scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Marc J. Gunter

Bio: Marc J. Gunter is an academic researcher from International Agency for Research on Cancer. The author has contributed to research in topics: Mendelian randomization & Cancer. The author has an hindex of 9, co-authored 18 publications receiving 208 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: These findings point to potentially novel pathways and biomarkers of breast cancer development, and these relationships did not differ by breast cancer subtype, age at diagnosis, fasting status, menopausal status, or adiposity.
Abstract: Metabolomics is a promising molecular tool to identify novel etiologic pathways leading to cancer. Using a targeted approach, we prospectively investigated the associations between metabolite concentrations in plasma and breast cancer risk. A nested case-control study was established within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer cohort, which included 1624 first primary incident invasive breast cancer cases (with known estrogen and progesterone receptor and HER2 status) and 1624 matched controls. Metabolites (n = 127, acylcarnitines, amino acids, biogenic amines, glycerophospholipids, hexose, sphingolipids) were measured by mass spectrometry in pre-diagnostic plasma samples and tested for associations with breast cancer incidence using multivariable conditional logistic regression. Among women not using hormones at baseline (n = 2248), and after control for multiple tests, concentrations of arginine (odds ratio [OR] per SD = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70–0.90), asparagine (OR = 0.83 (0.74–0.92)), and phosphatidylcholines (PCs) ae C36:3 (OR = 0.83 (0.76–0.90)), aa C36:3 (OR = 0.84 (0.77–0.93)), ae C34:2 (OR = 0.85 (0.78–0.94)), ae C36:2 (OR = 0.85 (0.78–0.88)), and ae C38:2 (OR = 0.84 (0.76–0.93)) were inversely associated with breast cancer risk, while the acylcarnitine C2 (OR = 1.23 (1.11–1.35)) was positively associated with disease risk. In the overall population, C2 (OR = 1.15 (1.06–1.24)) and PC ae C36:3 (OR = 0.88 (0.82–0.95)) were associated with risk of breast cancer, and these relationships did not differ by breast cancer subtype, age at diagnosis, fasting status, menopausal status, or adiposity. These findings point to potentially novel pathways and biomarkers of breast cancer development. Results warrant replication in other epidemiological studies.

