scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Author

Marco Molinaro

Bio: Marco Molinaro is an academic researcher from INAF. The author has contributed to research in topics: Virtual observatory & Planetary system. The author has an hindex of 22, co-authored 91 publications receiving 6833 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Gaia as discussed by the authors is a cornerstone mission in the science programme of the European Space Agency (ESA). The spacecraft construction was approved in 2006, following a study in which the original interferometric concept was changed to a direct-imaging approach.
Abstract: Gaia is a cornerstone mission in the science programme of the EuropeanSpace Agency (ESA). The spacecraft construction was approved in 2006, following a study in which the original interferometric concept was changed to a direct-imaging approach. Both the spacecraft and the payload were built by European industry. The involvement of the scientific community focusses on data processing for which the international Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (DPAC) was selected in 2007. Gaia was launched on 19 December 2013 and arrived at its operating point, the second Lagrange point of the Sun-Earth-Moon system, a few weeks later. The commissioning of the spacecraft and payload was completed on 19 July 2014. The nominal five-year mission started with four weeks of special, ecliptic-pole scanning and subsequently transferred into full-sky scanning mode. We recall the scientific goals of Gaia and give a description of the as-built spacecraft that is currently (mid-2016) being operated to achieve these goals. We pay special attention to the payload module, the performance of which is closely related to the scientific performance of the mission. We provide a summary of the commissioning activities and findings, followed by a description of the routine operational mode. We summarise scientific performance estimates on the basis of in-orbit operations. Several intermediate Gaia data releases are planned and the data can be retrieved from the Gaia Archive, which is available through the Gaia home page.

5,164 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
B. S. Acharya1, Marcos Daniel Actis2, T. Aghajani3, G. Agnetta4  +979 moreInstitutions (122)
TL;DR: The Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) as discussed by the authors is a very high-energy (VHE) gamma ray observatory with an international collaboration with more than 1000 members from 27 countries in Europe, Asia, Africa and North and South America.

