Margarita Schoels

Bio: Margarita Schoels is an academic researcher from Heidelberg University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Complement system & ZAP70. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 5 publications receiving 322 citations.

The complement receptor 3, CR3 (CD11b/CD18), on T lymphocytes: activation-dependent up-regulation and regulatory function

Abstract: The complement receptor 3 (CR3; CD11b/CD18) is present exclusively on leukocytes, particularly on NK cells, monocytes and polymorphonuclear neutrophils. Approximately 10% of peripheral T lymphocytes and, as we found now mainly CD8+ cells, expressed CD11b. Upon stimulation, however, expression of CD11b was up-regulated also on CD4+ cells. Stimulation of T cells either bycross-linked anti-CD3 and IL-2 or by mononuclear cells and mitogen yielded up to 28% CD11b+ T cells. The majority of CD11b+ T cells also expressed CD56. T cell lines established from healthy donors were also found to express CR3. When restimulated up to 90% of cells became positive for CD11b making those cells an ideal tool for studying the functional role of CD11b. Antibodies to CD11b and bona fide ligands for the complement receptor inhibited the anti-CD3-induced T cell proliferation and as well as IL-2 release . In contrast, proliferation of a CD11b– T cell line was not inhibited. Taken together, our data indicate an activation-dependent expression of the complement receptor on T cells and suggest a regulatory function.

Monitoring of NFAT-regulated gene expression in the peripheral blood of allograft recipients: a novel perspective toward individually optimized drug doses of cyclosporine A.

Abstract: Background. With the introduction of cyclosporine A (CsA), long-term allograft function has significantly improved. Problems related to limited therapeutic margins and CsA toxicity remain unsolved. Until now there have been no reliable, practical markers to measure the biologic activity of CsA in vivo. Methods. Expression of NFAT (nuclear factor of activated T cells)-regulated genes (interleukin 2, interferon-, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor) in phorbol myristate acetate/ionomycinstimulated peripheral blood from healthy volunteers (n34) and from stable renal (n25), cardiac (n26), and liver (n14) transplant recipients receiving CsA therapy was measured by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction before and 2 hr after drug intake. Gene expression and CsA plasma levels were correlated. Results. Two hours after oral CsA ingestion, the mean suppression of induced interleukin 2, interferon-, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor gene expression was 85%. The individual decline of NFAT-regulated gene expression and the total drug exposure at this time point were closely related. Six hours after oral CsA uptake, gene expression levels reached predose values and subsequently increased further in some patients (rebound effect). Conclusion. Quantitative measurement of the inhibition of NFAT-regulated gene expression 2 hr after CsA intake represents a novel approach to assess the biologic effectiveness of CsA therapy and has the potential to enable individualized immunosuppressive regimens. Cyclosporine A (CsA) has improved patient and organ graft survival, but the issue of benefit and toxicity remains unsolved (1–3). CsA treatment is still monitored according to CsA predose

Detection of cardiac allograft rejection by real‐time PCR analysis of circulating mononuclear cells

Abstract: Background: Detection of cardiac allograft rejection is based on the histological examination of endomyocardial biopsies (EMB). We have explored the possibility of whether graft rejection could be detected by characteristic gene expression patterns in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of heart-transplant recipients. Methods: The study included 58 blood samples of 44 patients. On the day of EMB, mononuclear cells were isolated from peripheral blood, and gene expression was measured by quantitative real-time PCR. Thirty-nine parameters, including cytokine and chemokine genes were analyzed. Gene expression results were correlated with histological assessment of concomitant evaluated EMB according to International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) nomenclature. Results: Gene expression of perforin, CD95 ligand, granzyme B, RANTES, CXCR3, COX2, ENA 78 and TGF-β1 was significantly different in PBMC of patients with mild to moderate degrees of allograft rejection (≥grade 2) compared with patients exhibiting no or minor forms of rejection (

Complement: a key system for immune surveillance and homeostasis

Abstract: Nearly a century after the significance of the human complement system was recognized, we have come to realize that its functions extend far beyond the elimination of microbes. Complement acts as a rapid and efficient immune surveillance system that has distinct effects on healthy and altered host cells and foreign intruders. By eliminating cellular debris and infectious microbes, orchestrating immune responses and sending 'danger' signals, complement contributes substantially to homeostasis, but it can also take action against healthy cells if not properly controlled. This review describes our updated view of the function, structure and dynamics of the complement network, highlights its interconnection with immunity at large and with other endogenous pathways, and illustrates its multiple roles in homeostasis and disease.