66 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Caroline J. Bull1, Joshua A. Bell1, Neil Murphy2, Eleanor Sanderson1, George Davey Smith1, Nicholas J. Timpson1, Barbara L. Banbury3, Demetrius Albanes4, Sonja I. Berndt4, Stéphane Bézieau, D. Timothy Bishop5, Hermann Brenner6, Daniel D. Buchanan7, Daniel D. Buchanan8, Andrea N. Burnett-Hartman9, Graham Casey10, Sergi Castellví-Bel11, Andrew T. Chan, Jenny Chang-Claude6, Jenny Chang-Claude12, Amanda J. Cross13, Albert de la Chapelle14, Jane C. Figueiredo15, Jane C. Figueiredo16, Steven Gallinger17, Susan M. Gapstur18, Graham G. Giles19, Graham G. Giles8, Graham G. Giles20, Stephen B. Gruber16, Andrea Gsur, Jochen Hampe21, Heather Hampel14, Tabitha A. Harrison3, Michael Hoffmeister6, Li Hsu3, Li Hsu22, Wen-Yi Huang4, Jeroen R. Huyghe3, Mark A. Jenkins8, Corinne E. Joshu23, Temitope O. Keku24, Tilman Kühn6, Sun-Seog Kweon25, Loic Le Marchand26, Christopher I. Li3, Li Li10, Annika Lindblom27, Annika Lindblom28, Vicente Martín29, Anne M. May30, Roger L. Milne19, Roger L. Milne20, Roger L. Milne8, Victor Moreno, Polly A. Newcomb22, Polly A. Newcomb3, Kenneth Offit31, Kenneth Offit32, Shuji Ogino, Amanda I. Phipps22, Amanda I. Phipps3, Elizabeth A. Platz23, John D. Potter, Conghui Qu3, J. Ramón Quirós, Gad Rennert33, Elio Riboli13, Lori C. Sakoda3, Lori C. Sakoda9, Clemens Schafmayer, Robert E. Schoen34, Martha L. Slattery35, Catherine M. Tangen3, Kostas Tsilidis36, Kostas Tsilidis13, Cornelia M. Ulrich37, Fränzel J.B. van Duijnhoven38, Bethany Van Guelpen39, Kala Visvanathan23, Pavel Vodicka40, Pavel Vodicka41, Pavel Vodicka42, Ludmila Vodickova42, Ludmila Vodickova41, Ludmila Vodickova40, Hansong Wang26, Emily White3, Emily White22, Alicja Wolk28, Michael O. Woods43, Anna H. Wu16, Peter T. Campbell18, Wei Zheng44, Ulrike Peters3, Emma E. Vincent1, Marc J. Gunter2 
TL;DR: Adiposity was associated with numerous metabolic alterations, but none of these explained associations between adiposity and CRC, and it is suggested that higher BMI more greatly raises CRC risk among men, whereas higher WHR more greatly rises CRCrisk among women.
Abstract: Higher adiposity increases the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), but whether this relationship varies by anatomical sub-site or by sex is unclear. Further, the metabolic alterations mediating the effects of adiposity on CRC are not fully understood. We examined sex- and site-specific associations of adiposity with CRC risk and whether adiposity-associated metabolites explain the associations of adiposity with CRC. Genetic variants from genome-wide association studies of body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR, unadjusted for BMI; N = 806,810), and 123 metabolites from targeted nuclear magnetic resonance metabolomics (N = 24,925), were used as instruments. Sex-combined and sex-specific Mendelian randomization (MR) was conducted for BMI and WHR with CRC risk (58,221 cases and 67,694 controls in the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium, Colorectal Cancer Transdisciplinary Study, and Colon Cancer Family Registry). Sex-combined MR was conducted for BMI and WHR with metabolites, for metabolites with CRC, and for BMI and WHR with CRC adjusted for metabolite classes in multivariable models. In sex-specific MR analyses, higher BMI (per 4.2 kg/m2) was associated with 1.23 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.08, 1.38) times higher CRC odds among men (inverse-variance-weighted (IVW) model); among women, higher BMI (per 5.2 kg/m2) was associated with 1.09 (95% CI = 0.97, 1.22) times higher CRC odds. WHR (per 0.07 higher) was more strongly associated with CRC risk among women (IVW OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.08, 1.43) than men (IVW OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.81, 1.36). BMI or WHR was associated with 104/123 metabolites at false discovery rate-corrected P ≤ 0.05; several metabolites were associated with CRC, but not in directions that were consistent with the mediation of positive adiposity-CRC relations. In multivariable MR analyses, associations of BMI and WHR with CRC were not attenuated following adjustment for representative metabolite classes, e.g., the univariable IVW OR for BMI with CRC was 1.12 (95% CI = 1.00, 1.26), and this became 1.11 (95% CI = 0.99, 1.26) when adjusting for cholesterol in low-density lipoprotein particles. Our results suggest that higher BMI more greatly raises CRC risk among men, whereas higher WHR more greatly raises CRC risk among women. Adiposity was associated with numerous metabolic alterations, but none of these explained associations between adiposity and CRC. More detailed metabolomic measures are likely needed to clarify the mechanistic pathways.