701 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Stephen J. Smartt1, Stefano Valenti2, Stefano Valenti3, Morgan Fraser4, Cosimo Inserra1, David Young1, Mark Sullivan5, Andrea Pastorello, Stefano Benetti, Avishay Gal-Yam6, Cristina Knapic, Marco Molinaro, Riccardo Smareglia, K. W. Smith1, S. Taubenberger7, O. Yaron6, Joseph P. Anderson8, Chris Ashall9, C. Balland10, C. Baltay11, C. Barbarino12, Franz E. Bauer13, Franz E. Bauer14, Franz E. Bauer15, S. Baumont10, D. Bersier9, Nadejda Blagorodnova4, S. Bongard10, M. T. Botticella, F. Bufano16, Mattia Bulla1, Enrico Cappellaro, Heather Campbell4, F. Cellier-Holzem10, Ting-Wan Chen1, M. J. Childress17, Alejandro Clocchiatti15, Alejandro Clocchiatti13, Carlos Contreras18, Carlos Contreras19, Massimo Dall'Ora, John Danziger, T. de Jaeger20, A. De Cia6, M. Della Valle, Michel Dennefeld21, Nancy Elias-Rosa22, N. Elman11, U. Feindt23, U. Feindt24, M. Fleury10, E. E. E. Gall1, Santiago González-Gaitán20, Lluís Galbany20, A. Morales Garoffolo22, Laura Greggio, L. Le Guillou10, Stephan Hachinger25, E. Hadjiyska11, P. E. Hage10, Wolfgang Hillebrandt7, Simon Hodgkin4, Eric Hsiao19, Eric Hsiao18, Phil A. James9, Anders Jerkstrand1, Tuomas Kangas26, Erkki Kankare1, Rubina Kotak1, Markus Kromer27, Hanindyo Kuncarayakti20, Giorgos Leloudas28, Giorgos Leloudas6, Peter Lundqvist27, J. D. Lyman29, Isobel Hook30, Kate Maguire8, Ilan Manulis6, S. Margheim, Seppo Mattila26, Justyn R. Maund1, Paolo A. Mazzali9, M. McCrum1, Ryan McKinnon11, M. E. Moreno-Raya, Matt Nicholl1, Peter Nugent31, Peter Nugent32, Reynald Pain10, Giuliano Pignata13, Giuliano Pignata16, Mark M. Phillips19, J. Polshaw1, Maria Letizia Pumo, David Rabinowitz11, E. Reilly1, C. Romero-Canizales13, C. Romero-Canizales15, Richard Scalzo17, Brian P. Schmidt17, Steve Schulze13, Steve Schulze15, Stuart A. Sim1, Jesper Sollerman27, Francesco Taddia27, Leonardo Tartaglia33, Giacomo Terreran1, L. Tomasella, Massimo Turatto, Emma S. Walker11, Nicholas A. Walton4, L. Wyrzykowski4, L. Wyrzykowski34, Fang Yuan17, Luca Zampieri 
TL;DR: The first data release (SSDR1) contains flux calibrated spectra from the first year (April 2012-2013), and a total of 221 confirmed supernovae were classified, and they released calibrated optical spectra and classifications publicly within 24 h of the data being taken as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: Context. The Public European Southern Observatory Spectroscopic Survey of Transient Objects (PESSTO) began as a public spectroscopic survey in April 2012. PESSTO classifies transients from publicly available sources and wide-field surveys, and selects science targets for detailed spectroscopic and photometric follow-up. PESSTO runs for nine months of the year, January - April and August - December inclusive, and typically has allocations of 10 nights per month. Aims. We describe the data reduction strategy and data products that are publicly available through the ESO archive as the Spectroscopic Survey data release 1 (SSDR1). Methods. PESSTO uses the New Technology Telescope with the instruments EFOSC2 and SOFI to provide optical and NIR spectroscopy and imaging. We target supernovae and optical transients brighter than 20.5(m) for classification. Science targets are selected for follow-up based on the PESSTO science goal of extending knowledge of the extremes of the supernova population. We use standard EFOSC2 set-ups providing spectra with resolutions of 13-18 angstrom between 3345-9995 angstrom. A subset of the brighter science targets are selected for SOFI spectroscopy with the blue and red grisms (0.935-2.53 mu m and resolutions 23-33 angstrom) and imaging with broadband JHK(s) filters. Results. This first data release (SSDR1) contains flux calibrated spectra from the first year (April 2012-2013). A total of 221 confirmed supernovae were classified, and we released calibrated optical spectra and classifications publicly within 24 h of the data being taken (via WISeREP). The data in SSDR1 replace those released spectra. They have more reliable and quantifiable flux calibrations, correction for telluric absorption, and are made available in standard ESO Phase 3 formats. We estimate the absolute accuracy of the flux calibrations for EFOSC2 across the whole survey in SSDR1 to be typically similar to 15%, although a number of spectra will have less reliable absolute flux calibration because of weather and slit losses. Acquisition images for each spectrum are available which, in principle, can allow the user to refine the absolute flux calibration. The standard NIR reduction process does not produce high accuracy absolute spectrophotometry but synthetic photometry with accompanying JHK(s) imaging can improve this. Whenever possible, reduced SOFI images are provided to allow this. Conclusions. Future data releases will focus on improving the automated flux calibration of the data products. The rapid turnaround between discovery and classification and access to reliable pipeline processed data products has allowed early science papers in the first few months of the survey.