The International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the care of heart transplant recipients

Abstract: Institutional Affiliations Chair Costanzo MR: Midwest Heart Foundation, Lombard Illinois, USA Task Force 1 Dipchand A: Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto Ontario, Canada; Starling R: Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Anderson A: University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA; Chan M: University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Desai S: Inova Fairfax Hospital, Fairfax, Virginia, USA; Fedson S: University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA; Fisher P: Ochsner Clinic, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA; Gonzales-Stawinski G: Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Martinelli L: Ospedale Niguarda, Milano, Italy; McGiffin D: University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA; Parisi F: Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesu, Rome, Italy; Smith J: Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK Task Force 2 Taylor D: Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Meiser B: University of Munich/Grosshaden, Munich, Germany; Baran D: Newark Beth Israel Medical Center, Newark, New Jersey, USA; Carboni M: Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Dengler T: University of Hidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Feldman D: Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Frigerio M: Ospedale Niguarda, Milano, Italy; Kfoury A: Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah, USA; Kim D: University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Kobashigawa J: Cedar-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA; Shullo M: University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Stehlik J: University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA; Teuteberg J: University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Uber P: University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Zuckermann A: University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Task Force 3 Hunt S: Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA; Burch M: Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK; Bhat G: Advocate Christ Medical Center, Oak Lawn, Illinois, USA; Canter C: St. Louis Children Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Chinnock R: Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, Loma Linda, California, USA; Crespo-Leiro M: Hospital Universitario A Coruna, La Coruna, Spain; Delgado R: Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas, USA; Dobbels F: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Grady K: Northwestern University, Chicago, Illlinois, USA; Kao W: University of Wisconsin, Madison Wisconsin, USA; Lamour J: Montefiore Medical Center, New York, New York, USA; Parry G: Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Patel J: Cedar-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA; Pini D: Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy; Pinney S: Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York, USA; Towbin J: Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA; Wolfel G: University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA Independent Reviewers Delgado D: University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Eisen H: Drexler University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Goldberg L: University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Hosenpud J: Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA; Johnson M: University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA; Keogh A: St Vincent Hospital, Sidney, New South Wales, Australia; Lewis C: Papworth Hospital Cambridge, UK; O'Connell J: St. Joseph Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; Rogers J: Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Ross H: University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Russell S: Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Vanhaecke J: University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.

Complement and its role in innate and adaptive immune responses

Abstract: The complement system plays a crucial role in the innate defense against common pathogens. Activation of complement leads to robust and efficient proteolytic cascades, which terminate in opsonization and lysis of the pathogen as well as in the generation of the classical inflammatory response through the production of potent proinflammatory molecules. More recently, however, the role of complement in the immune response has been expanded due to observations that link complement activation to adaptive immune responses. It is now appreciated that complement is a functional bridge between innate and adaptive immune responses that allows an integrated host defense to pathogenic challenges. As such, a study of its functions allows insight into the molecular underpinnings of host-pathogen interactions as well as the organization and orchestration of the host immune response. This review attempts to summarize the roles that complement plays in both innate and adaptive immune responses and the consequences of these interactions on host defense.

Complement System Part II: Role in Immunity.

Abstract: The complement system has been considered for a long time as a simple lytic cascade, aimed to kill bacteria infecting the host organism. Nowadays, this vision has changed and it is well accepted that complement is a complex innate immune surveillance system, playing a key role in host homeostasis, inflammation, and in the defense against pathogens. This review discusses recent advances in the understanding of the role of complement in physiology and pathology. It starts with a description of complement contribution to the normal physiology (homeostasis) of a healthy organism, including the silent clearance of apoptotic cells and maintenance of cell survival. In pathology, complement can be a friend or a foe. It acts as a friend in the defense against pathogens, by inducing opsonization and a direct killing by C5b–9 membrane attack complex and by triggering inflammatory responses with the anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a. Opsonization plays also a major role in the mounting of an adaptive immune response, involving antigen presenting cells, T-, and B-lymphocytes. Nevertheless, it can be also an enemy, when pathogens hijack complement regulators to protect themselves from the immune system. Inadequate complement activation becomes a disease cause, as in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, C3 glomerulopathies, and systemic lupus erythematosus. Age-related macular degeneration and cancer will be described as examples showing that complement contributes to a large variety of conditions, far exceeding the classical examples of diseases associated with complement deficiencies. Finally, we discuss complement as a therapeutic target.