59 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Mattias Johansson1, Robert Carreras-Torres1, Ghislaine Scelo1, Mark P. Purdue2, Daniela Mariosa1, David C. Muller3, Nicholas J. Timpson4, Philip C Haycock4, Kevin M. Brown2, Zhaoming Wang5, Yuanqing Ye6, Jonathan N. Hofmann2, Matthieu Foll1, Valerie Gaborieau1, Mitchell J. Machiela2, Leandro M. Colli2, Peng Li7, Peng Li1, Jean-Guillaume Garnier8, Jean-Guillaume Garnier9, Hélène Blanché9, Anne Boland8, Laurie Burdette2, Egor Prokhortchouk10, Konstantin G. Skryabin10, Meredith Yeager2, Sanja Radojevic-Skodric, Simona Ognjanovic11, Lenka Foretova, Ivana Holcatova12, Vladimir Janout13, Dana Mates, Anush Mukeriya, Stefan Rascu14, David Zaridze, Vladimir Bencko12, Cezary Cybulski15, Eleonora Fabianova, Viorel Jinga14, Jolanta Lissowska, Jan Lubinski15, Marie Navratilova, Peter Rudnai, Simone Benhamou16, Simone Benhamou17, Geraldine Cancel-Tassin, Olivier Cussenot, Elisabete Weiderpass, Börje Ljungberg18, Raviprakash T. Sitaram18, Christel Häggström19, Christel Häggström18, Fiona Bruinsma20, Susan J. Jordan21, Susan J. Jordan22, Gianluca Severi23, Ingrid Winship24, Kristian Hveem25, Lars J. Vatten25, Tony Fletcher26, Susanna C. Larsson27, Alicja Wolk27, Rosamonde E. Banks28, Peter Selby29, Douglas F. Easton30, Gabriella Andreotti2, Laura E. Beane Freeman2, Stella Koutros2, Satu Männistö2, Stephanie J. Weinstein2, Peter E. Clark31, Todd L. Edwards31, Loren Lipworth31, Susan M. Gapstur32, Victoria L. Stevens32, Hallie Carol33, Matthew L. Freedman33, Mark Pomerantz33, Eunyoung Cho34, Kathryn M. Wilson33, J. Michael Gaziano35, Howard D. Sesso33, Howard D. Sesso35, Neal D. Freedman2, Alexander S. Parker11, Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow11, Wen-Yi Huang2, Richard J. Kahnoski36, Brian R. Lane36, Brian R. Lane37, Sabrina L. Noyes38, Sabrina L. Noyes36, David Petillo38, David Petillo39, Bin Tean Teh, Ulrike Peters40, Emily White40, Garnet L. Anderson40, Lisa Johnson40, Juhua Luo41, Julie E. Buring35, I-Min Lee35, Wong-Ho Chow6, Lee E. Moore2, Timothy Eisen30, Marc Henrion42, Marc Henrion43, James Larkin, Poulami Barman11, Bradley C. Leibovich11, Toni K. Choueiri33, G. Mark Lathrop44, Jean-François Deleuze8, Jean-François Deleuze9, Marc J. Gunter1, James D. McKay1, Xifeng Wu6, Richard S. Houlston42, Stephen J. Chanock2, Caroline L Relton4, J. Brent Richards44, Richard M. Martin45, Richard M. Martin4, George Davey Smith4, Paul Brennan1 
TL;DR: This study provides novel evidence for an etiological role of insulin in RCC, as well as confirmatory evidence that obesity and DBP influence RCC risk.
Abstract: Background: Several obesity-related factors have been associated with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but it is unclear which individual factors directly influence risk. We addressed this question usin ...

56 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results are largely compatible with published studies and support weak associations of blood pressure with cancers in specific locations and morphologies.
Abstract: Several studies have reported associations of hypertension with cancer, but not all results were conclusive. We examined the association of systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure with th ...

49 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Findings implicate IGF‐I and free testosterone in prostate cancer development and/or progression and two‐sample Mendelian randomisation analysis of IGF-I and risk.
Abstract: Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and testosterone have been implicated in prostate cancer aetiology. Using data from a large prospective full-cohort with standardised assays and repeat blood measurements, and genetic data from an international consortium, we investigated the associations of circulating IGF-I, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), and total and calculated free testosterone concentrations with prostate cancer incidence and mortality. For prospective analyses, risk was estimated using multivariable-adjusted Cox regression in 199 698 male UK Biobank participants. Hazard ratios (HRs) were corrected for regression dilution bias using repeat hormone measurements from a subsample. Two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis of IGF-I and risk used genetic instruments identified from UK Biobank men and genetic outcome data from the PRACTICAL consortium (79 148 cases and 61 106 controls). We used cis- and all (cis and trans) SNP MR approaches. A total of 5402 men were diagnosed with and 295 died from prostate cancer (mean follow-up 6.9 years). Higher circulating IGF-I was associated with elevated prostate cancer diagnosis (HR per 5 nmol/L increment = 1.09, 95% CI 1.05-1.12) and mortality (HR per 5 nmol/L increment = 1.15, 1.02-1.29). MR analyses also supported the role of IGF-I in prostate cancer diagnosis (cis-MR odds ratio per 5 nmol/L increment = 1.34, 1.07-1.68). In observational analyses, higher free testosterone was associated with a higher risk of prostate cancer (HR per 50 pmol/L increment = 1.10, 1.05-1.15). Higher SHBG was associated with a lower risk (HR per 10 nmol/L increment = 0.95, 0.94-0.97), neither was associated with prostate cancer mortality. Total testosterone was not associated with prostate cancer. These findings implicate IGF-I and free testosterone in prostate cancer development and/or progression.