286 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Stephen J. Smartt, Stefano Valenti, Morgan Fraser, Cosimo Inserra, David Young, Mark Sullivan, Andrea Pastorello, Stefano Benetti, Avishay Gal-Yam, Cristina Knapic, Marco Molinaro, Riccardo Smareglia, K. W. Smith, S. Taubenberger, O. Yaron, Joseph P. Anderson, Chris Ashall, C. Balland, C. Baltay, C. Barbarino, Franz E. Bauer, S. Baumont, D. Bersier, Nadejda Blagorodnova, S. Bongard, M. T. Botticella, F. Bufano, Mattia Bulla, Enrico Cappellaro, H. Campbell, F. Cellier-Holzem, Ting-Wan Chen, M. J. Childress, Alejandro Clocchiatti, C. Contreras, M. Dall' Ora, John Danziger, T. de Jaeger, A. De Cia, M. Della Valle, Michel Dennefeld, Nancy Elias-Rosa, N. Elman, Ulrich Feindt, M. Fleury, E. E. E. Gall, Santiago González-Gaitán, Lluís Galbany, A. Morales Garoffolo, Laura Greggio, L. Le Guillou, S. Hachinger, E. Hadjiyska, P. E. Hage, Wolfgang Hillebrandt, S. T. Hodgkin, Eric Hsiao, Phil A. James, Anders Jerkstrand, Tuomas Kangas, Erkki Kankare, Rubina Kotak, Markus Kromer, Hanindyo Kuncarayakti, Giorgos Leloudas, Peter Lundqvist, J. D. Lyman, Isobel Hook, Kate Maguire, Ilan Manulis, S. Margheim, Seppo Mattila, Justyn R. Maund, Paolo A. Mazzali, M. McCrum, Ryan McKinnon, M. E. Moreno-Raya, Matt Nicholl, Peter Nugent, R. Pain, M. M. Phillips, Giuliano Pignata, J. Polshaw, Maria Letizia Pumo, David Rabinowitz, E. Reilly, C. Romero-Canizales, Richard Scalzo, Brian P. Schmidt, Steve Schulze, Stuart A. Sim, Jesper Sollerman, Francesco Taddia, Leonardo Tartaglia, Giacomo Terreran, L. Tomasella, Massimo Turatto, E. S. Walker, Nicholas A. Walton, L. Wyrzykowski, Fang Yuan, Luca Zampieri 
TL;DR: In this article, the authors describe the data reduction strategy and data products which are publicly available through the ESO archive as the Spectroscopic Survey Data Release 1 (SSDR1).
Abstract: The Public European Southern Observatory Spectroscopic Survey of Transient Objects (PESSTO) began as a public spectroscopic survey in April 2012. We describe the data reduction strategy and data products which are publicly available through the ESO archive as the Spectroscopic Survey Data Release 1 (SSDR1). PESSTO uses the New Technology Telescope with EFOSC2 and SOFI to provide optical and NIR spectroscopy and imaging. We target supernovae and optical transients brighter than 20.5mag for classification. Science targets are then selected for follow-up based on the PESSTO science goal of extending knowledge of the extremes of the supernova population. The EFOSC2 spectra cover 3345-9995A (at resolutions of 13-18 Angs) and SOFI spectra cover 0.935-2.53 micron (resolutions 23-33 Angs) along with JHK imaging. This data release contains spectra from the first year (April 2012 - 2013), consisting of all 814 EFOSC2 spectra and 95 SOFI spectra (covering 298 distinct objects), in standard ESO Phase 3 format. We estimate the accuracy of the absolute flux calibrations for EFOSC2 to be typically 15%, and the relative flux calibration accuracy to be about 5%. The PESSTO standard NIR reduction process does not yet produce high accuracy absolute spectrophotometry but the SOFI JHK imaging will improve this. Future data releases will focus on improving the automated flux calibration of the data products.

