scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Marco Congedo

Bio: Marco Congedo is an academic researcher from University of Grenoble. The author has contributed to research in topics: Blind signal separation & Riemannian geometry. The author has an hindex of 39, co-authored 155 publications receiving 8610 citations. Previous affiliations of Marco Congedo include Centre national de la recherche scientifique & French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper compares classification algorithms used to design brain-computer interface (BCI) systems based on electroencephalography (EEG) in terms of performance and provides guidelines to choose the suitable classification algorithm(s) for a specific BCI.
Abstract: In this paper we review classification algorithms used to design brain–computer interface (BCI) systems based on electroencephalography (EEG). We briefly present the commonly employed algorithms and describe their critical properties. Based on the literature, we compare them in terms of performance and provide guidelines to choose the suitable classification algorithm(s) for a specific BCI.

2,519 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A comprehensive overview of the modern classification algorithms used in EEG-based BCIs is provided, the principles of these methods and guidelines on when and how to use them are presented, and a number of challenges to further advance EEG classification in BCI are identified.
Abstract: Objective: Most current Electroencephalography (EEG)-based Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) are based on machine learning algorithms. There is a large diversity of classifier types that are used in this field, as described in our 2007 review paper. Now, approximately 10 years after this review publication, many new algorithms have been developed and tested to classify EEG signals in BCIs. The time is therefore ripe for an updated review of EEG classification algorithms for BCIs. Approach: We surveyed the BCI and machine learning literature from 2007 to 2017 to identify the new classification approaches that have been investigated to design BCIs. We synthesize these studies in order to present such algorithms, to report how they were used for BCIs, what were the outcomes, and to identify their pros and cons. Main results: We found that the recently designed classification algorithms for EEG-based BCIs can be divided into four main categories: adaptive classifiers, matrix and tensor classifiers, transfer learning and deep learning, plus a few other miscellaneous classifiers. Among these, adaptive classifiers were demonstrated to be generally superior to static ones, even with unsupervised adaptation. Transfer learning can also prove useful although the benefits of transfer learning remain unpredictable. Riemannian geometry-based methods have reached state-of-the-art performances on multiple BCI problems and deserve to be explored more thoroughly, along with tensor-based methods. Shrinkage linear discriminant analysis and random forests also appear particularly useful for small training samples settings. On the other hand, deep learning methods have not yet shown convincing improvement over state-of-the-art BCI methods. Significance: This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the modern classification algorithms used in EEG-based BCIs, presents the principles of these Review of Classification Algorithms for EEG-based BCI 2 methods and guidelines on when and how to use them. It also identifies a number of challenges to further advance EEG classification in BCI.

1,280 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The OpenViBE software platform is described which enables researchers to design, test, and use braincomputer interfaces (BCIs) and its suitability for the design of VR applications controlled with a BCI is shown.
Abstract: This paper describes the OpenViBE software platform which enables researchers to design, test, and use brain--computer interfaces (BCIs). BCIs are communication systems that enable users to send commands to computers solely by means of brain activity. BCIs are gaining interest among the virtual reality (VR) community since they have appeared as promising interaction devices for virtual environments (VEs). The key features of the platform are (1) high modularity, (2) embedded tools for visualization and feedback based on VR and 3D displays, (3) BCI design made available to non-programmers thanks to visual programming, and (4) various tools offered to the different types of users. The platform features are illustrated in this paper with two entertaining VR applications based on a BCI. In the first one, users can move a virtual ball by imagining hand movements, while in the second one, they can control a virtual spaceship using real or imagined foot movements. Online experiments with these applications together with the evaluation of the platform computational performances showed its suitability for the design of VR applications controlled with a BCI. OpenViBE is a free software distributed under an open-source license.

687 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A new classification framework for brain-computer interface (BCI) based on motor imagery using spatial covariance matrices as EEG signal descriptors and relying on Riemannian geometry to directly classify these matrices using the topology of the manifold of symmetric and positive definite matrices.
Abstract: This paper presents a new classification framework for brain-computer interface (BCI) based on motor imagery. This framework involves the concept of Riemannian geometry in the manifold of covariance matrices. The main idea is to use spatial covariance matrices as EEG signal descriptors and to rely on Riemannian geometry to directly classify these matrices using the topology of the manifold of symmetric and positive definite (SPD) matrices. This framework allows to extract the spatial information contained in EEG signals without using spatial filtering. Two methods are proposed and compared with a reference method [multiclass Common Spatial Pattern (CSP) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA)] on the multiclass dataset IIa from the BCI Competition IV. The first method, named minimum distance to Riemannian mean (MDRM), is an implementation of the minimum distance to mean (MDM) classification algorithm using Riemannian distance and Riemannian mean. This simple method shows comparable results with the reference method. The second method, named tangent space LDA (TSLDA), maps the covariance matrices onto the Riemannian tangent space where matrices can be vectorized and treated as Euclidean objects. Then, a variable selection procedure is applied in order to decrease dimensionality and a classification by LDA is performed. This latter method outperforms the reference method increasing the mean classification accuracy from 65.1% to 70.2%.

591 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Results show more synchronized alpha activity in the tinnitus patients with a serious amount of distress with peaks localized to various emotion-related areas, and areas found show some overlap with the emotional component of the pain matrix and the distress related areas in asthmatic dyspnea.

328 citations


Cited by
More filters
Christopher M. Bishop1
01 Jan 2006
TL;DR: Probability distributions of linear models for regression and classification are given in this article, along with a discussion of combining models and combining models in the context of machine learning and classification.
Abstract: Probability Distributions.- Linear Models for Regression.- Linear Models for Classification.- Neural Networks.- Kernel Methods.- Sparse Kernel Machines.- Graphical Models.- Mixture Models and EM.- Approximate Inference.- Sampling Methods.- Continuous Latent Variables.- Sequential Data.- Combining Models.

10,141 citations

01 Jan 1990
TL;DR: An overview of the self-organizing map algorithm, on which the papers in this issue are based, is presented in this article, where the authors present an overview of their work.
Abstract: An overview of the self-organizing map algorithm, on which the papers in this issue are based, is presented in this article.

2,933 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper compares classification algorithms used to design brain-computer interface (BCI) systems based on electroencephalography (EEG) in terms of performance and provides guidelines to choose the suitable classification algorithm(s) for a specific BCI.
Abstract: In this paper we review classification algorithms used to design brain–computer interface (BCI) systems based on electroencephalography (EEG). We briefly present the commonly employed algorithms and describe their critical properties. Based on the literature, we compare them in terms of performance and provide guidelines to choose the suitable classification algorithm(s) for a specific BCI.

2,519 citations