38 citations


Cited by
More filters
Proceedings Article
01 Jan 2019
Abstract: This paper reviews a theory of causal inference based on the Structural Causal Model (SCM) described in (Pearl, 2000a). The theory unifies the graphical, potential-outcome (Neyman-Rubin), decision analytical, and structural equation approaches to causation, and provides both a mathematical foundation and a friendly calculus for the analysis of causes and counterfactuals. In particular, the paper establishes a methodology for inferring (from a combination of data and assumptions) the answers to three types of causal queries: (1) queries about the effect of potential interventions, (2) queries about counterfactuals, and (3) queries about the direct (or indirect) effect of one event on another.

579 citations

Anubha Mahajan, Daniel Taliun, Matthias Thurner, Neil R. Robertson, Jason M. Torres, N. William Rayner, Anthony Payne, Valgerdur Steinthorsdottir, Robert A. Scott, Niels Grarup, James P. Cook, Ellen M. Schmidt, Matthias Wuttke, Chloé Sarnowski, Reedik Magill, Jana Nano, Christian Gieger, Stella Trompet, Cécile Lecoeur, Michael Preuss, Bram P. Prins, Xiuqing Guo, Lawrence F. Bielak, Jennifer E. Below, Donald W. Bowden, John C. Chambers, Young-Jin Kim, Maggie C.Y. Ng, Lauren E. Petty, Xueling Sim, Weihua Zhang, Amanda J. Bennett, Jette Bork-Jensen, Chad M. Brummett, Mickaël Canouil, Kai-Uwe Ec Kardt, Krista Fischer, Sharon L.R. Kardia, Florian Kronenberg, Kristi Läll, Ching-Ti Liu, Adam E. Locke, Jian'an Luan, Loanna Ntalla, Vibe Nylander, Sebastian Schoenherr, Claudia Schurmann, Loic Yengo, Erwin P. Bottinger, Ivan Brandslund, Cramer Christensen, George Dedoussis, Jose C. Florez, Ian Ford, Timothy M. Frayling, Vilmantas Giedraitis, Sophie Hackinger, Andrew T. Hattersley, Christian Herder, M. Arfan Ikram, Martin Ingelsson, Marit E. Jørgensen, Torben Jørgensen, Jennifer Kriebel, Johanna Kuusisto, Symen Ligthart, Cecilia M. Lindgren, Allan Linneberg, Valeriya Lyssenko, Vasiliki Mamakou, Thomas Meitinger, Karen L. Mohlke, Andrew D. Morris, Girish N. Nadkarni, James S. Pankow, Annette Peters, Naveed Sattar, Alena Stančáková, Konstantin Strauch, Kent D. Taylor, Barbara Thorand, Gudmar Thorleifsson, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir, Jaakko Tuomilehto, Daniel R. Witte, Josée Dupuis, Patricia A. Peyser, Eleftheria Zeggini, Ruth J. F. Loos, Philippe Froguel, Erik Ingelsson, Lars Lind, Leif Groop, Markku Laakso, Francis S. Collins, J. Wouter Jukema, Colin N. A. Palmer, Harald Grallert, Andres Metspalu, Abbas Dehghan, Anna Koettgen, Gonçalo R. Abecasis, James B. Meigs, Rotter, Jerome, I, Jonathan Marchini, Oluf Pedersen, Torben Hansen, Claudia Langenberg, Nicholas J. Wareham, Kari Stefansson, Anna L. Gloyn, Andrew P. Morris, Michael Boehnke, McCarthy, Mark, I 
01 Jan 2018
Abstract: We expanded GWAS discovery for type 2 diabetes (T2D) by combining data from 898,130 European-descent individuals (9% cases), after imputation to high-density reference panels. With these data, we (i) extend the inventory of T2D-risk variants (243 loci, 135 newly implicated in T2D predisposition, comprising 403 distinct association signals); (ii) enrich discovery of lower-frequency risk alleles (80 index variants with minor allele frequency <5%, 14 with estimated allelic odds ratio >2); (iii) substantially improve fine-mapping of causal variants (at 51 signals, one variant accounted for >80% posterior probability of association (PPA)); (iv) extend fine-mapping through integration of tissue-specific epigenomic information (islet regulatory annotations extend the number of variants with PPA >80% to 73); (v) highlight validated therapeutic targets (18 genes with associations attributable to coding variants); and (vi) demonstrate enhanced potential for clinical translation (genome-wide chip heritability explains 18% of T2D risk; individuals in the extremes of a T2D polygenic risk score differ more than ninefold in prevalence).Combining 32 genome-wide association studies with high-density imputation provides a comprehensive view of the genetic contribution to type 2 diabetes in individuals of European ancestry with respect to locus discovery, causal-variant resolution, and mechanistic insight.