260 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors used HARPS-N high-precision radial velocity measurements obtained during a transit to measure the Rossiter-McLaughlin e ect in the Qatar-1 system, and out-of-transit measurements to redetermine the spectroscopic orbit of the system.
Abstract: Context Our understanding of the formation and evolution of planetary systems is still fragmentary because most of the current data provide limited information about the orbital structure and dynamics of these systems The knowledge of the orbital properties for a variety of systems and at di erent ages yields information on planet migration and on star-planet tidal interaction mechanisms Aims In this context, a long-term, multi-purpose, observational programme has started with HARPS-N at TNG and aims to characterise the global architectural properties of exoplanetary systems The goal of this first paper is to fully characterise the orbital properties of the transiting system Qatar-1 as well as the physical properties of the star and the planet Methods We exploit HARPS-N high-precision radial velocity measurements obtained during a transit to measure the Rossiter-McLaughlin e ect in the Qatar-1 system, and out-of-transit measurements to redetermine the spectroscopic orbit New photometric-transit light-curves were analysed and a spectroscopic characterisation of the host star atmospheric parameters was performed based on various methods (line equivalent width ratios, spectral synthesis, spectral energy distribution) Results We achieved a significant improvement in the accuracy of the orbital parameters and derived the spin-orbit alignment of the system; this information, combined with the spectroscopic determination of the host star properties (rotation, Te , logg, metallicity), allows us to derive the fundamental physical parameters for star and planet (masses and radii) The orbital solution for the Qatar-1 system is consistent with a circular orbit and the system presents a sky-projected obliquity of = 8:4 7:1 deg The planet, with a mass of 1:33 0:05 MJ, is found to be significantly more massive than previously reported The host star is confirmed to be metal-rich ([Fe/H] = 0:20 0:10) and slowly rotating (v sinI = 1:7 0:3 km s 1 ), though moderately active, as indicated by the strong chromospheric emission in the Caii H&K line cores (logR 0 4:60) Conclusions We find that the system is well aligned and fits well within the general versus Te trend We can definitely rule out any significant orbital eccentricity The evolutionary status of the system is inferred based on gyrochronology, and the present orbital configuration and timescale for orbital decay are discussed in terms of star-planet tidal interactions

157 citations


Cited by
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The second Gaia data release, Gaia DR2 as mentioned in this paper, is a major advance with respect to Gaia DR1 in terms of completeness, performance, and richness of the data products.
Abstract: Context. We present the second Gaia data release, Gaia DR2, consisting of astrometry, photometry, radial velocities, and information on astrophysical parameters and variability, for sources brighter than magnitude 21. In addition epoch astrometry and photometry are provided for a modest sample of minor planets in the solar system. Aims: A summary of the contents of Gaia DR2 is presented, accompanied by a discussion on the differences with respect to Gaia DR1 and an overview of the main limitations which are still present in the survey. Recommendations are made on the responsible use of Gaia DR2 results. Methods: The raw data collected with the Gaia instruments during the first 22 months of the mission have been processed by the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (DPAC) and turned into this second data release, which represents a major advance with respect to Gaia DR1 in terms of completeness, performance, and richness of the data products. Results: Gaia DR2 contains celestial positions and the apparent brightness in G for approximately 1.7 billion sources. For 1.3 billion of those sources, parallaxes and proper motions are in addition available. The sample of sources for which variability information is provided is expanded to 0.5 million stars. This data release contains four new elements: broad-band colour information in the form of the apparent brightness in the GBP (330-680 nm) and GRP (630-1050 nm) bands is available for 1.4 billion sources; median radial velocities for some 7 million sources are presented; for between 77 and 161 million sources estimates are provided of the stellar effective temperature, extinction, reddening, and radius and luminosity; and for a pre-selected list of 14 000 minor planets in the solar system epoch astrometry and photometry are presented. Finally, Gaia DR2 also represents a new materialisation of the celestial reference frame in the optical, the Gaia-CRF2, which is the first optical reference frame based solely on extragalactic sources. There are notable changes in the photometric system and the catalogue source list with respect to Gaia DR1, and we stress the need to consider the two data releases as independent. Conclusions: Gaia DR2 represents a major achievement for the Gaia mission, delivering on the long standing promise to provide parallaxes and proper motions for over 1 billion stars, and representing a first step in the availability of complementary radial velocity and source astrophysical information for a sample of stars in the Gaia survey which covers a very substantial fraction of the volume of our galaxy.

