, classification, interpretation, response, and documentation of fetal surveillance in the intrapartum period and to provide information to help minimize the risk of birth asphyxia while maintaining the lowest possible rate of obstetrical intervention. Intended users Members of intrapartum care teams, including but not limited to obstetricians, family physicians, midwives and nurses, and their learners TARGET POPULATION: Intrapartum women OPTIONS: All methods of uterine activity assessment and fetal heart rate surveillance were considered in developing this document. Outcomes The impact, benefits, and risks of different methods of surveillance on the diverse maternal-fetal health conditions have been reviewed based on current evidence and expert opinion. No fetal surveillance method will provide 100% detection of fetal compromise; thus, all FHS methods are viewed as screening tests. As the evidence continues to evolve, caregivers from all disciplines are encouraged to attend evidence-based Canadian educational programs every 2 years. Evidence Literature published between January 1976 and February 2019 was reviewed. Medline, the Cochrane Database, and international guidelines were used to search the literature for all studies on intrapartum fetal surveillance. Validation methods The principal and contributing authors agreed to the content and recommendations. The Board of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada approved the final draft for publication. The level of evidence has been determined using the criteria and classifications of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Benefits, harm, and costs Consistent interdisciplinary use of the guideline, appropriate equipment, and trained professional staff enhances safe intrapartum care. Women and their support person(s) should be informed of the benefits and harms of different methods of fetal health surveillance. Recommendations CommunicationSupport During Active LabourPrinciples of Intrapartum Fetal SurveillanceSelecting the Method of Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring: Intermittent Auscultation or Electronic Fetal MonitoringPaper SpeedAdmission AssessmentsEpidural AnalgesiaIntermittent Auscultation in LabourElectronic Fetal Monitoring in LabourClassification of Intrapartum Fetal SurveillanceMaternal Heart RateFetal Health Surveillance Assessment in the Active Second Stage of LabourIntrauterine ResuscitationDigital Fetal Scalp StimulationFetal Scalp Blood SamplingUmbilical Cord Blood GasesDocumentationFetal Surveillance Technology Not RecommendedFetal Health Surveillance Education.

The Value of the Maternity Care Team in the Promotion of Physiologic Birth.

Abstract: The benefits of normal, physiologic birth have been well documented. Health care providers such as nurses, midwives, and physicians have distinct and significant roles in the promotion of physiologic birth processes. By supporting women and families, doulas can enhance the maternity care team and further facilitate physiologic birth. A collaborative maternity care team can foster and support a common goal of safe, satisfying, and affordable care practices associated with physiologic birth.