379 citations

01 Jan 2012
TL;DR: In this article, the associations of metabolites with insulin resistance were studied in 7,098 young Finns (age 31 ± 3 years; 52% women) to elucidate underlying metabolic pathways, using regression models adjusted for age, waist, and standard lipids.
Abstract: Metabolite associations with insulin resistance were studied in 7,098 young Finns (age 31 ± 3 years; 52% women) to elucidate underlying metabolic pathways. Insulin resistance was assessed by the homeostasis model (HOMA-IR) and circulating metabolites quantified by high-throughput nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in two population-based cohorts. Associations were analyzed using regression models adjusted for age, waist, and standard lipids. Branched-chain and aromatic amino acids, gluconeogenesis intermediates, ketone bodies, and fatty acid composition and saturation were associated with HOMA-IR (P < 0.0005 for 20 metabolite measures). Leu, Ile, Val, and Tyr displayed sex- and obesity-dependent interactions, with associations being significant for women only if they were abdominally obese. Origins of fasting metabolite levels were studied with dietary and physical activity data. Here, protein energy intake was associated with Val, Phe, Tyr, and Gln but not insulin resistance index. We further tested if 12 genetic variants regulating the metabolites also contributed to insulin resistance. The genetic determinants of metabolite levels were not associated with HOMA-IR, with the exception of a variant in GCKR associated with 12 metabolites, including amino acids (P < 0.0005). Nonetheless, metabolic signatures extending beyond obesity and lipid abnormalities reflected the degree of insulin resistance evidenced in young, normoglycemic adults with sex-specific fingerprints.

230 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A review of the established modifiable and inherited risk factors for pancreatic cancer can be found in this paper, where the authors provide an up-to-date overview of these risk factors.
Abstract: Pancreatic cancer is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide and its global burden has more than doubled over the past 25 years. The highest incidence regions for pancreatic cancer include North America, Europe and Australia, and although much of this increase is due to ageing worldwide populations, there are key modifiable risk factors for pancreatic cancer such as cigarette smoking, obesity, diabetes and alcohol intake. The prevalence of these risk factors is increasing in many global regions, resulting in increasing age-adjusted incidence rates for pancreatic cancer, but the relative contribution from these risk factors varies globally due to variation in the underlying prevalence and prevention strategies. Inherited genetic factors, although not directly modifiable, are an important component of pancreatic cancer risk, and include pathogenic variants in hereditary cancer genes, genes associated with hereditary pancreatitis, as well as common variants identified in genome-wide association studies. Identification of the genetic changes that underlie pancreatic cancer not only provides insight into the aetiology of this cancer but also provides an opportunity to guide early detection strategies. The goal of this Review is to provide an up-to-date overview of the established modifiable and inherited risk factors for pancreatic cancer.

204 citations