8,308 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The first Gaia data release, Gaia DR1 as mentioned in this paper, consists of the positions, parallaxes, and mean proper motions for about 2 million of the brightest stars in common with the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues.
Abstract: At about 1000 days after the launch of Gaia we present the first Gaia data release, Gaia DR1, consisting of astrometry and photometry for over 1 billion sources brighter than magnitude 20.7. We summarize Gaia DR1 and provide illustrations of the scientific quality of the data, followed by a discussion of the limitations due to the preliminary nature of this release. Gaia DR1 consists of: a primary astrometric data set which contains the positions, parallaxes, and mean proper motions for about 2 million of the brightest stars in common with the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues and a secondary astrometric data set containing the positions for an additional 1.1 billion sources. The second component is the photometric data set,consisting of mean G-band magnitudes for all sources. The G-band light curves and the characteristics of ~3000 Cepheid and RR Lyrae stars, observed at high cadence around the south ecliptic pole, form the third component. For the primary astrometric data set the typical uncertainty is about 0.3 mas for the positions and parallaxes, and about 1 mas/yr for the proper motions. A systematic component of ~0.3 mas should be added to the parallax uncertainties. For the subset of ~94000 Hipparcos stars in the primary data set, the proper motions are much more precise at about 0.06 mas/yr. For the secondary astrometric data set, the typical uncertainty of the positions is ~10 mas. The median uncertainties on the mean G-band magnitudes range from the mmag level to ~0.03 mag over the magnitude range 5 to 20.7. Gaia DR1 represents a major advance in the mapping of the heavens and the availability of basic stellar data that underpin observational astrophysics. Nevertheless, the very preliminary nature of this first Gaia data release does lead to a number of important limitations to the data quality which should be carefully considered before drawing conclusions from the data.

2,256 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The first Gaia data release, Gaia DR1 as discussed by the authors, consists of three components: a primary astrometric data set which contains the positions, parallaxes, and mean proper motions for about 2 million of the brightest stars in common with the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues.
Abstract: Context. At about 1000 days after the launch of Gaia we present the first Gaia data release, Gaia DR1, consisting of astrometry and photometry for over 1 billion sources brighter than magnitude 20.7. Aims: A summary of Gaia DR1 is presented along with illustrations of the scientific quality of the data, followed by a discussion of the limitations due to the preliminary nature of this release. Methods: The raw data collected by Gaia during the first 14 months of the mission have been processed by the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (DPAC) and turned into an astrometric and photometric catalogue. Results: Gaia DR1 consists of three components: a primary astrometric data set which contains the positions, parallaxes, and mean proper motions for about 2 million of the brightest stars in common with the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues - a realisation of the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric Solution (TGAS) - and a secondary astrometric data set containing the positions for an additional 1.1 billion sources. The second component is the photometric data set, consisting of mean G-band magnitudes for all sources. The G-band light curves and the characteristics of 3000 Cepheid and RR Lyrae stars, observed at high cadence around the south ecliptic pole, form the third component. For the primary astrometric data set the typical uncertainty is about 0.3 mas for the positions and parallaxes, and about 1 mas yr-1 for the proper motions. A systematic component of 0.3 mas should be added to the parallax uncertainties. For the subset of 94 000 Hipparcos stars in the primary data set, the proper motions are much more precise at about 0.06 mas yr-1. For the secondary astrometric data set, the typical uncertainty of the positions is 10 mas. The median uncertainties on the mean G-band magnitudes range from the mmag level to0.03 mag over the magnitude range 5 to 20.7. Conclusions: Gaia DR1 is an important milestone ahead of the next Gaia data release, which will feature five-parameter astrometry for all sources. Extensive validation shows that Gaia DR1 represents a major advance in the mapping of the heavens and the availability of basic stellar data that underpin observational astrophysics. Nevertheless, the very preliminary nature of this first Gaia data release does lead to a number of important limitations to the data quality which should be carefully considered before drawing conclusions from the data.

2,174 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors presented cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of type Ia supernova (SN Ia) observations obtained by the SDSS-II and SNLS collaborations.
Abstract: Aims. We present cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of type Ia supernova (SN Ia) observations obtained by the SDSS-II and SNLS collaborations. The dataset includes several low-redshift samples (z< 0.1), all three seasons from the SDSS-II (0.05

1,939 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Lennart Lindegren1, Jose M Hernandez2, Alex Bombrun, Sergei A. Klioner3, Ulrich Bastian4, M. Ramos-Lerate, A. de Torres, H. Steidelmüller3, C.A. Stephenson5, David Hobbs1, U. Lammers2, M. Biermann4, R. Geyer3, Thomas Hilger3, Daniel Michalik1, U. Stampa4, Paul J. McMillan1, J. Castañeda6, M. Clotet6, G. Comoretto5, Michael Davidson7, C. Fabricius6, G. Gracia, Nigel Hambly7, A. Hutton, A. Mora, Jordi Portell6, F. van Leeuwen8, U. Abbas, A. Abreu, Martin Altmann4, Martin Altmann9, Alexandre Humberto Andrei, E. Anglada10, L. Balaguer-Núñez6, C. Barache9, Ugo Becciani11, Stefano Bertone12, Stefano Bertone9, Luciana Bianchi, S. Bouquillon9, Geraldine Bourda13, T. Brüsemeister4, Beatrice Bucciarelli, D. Busonero, R. Buzzi, Rossella Cancelliere14, T. Carlucci9, Patrick Charlot13, N. Cheek10, Mariateresa Crosta, C. Crowley, J. H. J. de Bruijne15, F. de Felice16, R. Drimmel, P. Esquej, Agnes Fienga17, E. Fraile, Mario Gai, N. Garralda6, J.J. González-Vidal6, Raphael Guerra2, M. Hauser18, M. Hauser4, Werner Hofmann4, B. Holl19, Stefan Jordan4, Mario G. Lattanzi, H. Lenhardt4, S. Liao20, E. Licata, Tim Lister21, W. Löffler4, Jon Marchant22, J. M. Martín-Fleitas, R. Messineo23, Francois Mignard17, Roberto Morbidelli, E. Poggio14, Alberto Riva, Nicholas Rowell7, E. Salguero, M. Sarasso, Eva Sciacca11, H. I. Siddiqui5, Richard L. Smart, Alessandro Spagna, Iain A. Steele22, F. Taris9, J. Torra6, A. van Elteren24, W. van Reeven, Alberto Vecchiato 
TL;DR: In this article, the authors describe the input data, models, and processing used for the astrometric content of Gaia DR2, and the validation of these results performed within the ASTR task.
Abstract: Context. Gaia Data Release 2 (Gaia DR2) contains results for 1693 million sources in the magnitude range 3 to 21 based on observations collected by the European Space Agency Gaia satellite during the first 22 months of its operational phase.Aims. We describe the input data, models, and processing used for the astrometric content of Gaia DR2, and the validation of these resultsperformed within the astrometry task.Methods. Some 320 billion centroid positions from the pre-processed astrometric CCD observations were used to estimate the five astrometric parameters (positions, parallaxes, and proper motions) for 1332 million sources, and approximate positions at the reference epoch J2015.5 for an additional 361 million mostly faint sources. These data were calculated in two steps. First, the satellite attitude and the astrometric calibration parameters of the CCDs were obtained in an astrometric global iterative solution for 16 million selected sources, using about 1% of the input data. This primary solution was tied to the extragalactic International Celestial Reference System (ICRS) by means of quasars. The resulting attitude and calibration were then used to calculate the astrometric parameters of all the sources. Special validation solutions were used to characterise the random and systematic errors in parallax and proper motion.Results. For the sources with five-parameter astrometric solutions, the median uncertainty in parallax and position at the reference epoch J2015.5 is about 0.04 mas for bright (G = 17 mag, and 0.7 masat G = 20 mag. In the proper motion components the corresponding uncertainties are 0.05, 0.2, and 1.2 mas yr−1 , respectively.The optical reference frame defined by Gaia DR2 is aligned with ICRS and is non-rotating with respect to the quasars to within 0.15 mas yr−1 . From the quasars and validation solutions we estimate that systematics in the parallaxes depending on position, magnitude, and colour are generally below 0.1 mas, but the parallaxes are on the whole too small by about 0.03 mas. Significant spatial correlations of up to 0.04 mas in parallax and 0.07 mas yr−1 in proper motion are seen on small ( DR2 astrometry are given in the appendices.

1,836 citations